This is the first in
my 2019 monthly series Audient Audit, in
which I’m checking my own records to see if I’ve actually seen certain films I
say I’ve seen.
Not ten minutes into my new monthly viewing series, I
wondered what the hell I’m doing here.
Not only here here, but in this series in general.
Not only here here, but in this series in general.
“Why the hell am I watching Roxanne?” I wondered. “Why does someone need to watch Roxanne in 2019? If I didn’t see it, who
cares?”
To be fair, these thoughts were inspired by a particularly
brutal first ten minutes of the movie. I don’t know what happened during
production, but Roxanne’s first ten minutes involve a lot of really awful ADR –
dialogue recorded later on, and in this case, not matching the action on screen
– and a prolonged scene in which Steve Martin beats up Kevin Nealon and one
other guy with a tennis racquet. I love that there was a phase of Kevin
Nealon’s career when he was cast as a bully, but this scene is terrible. It
doesn’t even sound like Nealon provided his own voice, though he was already on
Saturday Night Live in 1987 when Roxanne was made.
However, at about the ten-minute mark, Roxanne becomes a normal movie. Charming, even. And I was back on
track, for the most part.
No, this series will not be as consequential as watching a
year’s worth of silent movies or pairs of films by great directors. But the
anal retentive in me loves that at the end of it, 12 films that have made it
onto my various viewing lists under dubious circumstances will be legitimate
members of those lists.
I suppose I should tell you a little bit of my history with
Roxanne, to let you know why I originally added it to my lists and why it might
not have been deserving.
I was absolutely certain of having watched a bit of this
movie at my friend’s house on cable within a year or two of its theatrical
release, just before I would have started comprising my viewing lists. I
remember particularly well the Romeo
& Juliet scene (in a movie inspired by Cyrano de Bergerac), where Steve Martin, obscured by bushes,
pretends he’s Rick Rossovich while pledging his love to Daryl Hannah on the
balcony above. In fact, I wonder if it’s possible that I actually saw that part
of the movie more than once.
I was pretty sure, though, that I had not seen the rest of
the movie. Adding it to my lists was, I think, a recognition of the fact that I
had “seen Roxanne” – in other words,
it was kind of a wave of the hand saying “I get what Roxanne is and it’s fair to say that I’ve seen it.”
In trying to confirm how much of the movie I’ve seen, I’ve
recognized a challenge that will run through this series. Given that we tend to
forget the details of even movies we really like, it’ll be difficult to watch
these movies and say for certain that yes, I saw them, or no, I didn’t. The
details of a mediocre movie I saw only a week ago might already be gone, so
what about a mediocre movie I saw 30 years ago?
That said, I didn’t even remember that Steve Martin plays a
fire chief in this movie, which ends up being a fairly significant part of the
action. There’s a lot of time devoted to his training of the bumbling volunteer
firefighters in the ski town in which the movie takes place (one of whom is a young Damon Wayans!), and I feel like I
should have retained at least some memory of that. In fact, I felt like I
really only remember that scene on the balcony.
In the end, the thing that I thought would be a gimmick
played just for laughs – Martin’s enormous schnozz – became a really useful
prop. For all its gargantuan size, the prosthetic nose ends up looking pretty
realistic, and it’s easy to imagine it only being a slight exaggeration on people
who might exist in the real world with that kind of Pinocchio-like
protuberance. The movie actually does a reasonably sensitive job imagining what
it might be like for such a person, what defense mechanisms they might develop
to make their way through the world. In short, the movie was far more
intelligent than the opening scene prepared me for. That said, it still keeps
certain whimsical elements, like the fact that Martin’s character has an
unusual fitness for gymnastics that allows him to scale the sides of houses in
a flash.
Speaking of whimsical bits, there was one random bit I loved that seems to bear no relationship to
anything else in the movie. At one point Martin’s character is exiting a
restaurant and stops to pay for a newspaper from one of those coin-operated
dispensers where you open the door and (on the honor system) take only one
newspaper. Martin does this, reads the front page, screams at the state of the
world today, then pays another coin so he can open the door and put the paper
back in again. Funny! It felt like something Charlie Chaplin might do.
Verdict: Definitely had not seen the whole movie before now,
and am glad enough that I made the time to do so.
I’ve already borrowed The
Witches of Eastwick from the library, so it looks like that will be my
February movie.
2 comments:
Ah, Roxanne. One of my all-time faves. One of those movies that somehow feels dated - that saxophone - but also timeless. That's an interesting point about the beginning. The sound has occurred to me, I think, but never quite registered, if that makes sense. And as for those whimsical bits, like the newspaper, that feels like quintessential Martin. It's like L.A. Story, with so many bits stacked on top of bits that you know he's just been sitting on for years, but that somehow feel just a bit more well integrated here.
I think every movie from the 1980s had a saxophone and synthesizers in it. We'll try not to hold it against them.
Post a Comment