Robert De Niro and Joe Pesci have been earning a lot of
praise this fall leading into winter (leading into summer in Australia), but
there’s one goodfella who has been flying a bit under the radar.
Ray Liotta does not appear in The Irishman, but he does appear in Netflix’s other big awards
contender released within the past month, Marriage
Story. And I’d argue that what he’s doing here may be more interesting than
what they’re doing there.
I’m sure if Martin Scorsese had written a part in The Irishman for Liotta (Harvey
Keitel’s?), he would have gladly accepted it. A commitment to Marriage Story would not have prevented
him. But if not being in The Irishman
did, in some way, allow him to be in Noah Baumbach’s film, I’m grateful for it.
See, De Niro and Pesci are doing things they’ve done before.
Many times before. That’s kind of the point. And to their credit, they are both
playing significantly less hot-headed versions of their prior incarnations of
these characters, in a way that particularly surprised me in Pesci's case.
Ray Liotta? I don’t think I’ve ever seen him be a lawyer
before.
There are a lot of credits on Liotta’s IMDB page – 116, to
be exact – and I can’t possibly know what all those roles were, especially as
some of them were in movies that no one saw. But a cursory scan of the titles, coupled
with the ones I’ve already seen, tells me it’s very unlikely that he’s ever
played an attorney.
And even if he has, it has probably been a shady attorney,
one indistinguishable from the mobster rolls that have been his bread and
butter ever since Goodfellas made him
famous. If not actual mobsters, then criminals, lowlifes and other
rapscallions.
But in Marriage Story,
he’s the best divorce lawyer money can buy – which I don’t suppose rules out
the concept of him being shady. In fact, at $850/hour, maybe he’s even more
shady. But he’s clearly respectable, as only people who can afford it pay for
him.
And he’s really good in the role. It may have less than ten
minutes of screen time in total over only two or possibly three scenes, but
Liotta makes that character truly believable, an able sparring partner for
superlative Laura Dern on the other side of the aisle. I believe that Liotta
could argue for his client like a shark going after chum, and not just because
he’s a sleazebag familiar with all the tricks. It’s because he’s an actually
competent lawyer playing a kill-or-be-killed game.
Seeing Ray Liotta as a respectable lawyer tells me Liotta is
not done reinventing himself as an actor. As for Pesci and De Niro, they are
both paying homage to, and possibly suggesting they have nowhere still to go
from, the roles that made them famous. Pesci had to come out of actual retirement to play the role, as a matter of fact.
Now granted, there’s a bit of an age gap here. Liotta is “only”
65, while the other two both turn 77 in 2020. That’s enough of a gap, at that
age, that it means the difference between still going strong and starting to
wind down.
But when I saw that Scorsese had “rejected” having Liotta in
his movie – not that his calculation was probably anything like that – it kind
of made me wonder why Liotta didn’t get to take part in the fun.
And I’m happy with the answer “He’s still got too many new
surprises left in him.”
No comments:
Post a Comment