A time warp to when Tim Curry was still alive

I got a little tired of just using "R.I.P. [name of cinematic luminary who has just died]" as the subject for my in memoriam posts, so I hope this one isn't too cheeky. Then again, I think Tim Curry was a guy who would have appreciated a little cheek in the discussion of his death, if anyone would.

I might have actually written a post yesterday to memorialise Dolly Parton, but I didn't feel like I had the right. Any Dolly Parton movies I've seen, I haven't seen in 40 years -- that would be 9 to 5 -- and I'd be faking it if I said I had a meaningful relationship to her music. I appreciated her generally the way the whole world does/did, but this is not a blog about great people. It's a movie blog.

And I can say I had a significant relationship with Tim Curry, through the role that will forever be identified with him: Dr. Frank-N-Furter from The Rocky Horror Picture Show. Pictured above.

I first saw Jim Sharman's 1975 cult classic in my later high school years, when I was old enough to be going to Harvard Square in Boston at midnight on a Saturday night. That was where they showed the film complete with all the fixins: people dressed up as the characters, people chanting the accompanying comments at the screen, and before theater owners got tired of the clean-up, people throwing rice and other projectiles that had been curated as part of the interactive experience. I'd say I did this about three times, enough to feel like I really "got it" and was a small part of a particular scene.

Because of the uniqueness of that experience, it was a while before I saw The Rocky Horror Picture Show again. In fact, it was probably decades. The only repeat viewings I can be sure about are when I watched it in June of 2016 and November of 2020. If there was one other viewing between, say, 1991 and when I started keeping track of my rewatches in 2006, I don't know when it would have been or under what circumstances it would have occurred.

But it was amazing how much of that movie became entrenched in my brain from just a handful of times I went in the early 1990s. I think this was a very real part of my maturation as a young progressive, because this subject matter is not the sort of thing with which I would have had much of a relationship before then. Men in lingerie and mascara and lipstick? It would have either been taboo or I just wouldn't have understood it. 

Tim Curry's performance as Frank brought me into a world of better understanding, even as it was the furthest thing from any sort of teaching tool. This movie was a thumb in the eye of good taste, but it was having a ball with itself, and Curry was a central part of that.

He sashayed. He preened. He licked his lips in naked desire. He bugged out his eyes. He huffed and puffed and played the ultimate drama queen. He thrust his hips as part of "Time Warp." 

And this combination of attributes broke through the shell of an 18-year-old kid whose upbringing was fairly sheltered, even though it was always within a family context, and greater community context, of great liberalism. 

And by the end of this movie, this selfish narcissist who kills people and engages in scientific experiments in order to gratify his own sexual desires? He's worked his way into our heart, and his ultimate demise feels tragic.

All within a context of extreme cheekiness, of course.

Curry did other work. I still remembering him running around the Clue mansion with great fondness. He's really good in The Hunt for Red October. IMDB tells me he was also in Congo. I'm not going to do justice to his 245 television and movie credits here.

But even if he had only ever been Frank-N-Furter, his legacy would have been ensured and we would still be mourning him today.

Rest in peace, Frank. 

Rocky Balboa, Rocky Horror

Note: I had already written most of this piece when I (belatedly) heard about the unspeakably tragic shooting at the club in Orlando. It stopped my fingers dead in their tracks, and it's been a day of miserable contemplation. But I finished, and decided that the subject matter of this post is kind of a fitting tribute to the victims of last night's terrorist hatred, most of whom were homosexual. So I'll post this piece as is without any further comment, and continue to mourn for those we lost. 

This image -- shared to my Flickcharters Facebook group a couple weeks ago, with the witty caption "Did you know?" -- seemed like the perfect thing to share with you the day after I watched a Rocky double feature.

As often happens, the fates aligned (more or less) unintentionally, and I ended up watching Creed and The Rocky Horror Picture Show on the same evening. Only one of which features Sylvester Stallone.

This was my third time seeing Creed, which I ranked as my #2 movie of 2015. But my wife had yet to see it, and it made a perfect viewing for a long weekend (we're celebrating the queen's birthday today in Australia, even though her actual birthday is in April). On such long weekends we try extra hard to come up with something good to watch. I was so excited for her to see it that I even splurged the extra dollar for an HD rental.

Then Rocky Horror had been borrowed from the library for more than a month, already surviving one renewal. It needed to get watched as soon as possible, and again, the long weekend seemed like a good excuse.

Since I've already talked plenty about Creed (see here, here and here), I want to spend the lion's share of my post today talking about a movie I hadn't seen in something like 25 years -- and only ever in the theater.

I want to say that The Rocky Horror Picture Show is the movie I've seen most in the theater, and it's definitely the movie I'd seen most in the theater without ever seeing it on video. Its only competition for theatrical viewings is Pulp Fiction, which I saw four times in the theater in 1994 and 1995. I can't tell you exactly how many times I went to a midnight screening of Rocky Horror in Boston's Harvard Square in the early 1990s, but it was somewhere between three and five. I guess if it was only three, it would also be competing with The Goonies, the only other film I'm certain I've seen more than twice in the theater (I saw it three times in one week when it first came out). But just for the sake of it, let's say I saw Rocky Horror five times and just crown it the king.

But as much as I loved the experience of going to see the movie -- and of course the movie itself, though they were a bit inseparable -- I had never seen it again since then. I felt something crucial would be lost by watching it at home, without anyone shouting lovingly vulgar supplemental dialogue at the screen, without dodging handfuls of rice and sprays of water, most of it coming from squirt guns. I didn't know if my affection for it could survive the loss of the rowdiness and ecstatic joy of the crowd that was part and parcel to the viewing experience.

So it took a long time to watch it on video. A reallllly long time.

A long time that eventually seemed to be counterproductive. I had to admit to myself that I wasn't likely to attend another midnight screening of The Rocky Horror Picture Show anytime soon. So to continue to wait for a day that might never come would just be to deny myself the pleasure -- guilty though it may be -- of immersing myself in this glorious camp once more.

What really amazed me was how many of the audience retorts I remembered, which I hadn't heard in something like 25 years. It wasn't just "Asshole!" when Brad Majors' name was mentioned or "Slut!" when anyone invokes Janet Weiss. It was the alternate lyrics to the songs, and even the additional dialogue that was meant to heighten the double entendres in this screenplay and fill some of its sizeable dead spots in the delivery. Seeing the images and hearing the songs stimulated parts of my brain that I thought no longer retained this information, as though it had been just yesterday.

The thing I noticed straightaway was that the experience of Rocky Horror in Harvard Square was not necessarily universal. My wife watched most of the movie with me, having had something of a similar experience with seeing it at midnight screenings. But even the above epithets for Brad and Janet were too much for her, as if I were insulting dear and sweet members of her family. So I repeated very few of the alternate lyrics that were popping into my head. I did repeat some, as though it were some kind of proof/validation of my legitimate claim to Rocky fandom.

Another thing that occurred to me, as I involuntarily produced some of these rejoinders, was that some of them are more than vulgar -- they're actually politically incorrect. "Dammit, Janet, let's go screw" is not so inflammatory, but how about "Brad, you fag, fuck you too"? I was struck by the strangeness of the fact that an obviously gay-friendly crowd (you can't devote yourself to this movie unless you're gay-friendly) willingly produced one of the more hurtful ways to insult homosexuals, with an unself-conscious glee. I suppose part of that was the era in which I attended those shows, not long after the years when regular people used the word "gay" as a generic adjective meaning "bad" or "dumb." But I'm thinking it was more a form of empowerment. You can only call someone a fag if you are one, just how only black people are allowed to call each other the n-word.

And though I did find that there was a dimension missing from the experience, just being in the presence of these over-the-top characters -- especially Tim Curry's Frank N Furter -- was a grand delight. The shouting of audience members might have also helped keep me awake better, as we did start the movie after 11 and I just don't have the stamina I once did. But I never dozed for more than 30 seconds, and finished the thing before 1, feeling like I'd just sat and chatted with an old friend.

An old friend who wears a garter and lingerie under his mad scientist doctor scrubs, kills and serves fresh biker for dinner, and creates life in a laboratory just so he can fuck it, but an old friend nonetheless.

Columbia is the most family friendly

This is not strictly about movies, but it sort of is.

There have been posters up around town for the past couple months in anticipation of the arrival of The Rocky Horror Show, a stage version of the cult movie that has been shepherded through its long life by Richard O'Brien, who plays Riff Raff in the original film. (And co-wrote the screenplay for the film.)

However, I noticed that they picked a sort of interesting ambassador for the show: Columbia, played in the original film by Nell Campbell, who seems decidedly to be a secondary character.

Dr. Frank-N-Furter, the transvestite played iconically by Tim Curry in the original film, would seem to be the obvious choice to adorn the posters. Except then a bunch of prospective Melbourne theatergoers would be confronted with some version of this:

It didn't occur to me until now that the most famous character from either The Rocky Horror Picture Show or The Rocky Horror Show may not be the best way to sell it. I suspect that there is a certain squeamishness, even among a populace as generally liberal-minded as you find in Melbourne, about seeing a man with bushy hair dressed in lingerie. The bushy hair may or may not contribute to that squeamishness.

By putting Columbia front and center, though, aren't you trying to sell this as more of a straight burlesque show, and not the transgressive and totally out-there pseudo sci-fi monster movie costume epic that it really is? And mightn't that seem like false advertising?

More than anything, though, all this advertising has made me yearn for another screening of the movie, which I have not seen in more than 20 years, and in fact have never seen in a home screening environment. I probably last went to see the midnight show of the movie in 1992 or 1993, and that's a long time to go without seeing what was a favorite of mine back in the day.

Let's see if I can scrounge this movie up somewhere, and soon.