Showing posts with label matthew goode. Show all posts
Showing posts with label matthew goode. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 6, 2025

Is this the career Dan Stevens thought he'd have?

Don't get me wrong, Dan Stevens has had plenty of work, especially compared to the other alumni of Downton Abbey. Possibly only Lily James has had a comparable level of post-Abbey success.

But is the career he's having now really why he left the green pastures of Julian Fellowes' show for the seemingly greener pastures of Hollywood?

Because he left a hit show at the height of its success, Stevens follows in the footsteps of cautionary tales like David Caruso, whose snubbing of NYPD Blue saw him out in the wilderness of middling movie success until he scurried back to television with CSI: Miami. 

Stevens has done better than that, but he'll still carry with him -- at least with me, and I'm sure other Abbey watchers -- the reminder of having bailed on the show at the height of our shipping of his Matthew Crawley and Michelle Dochery's Mary Crawley. (Don't worry, it's not as gross as it sounds. They were distant cousins, if memory serves.) It's probably not a spoiler at this point to say they killed him off in a car accident at the end of season 3, I believe it was, at the actor's request, in a way that always seemed sudden if you're being generous, abrupt if you're not. (The only reason we wouldn't say they Poochie'd him was because he requested it instead of being fired.)

The reason I'm considering this today is that last night I watched Abigail, the perfectly acceptable horror movie from last year in which Stevens stars. There's actually another reason thinking back on Downton Abbey is particularly appropriate with Abigail, but I'll get to that later on.

"Perfectly acceptable" describes Stevens' career in general. Let's look at some of the highlights, or maybe I should say, mid-lights:

The first movie I remember him being in after he left Abbey was The Guest, which is not anyone's idea of a big, "announce yourself to everyone else who doesn't watch Downton Abbey" role. It's a sort of home invasion thriller directed by Adam Wingard, who yes, was a name there for a bit and directed a couple Godzilla movies. But I don't really hear anyone talking about The Guest in any of my cinematic circles.

Also in 2014, among the movies I saw, were The Cobbler and Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb. The former, an Adam Sandler vehicle, was sort of a laughingstock, even though it was directed by a director with credibility (Win Win's Tom McCarthy), and I don't think he even had a particularly memorable role in the third Night at the Museum movie, though I don't really remember that movie so it's not surprising I don't remember his role in it.

I saw him in Colossal in 2016 -- don't remember him in that but he wasn't the star -- but probably his first really "big" showcase was as the titular beast in Beauty and the Beast in 2017. And while this is certainly a prominent showcase, it is also, notably, a showcase that does not put his real face on display for all but a very small percentage of the running time. 

I suppose the best movie I think he's made since leaving the show was Alex Ross Perry's Her Smell, which ranked in my top ten in 2018. This is not the sort of movie you make, though, if you are leaving a show because you want bigger and better things, because you want to see your name in lights. (More on that thought in a moment.)

His concentrated efforts in the year 2020 may be both the most sustained interesting period since he left the show, and also the most illustrative of where he finds himself at this point. I really liked both Dave Franco's The Rental and especially Eurovision Song Contest: The Story of Fire Saga, which was just outside my top ten for the year. However, in both films he's clearly the member of an ensemble, not the star. The same can also be said for Blithe Spirit, but the interesting thing about this film is that it is almost exactly back in the milieu of Downton Abbey -- which could be kind of interpreted as the equivalent of Caruso running back to TV with CSI: Miami. 

And TV really is where Stevens found himself the past four years, for the most part, until Abigail and Wingard's second Godzilla movie, both last year.

Look there are some good titles in there. I'm not saying there aren't.

But I think if you leave a show like Stevens left Abbey, when we had come to love him so much and felt like there was so much that could be done with his character that we would enjoy watching, he should expect us to scrutinize his choices, and to wonder if it was all worth it.

Then there's the other possibility: Dan Stevens just doesn't care.

There's the possibility -- and maybe reading just a little bit on the internet could confirm this, though you know how I don't like to do that -- that he just didn't think Downton Abbey was challenging him enough. We know David Caruso thought he could be a movie star. I'm only assuming Dan Stevens had the same goal, and maybe I'm wrong about that. So what seem to me like misses on his part, failures to take off in the way he surely wanted, might just be him trying to choose an interesting array of roles that didn't always require him to be a rich lord dressing in 1920s garb.

I said there was a Downton Abbey element about Abigail that I wanted to come back to.

A big reveal at the end of the movie -- and this only counts as a spoiler if you care about "surprises" in the cast, though this actor is not really big enough to qualify -- is that a Big Bad vampire, who is only referred to previously in hushed tones, is played by Matthew Goode.

And what is the significance of this, you ask?

Well, after Mary Crawley lost her new husband to a crash in one of those newfangled automobiles, she eventually took up with quite an ironic new partner in that regard: a race car driver. This is who she ended the series with, as her happily ever after.

And that race car driver was played, of course, by Matthew Goode.

I'm not sure if Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett, the directors of Abigail, really cared about this connection or made the choice with any intentionality, though they do have Goode's character and Stevens' character do battle at the end. Whether that was fighting to decide the matter of Mary Crawley once and for all, I do not know.

Saturday, March 12, 2022

Matthew Goode rarely is

This post contains spoilers for The King's Man, and possibly other films that will be determined as we go.

I don't believe the spoilers would be detrimental to your enjoyment of the film, and the premise of this post basically argues that they shouldn't really be spoilers anyway. Still, read on at your own peril.

I wonder if it was weird for Matthew Goode to possess movie star good looks and his fair share of acting ability, only to end up in Hollywood and always -- and I mean always -- get cast as villains.

They go to a lot of trouble in The King's Man, which I watched on Thursday night, to hide the fact that he's a villain. His character is seen about a half-dozen times -- always from behind (and once with a fencing mask on) to preserve the surprise of who this man is with the outrageous Scottish accent, pulling all the strings in World War I from behind the scenes. (Yes, this movie tackles World War I head on with the delight of an enthusiastic alternate historian, though I was surprised to learn afterward how much of it hypothetically could have been real.)

But who are we kidding? Once Goode was introduced as a minor innocuous character at the beginning, and then nothing was really done with him, it should have been obvious to anyone half paying attention that he was going to end up being the Big Bad. 

Because that's what Goode always -- and I mean always -- does.

As I am typing these words, I have only a general sense of how correct or how absolute this notion is. But I'm going to go through the films he's appeared in that I've seen, just to see how much his filmography bears this out. (I won't bother with the films I haven't seen, as this could subject me to spoilers -- though I should probably say there could be other spoilers ahead, so tread carefully. If you see a particular title come up, and you haven't seen the movie, you can just move past that one before you determine whether I decided he was, indeed, a villain in that film.)

Let's go chronologically. As it turns out I've been watching Goode at the movies for exactly 20 years, which gives this a nice little additional bit of relevance:

Chasing Liberty (2002) - Here is the sort of role Goode might have imagined he'd play his whole career, a handsome and charming love interest for the president's daughter, who is on the lam at a European music festival. It wasn't long after this before he went sinister, though.
Verdict: Not a villain

Match Point (2005) - Had to re-read the plot synopsis on this one. I thought Goode might have been sinister here but he appears to be more of a cuckold. Just being a priggish Brit doesn't mean you're a villain. 
Verdict: Not a villain

The Lookout (2007) - And Goode takes villainy by the teeth. In a pretty scenery-chewing performance if I remember correctly, Goode plays the smarmy leader of a team of would-be bank robbers who conscript the bank's janitor, a former hockey star with brain damage that affects his short-term memory (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), to help rob the bank.
Verdict: Villain

Watchmen (2009) - Similar to in A King's Man, Goode's status as a villain is a late-film reveal, as for most of the time we just think he's one of the good (if underutilized) Watchmen. Nope. He wants to bring the world to its knees, just like the guy in A King's Man.
Verdict: Villain

A Single Man (2009) - Had to go to the plot synopsis on this one too. Turns out Goode plays the deceased lover of the main character, played by Colin Firth. He's remembered fondly but painfully by Firth's character following his death eight months earlier in a car accident.  
Verdict: Not a villain

Stoker (2013) - Hit up this plot synopsis as well despite remembering Goode's villainous ways in this one. Both a pervert (he tries to hit on his teenage niece) and a murderer in this one. 
Verdict: Villain

Belle (2013) - I'm just going to stop mentioning my visits to the Wikipedia plot synopses. Looks like Goode only has a small role in this one, the father of the main character, who gives her into the care of his uncle near the beginning of the film. Not for villainous reasons, though -- maybe for cowardly ones, but I don't really remember.
Verdict: Not a villain

The Imitation Game (2014) - "Great!" I thought. "Goode is almost certainly one of Alan Turing's professional rivals, or someone who wanted to out him!" Nope, just a cryptography colleague, it appears, whose name isn't mentioned very often in the synopsis.
Verdict: Not a villain

Self/less (2015) - So it appears Goode plays the scientist who pioneers the fundamentally unethical body-swapping procedure at the film's core, which just sounds like a villain thing to do, though to be honest, I barely remember this film. Also it's a bit complicated by the fact that part of the time he plays a vessel, which means it's someone else's personality piloting the body. But still ...
Verdict: Villain

Allied (2016) - Appears to be a smaller role of a man who was blinded in the war. A blind person can't be a villain unless it's Don't Breathe, or possibly Don't Breathe 2. 
Verdict: Not a villain

Downton Abbey (2019) - This is probably a good time to cover both of Goode's prominent TV roles on British period pieces -- that I've seen, anyway -- which are his role as Mary's race car driver love interest in Downton Abbey, and his role as Tony Armstrong-Jones on The Crown, where he really mistreats the queen's sister, Princess Margaret. He's lovely in the former and a definite villain in the latter. But in the case of the Downton Abbey movie the answer is ...
Verdict: Not a villain

The King's Man (2021) - As discussed.
Verdict: Villain

Overall verdict: Matthew Goode is not always -- always -- a villain.

However, being a villain in five of the dozen films in which I've seen him at least makes him pretty likely to be cast that way. It would be a higher percentage than most people. And therefore, I can justify the time I've just spent on this.

I suppose this is actually a compliment to Goode, in that when he's a villain, I really remember it. 

In the subject of this post, I used a little play on words, saying "Matthew Goode rarely is," implying the word "good" there. And in that use of "good," meaning it as a synonym for "kind" or "just" or "pious," and an antonym for "evil."

But Goode is definitely "good" in terms of his talent, in terms of what he brings to the screen. And that can be a chilling coldness that has its best times to shine when he's cast as an evil bastard eager to deceive, kill or maybe even molest you.

If Goode weren't so good in the times he's been cast as a villain, I probably wouldn't think there had been so many of them.