Showing posts with label blood and gold. Show all posts
Showing posts with label blood and gold. Show all posts

Monday, June 23, 2025

Punching Nazis

After I got finished watching Shoah on Saturday night, I was really in the mood for punching some Nazis.

Not killing them. Just punching them.

Why not killing? Only punching?

1) I'm not a murderer.

2) Punching is more personal. 

When you kill someone, usually you're doing it with some kind of weapon as an intermediary. Some people can kill people with their bare hands, but it's not reliable if you want to be sure to get the job done.

Punching someone, though? That's flesh-to-flesh, bone-to-bone. That's your knuckles cracking them straight in the jaw, and hopefully not breaking your own hand in the process. That's visceral and that's where real frustration vents itself.

You can tell by the sound effect they use for it in the movies, that familiar short cracking whip, possibly accompanied by a body thudding to the ground.

Speaking of cracking whips, punching Nazis is one of Indiana Jones' favorite pastimes. Sure, he can pull out his pistol and shoot them, but that's such a remote way of showing someone your disdain. A good fist to the face, and they'll remember it and have to rub it something fierce to make the pain go away. 

So yes, it's no surprise I immediately started watching another movie -- yes, another movie, after more than nine hours of Shoah, and more than 14 hours in real time -- in which Nazis get punched, and then followed that with another the next night. 

The first was Blood & Gold, the vastly underseen 2023 Netflix movie that I've never heard another person talk about even though it's really good. The setup: It's the waning days of World War II -- literally, like the last two days -- and we open on German soldiers led by a sadistic commander hanging a deserter near a small village in the country. Instead of succumbing -- the sadistic commander told him it wouldn't snap his neck right away and would take time to kill him -- the alleged deserter is cut down by a war widow, who runs a farm with her mentally challenged brother. This puts them in the path of the commander and his superior officer, who are in the village looking gold in the home of a Jewish family who died in the gas chamber. 

Peter Thorwarth's movie is shot really well and has a Tarantino adjacent style. If it were done worse, you might even call it a ripoff, but the filmmaking is so good all around that a "loving homage" is the appropriate way to refer to it. It's fast-paced and mid-level violent, just fun enough without being gratuitous, and it gets you out of there in only 98 minutes. What more could I ask for after a nine-hour movie? It made my top ten of 2023 and is really worth seeing.

And are there punched Nazis? 

Oh there are punched Nazis indeed.

There are a number of scenes of close physical gouging and mauling and plenty of punch-like activity, but Thorwarth has enough respect for realism that these read more like "subdue your enemy at any cost" fights than they read like "photogenically punch a Nazi square on the jaw" fights. 

But you can bet those Nazis are punched all right. Clawed at and cut and spat on and gouged at. Plenty roughed up. Will feel it in the morning. 

Sunday night brought chapter 2 in this little informal Nazi-punching double feature, with one of the Nazi punchiest movies out there: Quentin Tarantino's Inglourious Basterds. Speaking of Tarantino. 

I had only seen Inglourious Basterds twice, both of which were in the first year of its existence. But that's certainly no knock on it, as it made my top that year and I think of it as being among my top four Tarantino films, joined by Pulp Fiction, Reservoir Dogs and The Hateful Eight

I don't really need to tell you anything about Inglourious Basterds because surely you have seen it. However, I'll tell you about a funny takeaway I had from the film on this viewing, which I wouldn't have been in the position to have when I last saw it in 2010.

Namely, this is by far the closest Quentin Tarantino has to a Wes Anderson movie. However, I'd say if anything, Wes might have been stealing from Quentin.

Although Tarantino's movies have never been without a sense of humor, I think there are moments of absurdity in Inglourious Basterds that feel almost Andersonian in their presentation. Of course, Anderson's movie that is most like this is The Grand Budapest Hotel, which he would not release for another five years. However, Anderson was doing that sort of quirk before Tarantino was, so maybe there is a little bit of mutual respect showing here.

But what we're really here to talk about is the Nazi punching. 

How does Inglourious Basterds fare on that front?

Quite poor, actually.

Oh, plenty of Nazis get theirs -- it's history as revenge fantasy, where essentially the entire top brass of the Third Reich gets taken down in a burning theater, including Hitler riddled with bullets, and then his corpse riddle with some more bullets. 

But actual punching is in short supply. Non-existent, really.

The closest we get is that two of the Basterds, who have gotten into the film premiere, strap on wrist guns that fire through a punching action. Two Nazi guards meet their demise from these wrist guns, and I believe the one played by Eli Roth actually engages in a punch of sorts when he fires it.

Oh, and Aldo Raine does head butt Hans Landa. That's pretty personal -- and something you really have to know how to do without hurting yourself unless you want to walk away with a severe headache.

Saturday, June 17, 2023

Each new movie is better than the one before

When you don't start out with a really solid contender early on in the viewing year -- at least a likely candidate for your eventual top ten -- you'll find that your favorite movie of the year keeps changing, at a sort of comical rate that calls into question the honor bestowed on each of the previous temporary holders of the #1 spot.

Without a Turning Red (my eventual #3 of 2022) or an Everything Everywhere All at Once (my eventual #4 of 2022) there to stabilize the early rankings, things end up kind of like they have so far this year.

My longest reigning #1 of 2023, as you would know from this post, was Shotgun Wedding, which was my #1 from when I saw it on the 2nd of February until April 1st, a reign of 58 days. 

The very same night I posted that, though, I saw M3GAN, which easily supplanted it. M3GAN held on to the top slot for exactly 11 days.

That's when I saw The Magician's Elephant on vacation in Vietnam, and though at the time I liked it more than M3GAN, I'm suspecting they will ultimately swap relative positions by year's end. M3GAN has stuck with me, The Magician's Elephant hasn't -- though of course I do still think it's quite good.

The Magician's Elephant had a bit longer to get used to its throne, wearing the crown from April 12th to May 20th, a span of 38 days. That's when I saw Ben Affleck's Air, and really enjoyed it, easily naming it my new favorite of a so-far fairly disappointing year.

Air barely had time to blink in the top spot, though, because I was taken aback by the German language World War II western Blood & Gold on Netflix, which I saw just nine days later. This was also the first film of 2023 that I gave 4.5 stars on Letterboxd, and considering that it took until May 29th to do it, that's very long by my standards. 

Now finally we have the latest occupant of the penthouse, BlackBerry, which I saw Thursday night -- drawing the curtain on Blood & Gold's 17-day reign.

It occurred to me that something additionally interesting/significant is that since M3GAN first dethroned Shotgun Wedding, I have not see a film that was better than Shotgun Wedding but worse than whatever the current #1 was. So it's either the best I've seen, or middling. So that means my current rankings are:

1. BlackBerry
2. Blood & Gold
3. Air
4. The Magician's Elephant
5. M3GAN
6. Shotgun Wedding

I don't expect this to continue and it certainly can't continue forever, but it's an interesting pattern that has two-and-a-half months of history in its favor. 

So just what was so good about BlackBerry, the second film this year to dramatize the technical and legal challenges involved in a new techie obsession?

Well for starters, it's what the first film, AppleTV's Tetris, should have been. Have a look here if you want to get into the weeds of why I think that film is ultimately a failure, However, if you'd like the simplified version, I'll say that Tetris got the era and its associated nostalgia right, but it completely lost us with a serpentine plot that involved as many reversals as five episodes of Silicon Valley but without our ability to grasp the stakes of those reversals from moment to moment.

BlackBerry, which charts the rise and fall of the first phone where you could send email, effortlessly explains what's going on from moment to moment, focusing on only a small handful of characters and a small handful of narrative developments at a time. It's amazing how much easier it is to appreciate era-specific nostalgia if you are oriented within the plot. 

Matt Johnson may quickly be becoming one of my favorite unheralded directors. If you don't recognize the name, he's also an actor in his films The Dirties and Operation Avalanche. I liked both of those movies waaaay more than I ever guessed I would, slapping 4.5 stars on the former and four on the latter. BlackBerry gets him back up into the 4.5-star range, and it might have been higher if Johnson had sustained the crack-me-up humor from the film's first 45 minutes. The story wouldn't have allowed it, and that's not the film's fault, but let's just say that in this cinematic desert where we're parched for good comedy, this film's first half delivered like few films have for me in recent years.

Johnson's got a DIY style that kind of looks like he's trying to make a mockumentary, and if memory serves, both of the previous films are technically in that genre. This isn't meant to be a mockumentary but it maintains the same half-grainy look of something being done on the cheap. If you think that's an insult, think again. Johnson's style actually requires a high degree of veracity from his actors to match its apparent authenticity, and Johnson's cast complies.

This is the first film where Johnson has worked with actors you actually recognize, who include Jay Baruchel, Saul Rubinek, Cary Elwes and Michael Ironside. But it was another actor I didn't recognize who really blew me away: Glenn Howerton as Jim Balsillie, the co-CEO brought in by the nerds at Research in Motion to kick the ass that they couldn't kick. If I watched It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia I would know who this is, and when I see other pictures of him I do recognize him from other places I've seen him. Playing bald in this film, though, made the actor totally disappear into the role, and his performance as a shark who gets results was by far the film's most memorable and interesting character.

I should not say "by far" because Baruchel and Johnson are both great and both key to much of the film's opening humor. Baruchel, reminding me a bit of Justin Long here, has some great line deliveries as Mike Lazaridis, the genius programmer who invented the BlackBerry and formed the company with his best friend Doug Fremin (Johnson). A man whose confidence is no match for his intellect, he's Jim Balsillie's spiritual opposite -- and eventually someone corrupted by his proximity to his fellow co-CEO. Johnson, meanwhile, wears a variety of different t-shirts celebrating nerd culture throughout, the one who doesn't want to lose his personality and will fight to keep things as they were, while also to grow the company according to their principles -- but is also the most disposable of the three in terms of the company's future trajectory, which becomes a sticking point.

Speaking of nerd culture, there's some great shout-outs here. The room full of genius programmers at Research in Motion -- who will remind you of similar groups of guys in movies like The Social Network -- have a movie night ritual, and we see them all quoting the best lines from Raiders of the Lost Ark and They Live.

I probably shouldn't give you too more because I really want you to go see this. 

It's my #1 movie of the year ... at least until something better comes along.

In about 26.6 days, if the average holds. Or much sooner if we go only on recent trends.