tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877371347086447490.post63941792540641216..comments2024-03-26T08:03:00.564+11:00Comments on The Audient: A trio of theftsDerek Armstronghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13750747272647975591noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877371347086447490.post-76954658509673233712010-11-10T03:41:26.770+11:002010-11-10T03:41:26.770+11:00Oh man, I hadn't heard about that. I don't...Oh man, I hadn't heard about that. I don't use this acronym very often, but that got a genuine LOL from me when I read that. <br /><br />What's also stupid about that is that they already have two Mission: Impossible sequels that just got were just named numerically. I guess it goes to show you how sequel numbers are the kiss of death these days, or at least that's how studios perceive it.Derek Armstronghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13750747272647975591noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877371347086447490.post-88061235744023596542010-11-09T09:37:31.781+11:002010-11-09T09:37:31.781+11:00And then there is M:I4 that has been named: Missio...And then there is M:I4 that has been named: Mission: Impossible - Ghost Protocol.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01249489851664731029noreply@blogger.com