Showing posts with label 2010s. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010s. Show all posts

Monday, November 30, 2020

Top 25 of the 2010s, statistically audited

As you would probably know, I posted my top 25 movies of the last decade (plus ten honorable
mentions) just a couple days after I posted my best of 2019. This was back in January.

Why, then, am I interested in revisiting that list less than a year later? When everything from last decade should be well and truly ancient history?

It has to do with what I used -- or rather, what I didn't use -- when I went about making my list.

As you would probably also know, when I make lists on this blog, I like to actually make them. In other words, I like to take the subset of films that relate to that list and shape them into a perfect order myself, without the help of outside sources.

I have a choice in methodology because I do have a source in my life that could just make the list for me. That's Flickchart, and it allows you to easily see your favorites in certain categories -- your favorite Disney movies, your favorite movies directed by Quentin Tarantino, your favorite movies from 1996, and yes, your favorite movies from an entire decade, like the 2010s. There's almost no limit to the way you can filter your chart to see your relative favorites in various subsections of it.

But as I've always said, for a list-maker, it's not fun to just copy over a list that gets made for you, even if that list is a reflection of your own tastes hashed out over thousands and thousands of previous indivdiual choices made by you -- as is the case on Flickchart, where your lists are the result of thousands of duels between two movies to create an ever-more-accurate list of your relative preferences.

So I was never going to use Flickchart to make my best of 2010s list. One reason was that I did not want to. The second reason was that I couldn't.

See, I've gotten way behind in adding my films to Flickchart, a consequence of once deciding I wanted to wait 30 days before adding a new movie to my chart, so it had the chance to "settle" in my mind, and not be placed artificially due to either a strong positive or strong negative reaction to it. I still think that's a useful approach, but it has the practical limitation that it's easy to fall behind. When you have no routine of adding a movie right after you've seen it, it means to add any movies at all, you have to purposefully sit down for a session of Flickcharting at a random time. And it became easy for those to drop from my list of daily priorities.

Over time, I got as much as two years behind on adding new films to my chart, and have forever been trying to work my way out of that hole.

With the pandemic, I've caught up more than I have been in ages. I am now only a little more than ten months behind, and that means I have just surpassed adding the last new film I watched before finalizing my list of the best films of the previous decade.

So for the first time, I do have a way to statistically produce my best of the decade list, now only as an interesting exercise rather the official record. And I do enjoy interesting exercises.

So today, after this typically long preamble, I'm going to see how the movies I chose for my list actually rank on Flickchart, now that they have all been added. 

I should say before I get started, there figure to be some big variances here. That's primarily the case in films where my opinions of them have either grown or shrank on subsequent viewings. If I loved it at the time I added it, but my thoughts on it have cooled a bit since then, it may take some time for that film to work its way down by losing casual duels. When a film loses a duel to a film below it, the most it can move down is one spot in the rankings. So its total loss of position, over time, comes from either losing individual duels itself, or from having other films leapfrog over it by beating films that are higher than it. At the highest ends of my chart, then, it might take a year or longer for a film to drop even 30 spots, on a chart of more than 5,000.

Because of the way Flickchart works, it's easier for a film to take big leaps in the standings rather than big drops. Any film that beats my #1 film in a duel, for example, immediately becomes my #1, even if it had previously been my #3487. (Of course, that would never actually happen, but just to illustrate how the site works.) Still, though, the lower film has to have the right duel at that right time if it wants to make one of those jumps. If my #500 movie really belongs somewhere in the 200-300 range, but it only gets random duels against my top 50 movies of all time or ones that are lower than it, it will not make that jump.

I suspect you've already expended today's allotted reading time on this post before we even get to any of the actual movies. So let's get to that now, on the off chance some of you are still here.

Here is what my top 25 of the decade looked like in January, including the honorable mentions:

25. Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019, Celine Sciamma)
24. BlacKkKlansman (2018, Spike Lee)
23. Inside Llewyn Davis (2013, Joel & Ethan Coen)
22. Red State (2011, Kevin Smith)
21. Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu)
20. Toni Erdmann (2016, Maren Ade)
19. What Maisie Knew (2013, Scott McGehee & David Siegel)
18. Zootopia (2016, Byron Howard & Rich Moore)
17. 127 Hours (2010, Danny Boyle)
16. If Beale Street Could Talk (2018, Barry Jenkins)
15. A Separation (2011, Asghar Farhadi)
14. Boyhood (2014, Richard Linklater)
13. Parasite (2019, Bong Joon-ho)
12. A Ghost Story (2017, David Lowery)
11. Beyond the Hills (2012, Cristian Mungiu)
10. Under the Skin (2014, Jonathan Glazer)
9. First Reformed (2018, Paul Schrader)
8. The Blackcoat's Daughter (2017, Osgood Perkins)
7. Inside Out (2015, Pete Docter)
6. Like Father, Like Son (2013, Hirokazu Kore-eda)
5. Tanna (2016, Martin Butler & Bentley Dean)
4. The Social Network (2010, David Fincher)
3. Rabbit Hole (2010, John Cameron Mitchell)
2. Spring Breakers (2013, Harmony Korine)
1. Tangled (2010, Nathan Greno & Byron Howard)

Honorable mentions (listed alphabetically): Before Midnight (2013, Richard Linklater), The Breadwinner (2017, Nora Twomey), Hell or High Water (2016, David Mackenzie), The Last Five Years (2015, Richard LaGravenese), mother! (2017, Darren Aronofsky), Other People (2016, Chris Kelly), Ruby Sparks (2012, Jonathan Dayton & Valerie Faris), The Skeleton Twins (2014, Craig Johnson), Tangerine (2015, Sean Baker), Whiplash (2014, Damien Chazelle)

And here is what Flickchart says it would have been had I made all the same dueling decisions, but was actually entering the films into my Flickchart at the time I saw them, meaning the rankings would have been available mid-January. Included also is their overall ranking out of 5454 films on my Flickchart:

25. Your Sister's Sister (2012, Lynn Shelton) - 233
24. Wonder Woman (2017, Patty Jenkins) - 217
23. Under the Skin (2013, Jonathan Glazer) - 212
22. First Reformed (2018, Paul Schrader) - 211
21. Creed (2015, Ryan Coogler) - 200
20. Portrait of a Lady on Fire (2019, Celine Sciamma) - 193
19. Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015, J.J. Abrams) - 189
18. If Beale Street Could Talk (2018, Barry Jenkins) - 187
17. The Skeleton Twins (2014, Craig Johnson) - 176
16. Toni Erdmann (2016, Maren Ade) - 170
15. Inside Out (2015, Pete Docter) - 164
14. 127 Hours (2010, Danny Boyle) - 160
13. Beyond the Hills (2012, Cristian Mungiu) - 150
12. Ruby Sparks (2012, Jonathan Dayton & Valerie Faris) - 144
11. A Ghost Story (2017, David Lowery) - 143
10. Rabbit Hole (2010, John Cameron Mitchell) - 130
9. Parasite (2019, Bong Joon-ho) - 126
8. The Blackcoat's Daughter (2017, Osgood Perkins) - 118 
7. Inside Llewyn Davis (2013, Joel & Ethan Coen) - 114
6. Tanna (2016, Martin Butler & Bentley Dean) - 113
5. A Separation (2011, Asghar Farhadi) - 92
4. The Social Network (2010, David Fincher) - 91
3. Spring Breakers (2013, Harmony Korine) - 84
2. Like Father, Like Son (2013, Hirokazu Kore-eda) - 73
1. Tangled (2010, Nathan Greno & Byron Howard) - 14

Honorable mentions (listed alphabetically): Before Midnight (2013, Richard Linklater), Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014, Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu), BlacKkKlansman (2018, Spike Lee), Coco (2017, Lee Unkrich), Hell or High Water (2016, David Mackenzie), Ida (2013, Pawel Pawlikowski), Red State (2011, Kevin Smith), Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018, Bob Persichetti, Peter Ramsey & Rodney Rothman), Take Shelter (2011, Jeff Nichols), Winter's Bone (2010, Debra Granik) 

I was thinking of taking these film by film and analyzing the differences, but I've already taken enough of your time on an exercise that primarily interests me, so let's go for more of an overview.

The big similarities

My top ten has seven of the same films on both lists, with three (Tangled, The Social Network and The Blackcoat's Daughter) landing in the exact same spot. It mightn't have worked out this way except that the top two in my organic list, Tangled and Spring Breakers, made jumps into my top 100 in the past couple months through the course of adding the new films, and then dueling between each new add as a palette cleanser. Tangled then made the big jump into my top 20, where I've come to determine it truly belongs. (This is probably a good time to note I have a controlled methodology for adding new films. I will add a film, then engage in a session of random dueling until a lower film beats a higher one, and continue alternating between the two in perpetuity -- until I'm fully caught up, anyway. This ensured, for the purposes of this experiment, that I did not try to artificially inflate the amount of random dueling I was doing, to help whip the rest of my chart into better shape.)

In the rest of the top 25, A Ghost Story, Beyond the Hills, 127 Hours, If Beale Street Could Talk, Toni Erdmann and Portrait of a Lady on Fire all landed within five spots on Flickchart of where I placed them organically on January's list. In the case of Portrait of a Lady on Fire, its current ranking at #20 relfects the certainty I expressed at the time that it belonged higher than #25. Only two weeks after seeing it for my one and only time, I felt I could not place it any higher than #25 at the time. It's at #20 even though I liked it a little less on my second viewing. 

The big differences

There are four movies in my top 25 on Flickchart that did not even make my honorable mentions back in January: Your Sister's Sister, Wonder Woman, Creed and Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Each of these are films I saw at least three times, and five in the case of Star Wars. The first three all came in at #2 of the year they were originally ranked, and when I added them on Flickchart, that glowing sense of them was still in place. Though I still love them, repeated viewings took a bit of the shine off them, such that they could not even crack the honorable mentions. In the case of Star Wars, it always ranked high but then beat a film that was on its way down (Chinatown), allowing it to jump from in the 300s on Flickchart to in the 100s. I hope that will even out a bit over time.

There were three movies that made my organic top 25 that could not crack the honorable mentions when looking only at Flickchart: Boyhood, What Maisie Knew and Zootopia. In fact, they are my 41st, 52nd and 53rd favorite movies of the decade if you go only by Flickchart, with Maisie and Zootopia actually appearing consecutively on my chart at #378 and #379. Boyhood is certainly a case of my appreciation of it increasing over time, now at three total viewings, which brought it to #14 on my organic list -- though it hasn't obviously had the right duels to really make a big jump on Flickchart. The other two I have always loved, but maybe ranked them conservatively to begin with, and they didn't get the right duels either. 

In terms of leaps or drops within the top 25, Inside Llewyn Davis is my #7 on Flickchart but only my #23 on my organic list. Again, it was the fourth viewing that kind of knocked it down a peg in my mind, though it obviously remained high enough to make my top 25. The reverse is true for another four-time viewing, Under the Skin, which is only my #23 on Flickchart but #10 on my organic list. It has not yet gotten the right duels to reflect my increase in appreciation for it over the seven years since I first saw it. Another notable title to discuss is Ruby Sparks, my #12 on Flickchart but only an honorable mention on January's list. I was passionately in love with this film, my #1 of 2012, when I first saw it, as it entered my chart around #90 overall. A steady cooling of those passions has only managed to knock it down to #144, good enough for 12th overall -- which gives you some sense of how long it takes for a film to drop unless you forcibly re-rank it.

Summary

Both lists please me in a way. They are both, in a manner of speaking, a reflection on my favorites in film from the years 2010 to 2019.

You'd think the outcome of this exercise would be to show me the difference between what I think I like and what I actually like. Instead, I think of it as the difference between a snapshot of what I liked in that moment, in January of 2020, and a history of what I liked over the whole decade. I was Flickcharting that whole decade, having started in 2009, so it's useful to see how my tastes progressed, and what evidence remains of my one-time passions. It's valuable to have a record of having loved films like Ruby Sparks, Creed and Wonder Woman, and I think it's good that Flickchart's core mechanisms make it difficult for their light to fade quickly. You should be reminded of the passion you once felt for something, because chances are you were only a little bit wrong about it, not a lot wrong. And if you were a lot wrong, then you can forcibly re-rank it downward, as I did after my viewing of Field of Dreams back in July. 

The other thing that interested me to see about my Flickchart list is that it's more diverse, both in terms of the filmmakers and in terms of the subject matter. Whereas my organic list has only two female directors on it -- Maren Ade and Celine Sciamma -- the Flickchart list has those two along with Patty Jenkins and (the dearly departed) Lynn Shelton, not to mention a half-directing credit for Valerie Faris. It has the same number of African-American directors, but with Ryan Coogler replacing Spike Lee in the main list but Lee still appearing in the honorable mentions, the whole list of 35 has one more Black director on Flickchart. Then there's things like the Flickchart list having a superhero movie (Wonder Woman) and two movies in franchises (Creed and Star Wars: The Force Awakens), while the organic list has none of those, unless you count honorable mention Before Midnight

Okay, exercise complete. I release you. 

Sunday, January 19, 2020

Performers and directors of the decade

Do I really need to do two follow-up posts to my best of the decade post?

Duh.

But this is the last, I promise.

As I was going through my list of 87 movies identified for further reconsideration for my best of the decade (82 of which I ultimately watched), I noticed both actors and directors appearing multiple times across the films. That naturally got the wheels spinning for me to honor them separately, hence this post.

I won't write an additional post this time explaining how I did it, but will give you a little bit on that right here.

For starters, I want to explain that this is not some be-all, end-all examination of who were the "best" actors or actresses (or directors) this past decade. That kind of thing might involve tallying Oscar nominations and the like, and that might be an interesting separate exercise, but that's not what I'm doing today. The honors in this post are based only on which movies I liked the best, so they ignore what I might have thought were great performances in mediocre movies. It seemed like the most effective way to filter and manage a post like this, while also keeping it very subjective to my own tastes.

And yet, there is also a non-subjective element to it. Unlike my "three who had a good year" segments in my year-end wrap-up posts, the methodology I'm using does not allow me to choose one person over another based on more nebulous, slippery criteria. I'm going by sheer number of appearances in my favorite films here, with a little wiggle room based on ties and factors like whether the person's work contributed significantly to my affection for the film. So if a dominant percentage of the actors who recurred in my favorite films are of a particular racial composition -- er, white -- then that isn't the result of a specific choice made by me in January of 2020. It's what the numbers bore out over time. And, I suppose, the cumulative effect of a number of small, individual choices. Hey, what can I say, I watched what I watched and I loved what I loved.

I'll also say that either actors or directors who did good work in 2019 are slightly disadvantaged by my system. If 2019 were a year in the middle of the decade rather than at the end, I'd have longer to figure out if those films were going to endure with me, and I would have reconsidered more of them, possibly even some that landed outside my top ten. I think that's just kind of inevitable with years at the end of the decade. Sorry 2019.

So director was pretty straightforward, as each film has only one of them, or at most two. (Okay, okay, Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse has three.) I put the 87 films in a spreadsheet, slapped the director's name(s) next to each, and sorted by the second column, thereby figuring out who appeared the most. Done and done. As there were only seven directors who had more than one film appear, I had to go outside the 87 in support of the director who appeared as a third honorable mention, but that seemed fair.

Actors were a bit more tricky. I also used a spreadsheet, and I went through the films listing every actor who was either of note or who had any likelihood of appearing in another of my films. For example, I didn't get too hung up on the cast of Tanna (though I did list the two leads) because I knew it was just academic to include them. This meant that some actors got credit for only a very small role in some of their films, but I did my best to account for that as well in breaking ties. In the end, I identified 278 (!) different actors across the 87 films, 240 of whom appeared in only one film.

Tedious. Exhaustive. That's me.

It may go without saying, but if it doesn't, I'll say it now. I didn't penalize anyone for appearing in/making bad films. You could have spent the entire decade making shithouse movies, but if you made two or three that I really loved, you were in. I did decide to mention the moves that may have detracted from their clean records, as you will see, and may have used them once or twice to break a tie. But I was by no means consistent about that.

Okay! Here we go.

Actresses of the decade

1. Emily Blunt 
Considered from the 87: Edge of Tomorrow (2014), Looper (2012), Sicario (2015), Your Sister's Sister (2012)
It was easy enough to award Blunt the accompanying art to this post, as she was the only performer to appear in four films from the original list of 87*. (See all the way at the bottom of this post for explanation of asterisk.) In a weird and surprising phenomenon, though, none of those films appeared in either my top 25 or my honorable mentions. Your Sister's Sister, my #2 of 2012, came closest. That does nothing to tarnish the way Blunt announced herself this decade, becoming one of the most capable A-list stars who you also never worried about in terms of her craft. She mostly played tough, as we would expect from female characters written really carefully nowadays, but I may have found the vulnerability she displayed in Sister to be some of her most affecting work this decade. I find it hard to believe that this talented actress has never earned an Oscar nomination (she was robbed for Sicario), and I hope to see that change in the coming years. Interestingly, her "imperial period" (to borrow a phrase usually reserved for music artists) occurred entirely within a four year span from 2012 to 2015, when all four of the above movies were released. But that's not to say she didn't do good work elsewhere in the decade, as you will see below.
Other notable works this decade: The Five-Year Engagement (2012) (really liked it), Mary Poppins Returns (2018) (liked it), A Quiet Place (2018) (really liked it)
Possible detractorsThe Girl on the Train (2016) (didn't like it), Into the Woods (2014) (hated it)

2. Zoe Kazan
Considered from the 87: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs (2018), Meek's Cutoff (2011), Ruby Sparks (2012)
It may be surprising to see Kazan on this list, especially at #2, but she makes it on quality rather than quantity. Kazan was not in a lot of movies this decade compared to some of her peers -- she also spent some time writing -- but whenever she did appear on screen, she was great. I'm glad to have this opportunity to throw some love to my #1 of 2012, which was the only #1 I left off my top 25 (it was an honorable mention). As both writer and star of Ruby Sparks, Kazan is perhaps more responsible than anyone else for the success of that movie, a sly attack on the lazy screenwriting trope of the manic pixie dream girl. Contrary to what you might think, that was not a role she herself played very often, as her two other choices I considered are oddly similar, both involving characters on long and fateful wagon train trips across country. She may have been a part of the ensemble in Meek's Cutoff, but she carried the brunt of the effectiveness of the best segment of The Ballad of Buster Scruggs, which I was also sorry I could not give any more love before now.
Other notable works this decade: The Big Sick (2017) (liked it), What If (2013) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: The Pretty One (2013) (didn't like it)

3. Scarlett Johansson
Considered for the 87: Isle of Dogs (2018), Under the Skin (2014)
In the end, I really only considered one film where Johansson plays a major role, Under the Skin, in which she is pretty much the entire thing. Her role in Isle of Dogs, kind of a random choice to consider as it was only my #15 of 2018, couldn't really be said to move the needle in that giant ensemble cast. But that doesn't tell the true story of Johansson's decade, one in which I twice named her as one of three "who had a good year" (let's forget the once she was named to "three who had a bad year"). Scarlett Johansson was all over this decade, doing increasingly interesting and increasingly more realistic work as the 2010s went on. We always knew she could play a fembot -- that's pretty much the role in Under the Skin -- but her Oscar nomination for Marriage Story was based purely on her ability to portray an actual person. So when looking to why Scarlett Johansson makes this list, we may have to look more to the films down below this text than those above it.
Other notable works this decade: Avengers: Endgame (2019) (loved it), Captain America: Civil War (2016) (loved it), Her (2013) (really liked it), Jojo Rabbit (2019) (loved it), Marriage Story (2019) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Ghost in the Shell (2017) (didn't like it), Rough Night (2017) (didn't like it)

4. Nicole Kidman
Considered from the 87: The Killing of a Sacred Deer (2017), Rabbit Hole (2010)
I may have really fallen in love with the acting skills of Nicole Kidman last decade, after following the rest of the world and pretty much snubbing her for the first 10-15 years of her career. But she came on strong at the start of the 2010s by giving perhaps my favorite naturalistic performance of the decade in Rabbit Hole. That didn't mean she couldn't still groove to the kind of weirdness she found with Stanley Kubrick in Eyes Wide Shut or with Jonathan Glazer in Birth. She teamed up with Yorgos Lanthimos for The Killing of a Sacred Deer and played a perfect type of sultry ice princess (if you'll go with me on that possibility) who isn't quite knowable. Kidman likes to work so her choices haven't always worked for me (Just Go With It, anyone?), but she has continued raising the bar throughout the decade, perhaps most notably in places I have yet to see her (Big Little Lies). My kinship with her is such that I feel defensive on her behalf when people snipe at her about plastic surgery or whatever other things they think she's guilty of. If Kidman really is worried about her age, she needn't be. At 52, she still looks great, but that doesn't matter, because those skills translate at any age.
Other notable works from decade: The Beguiled (2017) (loved it), The Family Fang (2015) (really liked it), Lion (2016) (loved it), The Paperboy (2012) (liked it)
Possible detractors: Just Go With It (2011) (didn't like it)

5. Jennifer Lawrence 
Considered from the 87: mother! (2017), Winter's Bone (2010)
It’s hard to believe that Jennifer Lawrence is someone we have known for only ten years, as her entire known career falls within this past decade. Winter’s Bone may not have actually been her first professional work, but it was the first time most people had ever seen her – unless you watched (ahem) The Bill Engvall Show. She went on to be nominated for four Oscars over the course of the next decade, winning one. Lawrence’s toughness and girl-next-door authenticity were both on display in Winter’s Bone, but my favorite performance she gave this decade might be the one where she had her bearings the least. Darren Aronofsky’s mother! subjects her to nearly von Trierian levels of sadism in a story about how a young bride’s life is falling apart after her famous older husband starts losing interest in her, which is only one of a kajillion interpretations of the film. There’s no other way to interpret the performance of Lawrence than brilliant as she looks on in horror at the social contract exploding around her, and her house becoming the site of nothing less than biblical apocalypse. It’s sad to me that Lawrence has taken a step back from the spotlight as I am interested every time I see her name attached to a project. 
Other notable works this decade: American Hustle (liked it), The Hunger Games (2012) (really liked it), Silver Linings Playbook (2012) (loved it), X-Men: First Class (2011) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Joy (2015) (didn't like it), X-Men: Dark Phoenix (2019) (hated it)

Honorable mentions

1. Rooney Mara
Considered from the 87: A Ghost Story (2017), The Social Network (2010)
Other notable works this decade: Ain't Them Bodies Saints (2013) (liked it), Carol (2015) (liked it), The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo (2011) (really liked it), Her (really liked it), Side Effects (2013) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Mary Magdalene (2018) (didn't like it), Pan (2015) (hated it)

2. Emma Stone
Considered from the 87: Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (2014), La La Land (2016)
Other notable works this decade: Battle of the Sexes (2017) (really liked it), Crazy, Stupid, Love (2011) (loved it), Easy A (2010) (really liked it), The Favourite (2018) (really liked it), The Help (2011) (liked it), Magic in the Moonlight (2014) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Aloha (2015) (didn't like it), Irrational Man (2015) (hated it), Movie 43 (2013) (hated it), Zombieland: Double Tap (2019) (didn't like it)

3. Kristen Wiig
Considered from the 87: mother! (2017), The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (2013), The Skeleton Twins (2014)
Other notable works this decade: Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues (2013) (really liked it), Bridesmaids (2011) (loved it), Date Night (2010) (really liked it), The Diary of a Teenage Girl (2015) (loved it), Ghostbusters (2016) (liked it), Her (2013) (really liked it), How to Train Your Dragon (2010) (really liked it), The Martian (2015) (really liked it), Masterminds (2016) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Hateship, Loveship (2013) (didn't like it), Nasty Baby (2015) (hated it), Where'd You Go, Bernadette (2019) (didn't like it)  

Actors of the decade

1. Ethan Hawke
Considered from the 87: Before Midnight (2013), Boyhood (2014), First Reformed (2018)
It was a pretty straightforward choice to select Hawke as my #1 for the decade, as he appeared in three films I considered, all of which made either my top 25 or my honorable mentions. He has Richard Linklater to thank for two of those, and as you saw in yesterday’s post, Before Midnight was the “first alternate,” in other words, the last movie to get knocked out of my top 25. But as much as I appreciate the lived-in naturalism of the performances Hawke gives for Linklater, his collaborator for more than 20 years now, I think my favorite Hawke performance of the decade was the slightly more stylized one he gave for Paul Schrader in First Reformed. That’s not to say his portrayal of Ernst Toller is not naturalistic, but it’s a kind of heightened naturalism consistent with Schrader’s willingness to stray from realism when it suits him. I was really hoping Hawke would get Oscar nominated for that performance, which would have been only his third, but at least many other critics groups recognized his work. Hawke has been a consummate professional throughout his 35-year career and I know he’s always interested in breaking the boundaries of narrative cinema. It’s why I’m always interested in seeing his name attached to a new project. 
Other notable works this decade: Daybreakers (2010) (really liked it), Maggie's Plan (2015) (really liked it), Predestination (2014) (liked it), Sinister (2012) (really liked it), Valerian and the City of a Thousand Planets (2017) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: The Purge (2013) (hated it), Regression (2017) (didn't like it)

2. James Franco
Considered from the 87: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs (2018), 127 Hours (2010), Spring Breakers (2013)
James Franco is not a good guy, but hey, I don’t make the rules. Okay, I do make the rules, but I’m happy to include Franco based on the way his performance dominated (in a good way) two of my favorite movies of the decade. You can’t imagine either 127 Hours or Spring Breakers with any other actor, not because another actor could not do it – okay, I don’t know that another actor could do Alien – but because he put such a stamp on those roles that they don’t deserve to be in anyone else’s hands. The thing that blows my mind most about Alien is not that he preens like a gangsta, it’s that he’s actually a scared little boy preening like a gangsta, which most actors would not have thought to bring to that role. 127 Hours features a guy who is scared in a different way and is nearly being driven out of his mind from hunger and exhaustion, which Franco expresses perfectly. He’s not hugely important one way or another to The Ballad of Buster Scruggs so that’s just gravy. The much-deserved shaming of Franco in the latter half of this decade was disappointing to me not because I feel an inherent warmth toward the man, but because it means that going forward, he won’t likely get the same opportunities to give us more performances like these. 
Other notable works this decadeDate Night (2010) (really liked it), The Disaster Artist (2017) (really liked it), Howl (2010) (really liked it), The Interview (2014) (loved it), Oz the Great and Powerful (2013) (loved it), This is the End (2013) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Rise of the Planet of the Apes (2011) (didn't like it), Why Him? (2016) (hated it)

3. Adam Driver 
Considered from the 87: BlacKkKlansman (2018), Inside Llewyn Davis (2013), Lincoln (2012), Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015)
Adam Driver may be the most interesting case on this whole list as he packed a decade’s worth of good performances into essentially a half-decade. Okay, Inside Llewyn Davis isn’t the second half of the decade, but I love his performance as Al Cody more in retrospect than I really recognized it at the time. (“Outer … SPACE!”) Speaking of outer space, it was when he emerged as Kylo Ren in 2015 that I started to appreciate the things that had eluded me about Driver when I first encountered him on Girls (the few episodes I watched). Three excellent turns as the unhinged spawn of Han and Leia really sold me on his innate skills that go well beyond his kind of mumblecore beginnings. This is the way Hayden Christensen wished he could have played Anakin Skywalker. Then my Driver lovefest was bolstered by his work with Spike Lee in BlacKkKlansman, in which he has to act the part of a guy who’s acting a part, which is no mean feat. At decade’s end I feel like I want Adam Driver to be in every new movie that gets made, and the rest of the world is catching up to me as he has now been nominated for Oscars in consecutive years.
Other notable works this decade: Frances Ha (2012) (loved it), J. Edgar (2011) (really liked it), Marriage Story (2019) (really liked it), Paterson (2016) (loved it), Silence (2016) (liked it), Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) (really liked it), While We're Young (2014) (liked it)
Possible detractors: The Dead Don't Die (2019) (hated it), The Man Who Killed Don Quixote (2019) (didn't like it)

4. Paul Dano
Considered from the 87: Looper (2012), Meek's Cutoff (2011), Ruby Sparks (2012)
If we went back to the start of the century, Paul Dano would be even higher than this, but he doesn’t get to count movies like The Girl Next Door and There Will Be Blood for this decade. That said, the films he does get to count are quite solid, and his power coupling with Zoe Kazan (I just looked, they’re still together!) gets its second entrant on this list. Paul Dano has been kind of John Cusack’s heir apparent as the “weird looking” everyman leading man, which is appropriate as he and Cusack played the same character in Love & Mercy, a film that I could have revisited by virtue of it landing at #4 for me in 2015, but decided to rule it out from the start. He used those traits to their fullest in Ruby Sparks, but his intense desperation has been present in all of his roles this decade, from Looper to Swiss Army Man (another top ten movie I pre-emptively ruled out) to Meek’s Cutoff. He’s pursued other interests the last few years, making his feature directing debut with a film I did not like, Wildlife. Here’s hoping he gets back to what he does best.
Other notable works this decade: Love & Mercy (2015) (loved it), Okja (2017) (really liked it), Prisoners (2013) (really liked it), Swiss Army Man (2016) (loved it), 12 Years a Slave (2013) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Cowboys & Aliens (2011) (hated it), Wildlife (2018) (as director) (didn't like it)

5. Chris Pine
Considered from the 87: Hell or High Water (2016), Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018), Wonder Woman (2017)
Captain Kirk was the role that really put Chris Pine on the map at the end of last decade, but that isn’t even where he’s shone in this one. He really demonstrated the range of his abilities in performances both essentially Kirk-like (funny and charming, the way he is in Wonder Woman) and those that are pretty much the exact opposite of that (laconic and world-weary, the way he is in Hell or High Water). In fact, Pine is so good in Hell or High Water – though he’s not the only one – that I was kind of shocked when the movie couldn’t find its way into my top 25 of the decade, settling for an honorable mention. His role in Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is a lot more brief, and at first I kind of wished they’d given him Jake Johnson’s role until I saw how good Johnson was. The point is, at this point, I’ve decided beyond a shadow of a doubt who is the “best Chris” out of him, Hemsworth, Pratt and Evans. Just as he charmed the pants off of Gal Gadot, he’s charmed the pants off me, and that’s not even the only mode he has – not nearly.
Other notable works this decade: Horrible Bosses 2 (2014) (liked it), Star Trek Into Darkness (2012) (liked it), Z for Zachariah (2015) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: Into the Woods (2014) (hated it), A Wrinkle in Time (2018) (didn't like it)

Honorable mentions

1. Oscar Isaac
Considered from the 87: Inside Llewyn Davis (2013), Star Wars: The Force Awakens (2015)
Other notable works this decade: Annihilation (2018) (really liked it), Drive (2011) (liked it), Ex Machina (2015) (loved it), A Most Violent Year (2014) (liked it), Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (2019) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: The Addams Family (2019) (didn't like it), X-Men: Apocalypse (2016) (didn't like it)  

2. Javier Bardem
Considered from the 87: Everybody Knows (2018), mother! (2017)
Other notable works this decade: Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Men Tell No Tales (2017) (liked it), Skyfall (2012) (liked it), To the Wonder (2013) (really liked it)
Possible detractors: The Counselor (2013) (didn't like it), The Last Face (2017) (hated it)

3. Mahershala Ali
Considered from the 87: Moonlight (2016), Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (2018)
Other notable works this decade: Green Book (2018) (liked it), Hidden Figures (2016) (liked it), The Place Beyond the Pines (2013) (liked it)
Possible detractors: Alita: Battle Angel (2019) (didn't like it)

Directors of the decade

1. Asghar Farhadi
Considered from the 87: Everybody Knows (2018), The Past (2013), A Separation (2011)
Farhadi easily wins the decade by being the only director who had three films that I considered for the decade’s best. What’s more, the fourth film he released this past decade – 2016’s The Salesman – won the best foreign language film Oscar, giving him two (along with A Separation). That I think this film is only mediocre is an indication of just how successful Farhadi has been. (Or maybe I’m still just mad at the movie for stealing the Oscar that rightfully belonged to Toni Erdmann.) When you consider that his 2009 film, About Elly, was also unearthed and made more generally available this decade, and that it is also a masterpiece, you have a truly staggering body of work to grapple with. Two other factors contribute to making these ten years all the more astonishing for Farhadi: 1) He’s an Iranian director, yet somehow avoided the type of government scrutiny that torpedoed fellow countryman Jafar Panahi, while still making films that seem pointed in their criticism of Iranian society; 2) He directed films in three different languages, those being Persian, French and Spanish. What a decade. 
Other works this decade: The Salesman (2016) (liked it)

2. Richard Linklater 
Considered from the 87: Before Midnight (2013), Boyhood (2014)
Linklater came within a hair of getting two films in my top 25, which would have made him one of only two directors to do that (see my #3), and only the third to do it in the history of these decade-end lists (Cameron Crowe had two in my top ten last decade, if you can believe it). But just because I decided Before Midnight was only my #26, it doesn’t take away from a decade of critical acclaim and exquisite invention for Linklater. It was impressive enough when he submitted his third entry in the best “aging along with the characters” series since Michael Apted’s Up movies. But then, as something of a surprise, the very next year he told everyone he’d been working on a movie for the past 12 years using the same four actors at different ages. Who does that? The answer is, the guy who last decade was experimenting with rotoscoping, which allowed him to put Waking Life on my last best of the decade list. Linklater has never been flashy with his technique (unless, of course, he’s using rotoscoping), but he has established himself as able to convey thoughtful humanism like few of his peers. He’s also great with nostalgia, as exemplified in one of the other movies below.
Other works this decade: Bernie (2011) (really liked it), Everybody Wants Some!! (2016) (really liked it), Last Flag Flying (2018) (haven't seen it), Where'd You Go, Bernadette (2019) (didn't like it)

3. Byron Howard 
Considered from the 87: Tangled (2010), Zootopia (2016)
Who? Exactly. And that explains why the only man to get two movies in my top 25 for the decade is only my third-best director for the decade (and why I haven't mentioned this feat in either of my previous decade-end posts). It's hard for most people, including myself, to understand exactly what role a director has in bringing an animated movie to the screen, since animation is one arena in which we don't typically think of the director as the primary auteur. In fact, the director rarely even has sole credit, and that was the case with Howard in each of his movies that made my top 25. But the fact remains that whether with Nathan Greno on Tangled or Rich Moore on Zootopia, Howard helped make two absolutely fantastic 2010s animated movies a reality. Did he tell the actors how to say their lines? Did he suggest how to "set up the camera"? To the first, probably yes; to the second, I have no idea. But without Byron Howard, I do know that it's a far less rich decade for animated movies. And hey, at the very least, we know he can hold a stuffed animal. 
Other works this decade: None

4. Barry Jenkins
Considered from the 87: If Beale Street Could Talk (2018), Moonlight (2016)
I greatly regretted that I couldn’t summon more affection than I did for Moonlight. I placed it in my top ten for 2016, at #10, but I felt like there might have been films below it where my personal affection was slightly higher (sorry, Hello My Name is Doris). If the whole film remained at the high level of its first third, which showcased a director I’d never heard of (Barry Jenkins) and all that this “newcomer” possesses in terms of craft, it’d have been my #1 of that year. I did revisit Moonlight for this project to be sure I didn’t actually love it (I didn’t), but there was no artificial inflation when it came to If Beale Street Could Talk, which floored me the first time and then pushed me through the floor into the earth on the second. Here Jenkins’ skills were matched with a story that was overall more resonant with me, and it left me in a near-stupor state. Moonlight would have probably resonated with me just as much if it had kept its momentum from the Mahershala Ali-led first act, which only goes to show that not only can Barry Jenkins pick ‘em, he can film ‘em too. 
Other works this decade: None

5. Gaspar Noe
Considered from the 87: Climax (2018), Enter the Void (2010)
Gaspar Noe made three films this decade, two of which I saw twice, and I also twice watched his one movie from last decade, Irreversible. That means I was never long without the singular weirdness of this French filmmaker, who is known for putting his entire closing credits – often smashed at the screen in crazy fonts, and with strobe lights and industrial music – at the beginning of the film rather than the end. Each Noe film thereby introduces you to the fact that you’re in for a ride, and a ride is what you get. Not only is his subject matter always shocking – graphically sexual in nature when it is not graphically violent, and sometimes both at once – but he films it in a way you’ve literally never seen before. Most of Enter the Void is shot from above, from the angle of a wandering spirit flying over the city of Tokyo. In Love, you get a head-on view of a penis ejaculating. In Climax, the camera goes literally everywhere, in such a manner that the only way I could think to describe it in my review was that it seemed to be on a fishing rod dangling over its subjects. I’m not sure how Noe does what he does, but I love it. 
Other works this decade: Love (2015) (liked it)

Honorable mentions

1. Joel & Ethan Coen
Considered from the 87: The Ballad of Buster Scruggs (2018), Inside Llewyn Davis (2013)
Other works this decade: Hail, Caesar! (2016) (didn't like it), True Grit (2010) (liked it)

2. Damien Chazelle
Considered from the 87: La La Land (2016), Whiplash (2014)
Other works this decade: First Man (2018) (really liked it)

3. Bong Joon-ho
Considered from the 87Parasite (2019)
Other works this decade: Okja (2017) (really liked it), Snowpiercer (2013) (loved it)

Okay! That'll do.

Thanks for tuning in to a full week of year-end and decade-end writing. Tomorrow I will look forward to 2020 in a very explicit way by introducing you to what I'm going to be watching as a monthly series this year.

Oh, and here's that asterisk I promised you earlier:

* - I only belatedly noticed that Adam Driver also appeared in four of the 87 movies when I determined he had a small role in Lincoln. I had already written most of this post at that point, so I did not adjust my perspective mid-stream and allowed Blunt to keep the spotlight to herself. 

Saturday, January 18, 2020

How the sausage gets made: My 18-month road to the decade's best

Thanks for reading my best of the decade post yesterday. Now, to take you farther behind the scenes than you ever dreamed or wanted.

You don’t really need to know all the ins and outs about how I run my blog or, more to the point, how I make my movie lists, but I thought you’d be interested in learning about something I’ve been up to for the past 18 months without ever telling you about it. 

I enjoyed so much the project of identifying my best of the last decade in late 2009/early 2010 that I have been looking ahead to the end of this decade for several years now. That list was put together under some duress, over a period of maybe a couple weeks and no more than six weeks at the very longest. That meant maybe only ten rewatches to confirm my ongoing affection for the contenders, and then a bunch of movies I just slotted in based on my memory of them. Even rewatching those ten was complicated by the fact that I was also trying to finish watching 2009 movies, and I remember my wife getting annoyed at my lack of availability during those several weeks.

I wanted to be a lot more scientific -- or maybe just a lot more exhaustive -- as well as more available to my wife -- this time around.

So sometime in the summer of 2018 (winter of 2018 in Australia), I put together a list of contending films to rewatch for this best of the decade list. I did this by combing my year-by-year list of movies seen. Not my rankings, since those included only movies I saw in time to rank them, but rather, the ongoing lists I keep adding to every time I see a movie from a given release year. Some of those – particularly the years when I was watching movies for the Human Rights & Arts Film Festival (HRAFF) – have upwards of 230 titles in them, or maybe 80 more than I actually ranked that year.

My goal was to identify this list of contenders and then spend the year 2019 watching at least one per week. But the list of contenders was nearly 90 films long, or ended up at nearly 90 films after I inevitably added 2019 films and contenders seen for the first time in 2019. So I had to start earlier than this past January if I wanted any hope of fitting them all in.

So I started watching them not long after I came up with the list, even though it was not yet 2019. Hey, no time is too early to start on a project like this, even if means I might want to watch some titles a second time before all was said and done. I actually ended up watching three of these movies -- mother!, First Reformed and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse -- twice, though sometimes for other reasons. I didn’t hold myself to the standard of at least one per week until the start of 2019.

So instead of giving you a total alphabetical list, I’ll show you the movies I watched in order and with the date I watched them, then follow that up with the ones I couldn’t reconsider for whatever reason. I've only listed one of the two viewings, the "official viewing," for the movies I rewatched twice. If you’re curious, this also functions as sort of an extended honorable mentions from yesterday’s post, though as it turned out, my feelings toward certain films dropped enough on rewatch that I liked them less than certain titles I chose not to consider. Hey, my initial estimate of movies is not always unimpeachable.

So here that is:

  1. Moonlight (7/16/2018)
  2. Animal Kingdom (7/27/2018)
  3. Meek’s Cutoff (8/29/2018)
  4. The Killing of a Sacred Deer (9/11/2018)
  5. Melancholia (9/28/2018)
  6. Coco (10/13/2018)
  7. Beyond the Black Rainbow (10/19/2018)
  8. mother! (11/23/2018)
  9. First Reformed (11/30/18)
  10. Queen of Earth (12/13/18)
  11. Tangerine (1/6/19)
  12. The Ballad of Buster Scruggs (1/9/19)
  13. Your Sister’s Sister (1/16/19)
  14. Edge of Tomorrow (1/26/19)
  15. Hell or High Water (2/2/19)
  16. 127 Hours (2/8/19)
  17. Zootopia (2/10/19)
  18. Toni Erdmann (2/17/19)
  19. Sicario (2/22/19)
  20. Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows – Part 2 (3/1/19)
  21. The Last Five Years (3/5/19)
  22. What Maisie Knew (3/13/19)
  23. Lincoln (3/19/19)
  24. Moneyball (3/28/19)
  25. Nocturnal Animals (3/29/19)
  26. Isle of Dogs (3/30/19)
  27. Inside Out (3/31/19)
  28. Before Midnight (4/8/19)
  29. Boyhood (4/8/19)
  30. Like Father, Like Son (4/16/19)
  31. Whiplash (4/24/19)
  32. A Ghost Story (5/1/19)
  33. Gimme the Loot (5/7/19)
  34. A Separation (5/15/19)
  35. La La Land (5/19/19)
  36. The Lost City of Z (5/20/19)
  37. Climax (5/24/19)
  38. Love is Strange (5/28/19)
  39. Exit Through the Gift Shop (6/5/19)
  40. Take Shelter (6/12/19)
  41. Winter’s Bone (6/18/19)
  42. Ida (6/24/19)
  43. The Handmaiden (6/28/19)
  44. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (7/1/19)
  45. The Social Network (7/9/19)
  46. In a World … (7/16/19)
  47. Under the Skin (7/20/19)
  48. Beyond the Hills (7/24/19)
  49. The Hateful Eight (8/2/19)
  50. Berberian Sound Studio (8/7/19)
  51. BlacKkKlansman (8/13/19)
  52. Ruby Sparks (8/23/19)
  53. Everybody Knows (8/31/19)
  54. Rabbit Hole (9/3/19)
  55. Looper (9/13/19)
  56. Other People (9/17/19)
  57. Red State (9/27/19)
  58. Another Earth (10/3/19)
  59. Stories We Tell (10/7/19)
  60. What We Do in the Shadows (10/12/19)
  61. Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance) (10/18/19)
  62. Wonder Woman (10/18/19)
  63. The Secret Life of Walter Mitty (10/19/19)
  64. The Breadwinner (10/19/19)
  65. The Skeleton Twins (10/20/19)
  66. The Blackcoat’s Daughter (10/25/19)
  67. Upstream Color (11/1/19)
  68. Enter the Void (11/2/19)
  69. The Hunt (11/10/19)
  70. Creed (11/14/19)
  71. Parasite (11/14/19)
  72. If Beale Street Could Talk (11/22/19)
  73. Killing Them Softly (11/28/19)
  74. Your Name. (11/29/19)
  75. Four Lions (12/6/19)
  76. Inside Llewyn Davis (12/7/19)
  77. Tanna (12/9/19)
  78. Star Wars: The Force Awakens (12/14/19)
  79. The Past (12/21/19)
  80. Crazy Rich Asians (12/27/19)
  81. Tangled (12/30/19)
  82. Spring Breakers (12/30/19)
As you can see, that made for a total of 82 films I was able to rewatch before I cut it off at the end of 2019. I had an alphabetical list I was working from, and each time I’d see one I’d cross it off with the strikethrough feature on Microsoft Word (fun) and add it to the list you see above. If you examine those dates closely, you can see there were some times I was able to binge decade rewatches, such as my birthday weekend in October, when I watched five of them. And if you really do want to audit those dates, you’ll see I never failed to watch at least one movie in a calendar week, which I defined as Monday to Sunday, including the weeks I was out of the country on vacation or for family purposes. Go me.

As you can see, I saved my ultimate #1 and #2 for a double feature on the second-to-last night of the year, knowing they would be my #1 and #2 but not knowing which would be which.

I also short-listed but couldn’t watch the following:

The Arbor (2011, Clio Barnard) – One of my top ten of 2011, I simply could not find this anywhere. Unwilling to pirate, I left it out. Probably not a realistic contender anyway.

BPM (Beats Per Minute) (2017, Robin Campillo) – This I fully intended to rewatch, even though I’d only just seen it for the first time earlier in the year. However, I brought only its case with me to Tasmania at Christmastime, a fact I realized only once I’d gotten there. I had taken that DVD out of its case to test our DVD player when we were having a problem with it, and I never returned it. This meant I missed my window of opportunity to see BPM and also that I had to find a substitute or else risk not successfully seeing at least one contender every week of the year. Fortunately, our Tasmania holiday house had Crazy Rich Asians, a film I loved and had already seen twice, but had considered too frivolous to seriously consider it for my top 25 of the decade. But it actually deserved to be considered and it ended up advancing to the next stage, as you will see shortly. As for BPM, I really liked it but if I'm being honest with myself, it was not going to make it to the final 25.

Capharnaum (2018, Nadine Labaki) – I turned on this a little after my fellow podcasters did not like it as much as I did, but I ultimately never found this available for rental. I did not want to purchase it when I thought it probably was not that strong of a contender in the end.

Three Windows and a Hanging (2014, Isa Qosja) – This was a film I watched for HRAFF, but it was always obscure, and predictably, I could not find it. Again, not a serious contender, maybe, but something I wanted to shortlist nonetheless.

Vivarium (2019, Lorcan Finnegan) – As you saw if you read yesterday’s post, this has not had a theatrical release yet and I’ve already decided I might consider it for the best of the 2020s.

I also briefly had Toy Story 3 on my list, but removed it when I was honest with myself and decided that outside of the very ending, which makes me cry like a baby, I don’t love this movie enough for it to be a serious contender.

Just a few words on the watching itself. I plucked movies from a number of different sources, from my own collection to Netflix to iTunes to Stan (our Australian streaming service) to Kanopy (the free streaming service associated with the public library system) to library rentals themselves. Perhaps my most innovative rewatch was seeing Peter Strickland's Berberian Sound Studio when it played at MIFF as part of a retrospective of Strickland's work, which I wrote about at the time. Strickland was a big surprise omission from decade-end honors as he got two films in my top ten in the years of their release (Berberian and The Duke of Burgundy) but I steadily soured on those films just a bit (it occurred on my second viewing of Burgundy but not until my third of Berberian). Perhaps fitting as he ended the decade with what I consider to be sort of a turkey, 2019's In Fabric.

So the next step in the process was to whittle this list of 82 down to 50 films that I would duel on Flickchart in order to determine my top 25, with the next ten being my alphabetical list of honorable mentions. I eyeballed the list and eliminated the 20+ movies I knew had not impressed me enough on rewatch, then more regretfully shaved of the remaining strong titles that I knew were not quite strong enough to be serious contenders.

In order to begin dueling the remaining contenders, I created a Flickchart account specifically for the purposes of this project, containing only those 50 films. As it turned out, it ended up being 51. That’s because just a couple hours after I finalized this list of 50 on the morning of December 31st, I saw Portrait of a Lady on Fire, which ended up as my #2 of 2019 and actually ended up making my top 25 of the decade, as you will remember if you read yesterday’s post. Instead of bouncing one of the other contenders, I just added it.

Once I had these films added to Flickchart, I dueled them in my down moments for the next two weeks. It took a while to get the films in a semblance of the correct spots, in part because Flickchart’s algorithm is a bit goofy sometimes, meaning it will present the same duels several times within a space of 50 duels, and then never duel certain other films. For example, I got Tangled to be my #2 and Spring Breakers to be my #1, but a duel between those two movies never came up organically, so Tangled never had its natural opportunity to beat Spring Breakers and leap-frog into the #1 spot. (As this was something I’d already decided after that double feature on the final night.) The only way I finally got that to happen was by choosing the option to re-rank Tangled, which results in a series of duels involving Tangled and another movie, and is the only surefire way to force a particular film all the way to #1 on your chart. Using this same method helped fix the correct rankings for other films.

I had set my sights on duelling these films 5,000 times. That would remove any doubt that I had really thought this through. But as it turned out, I either didn’t have enough time or didn’t budget enough time. I also started to lose some of my enthusiasm when I had duelled two particular films for the 37th time, while still never getting certain other duels. But by this point, I had arrived at the correct relative position for my films either by chance or by force, so the full 5,000 were not needed.

After 2,196 duels, I came up with the following order. The top 25 should look familiar to you. The next ten are honorable mentions, but this shows you the order that they appeared, which you didn’t get from yesterday’s post. And then the last 16 are films I hated not to recognize in any way. They are now getting their moment in the sun.

  1. Tangled
  2. Spring Breakers
  3. Rabbit Hole
  4. The Social Network
  5. Tanna
  6. Like Father, Like Son
  7. Inside Out
  8. The Blackcoat’s Daughter
  9. First Reformed
  10. Under the Skin
  11. Beyond the Hills
  12. A Ghost Story
  13. Parasite
  14. Boyhood
  15. A Separation
  16. If Beale Street Could Talk
  17. 127 Hours
  18. Zootopia
  19. What Maisie Knew
  20. Toni Erdmann
  21. Birdman or (The Unexpected Virtue of Ignorance)
  22. Red State
  23. Inside Llewyn Davis
  24. BlacKkKlansman
  25. Portrait of a Lady on Fire
  26. Before Midnight
  27. The Breadwinner
  28. Tangerine
  29. The Skeleton Twins
  30. Ruby Sparks
  31. The Last Five Years
  32. Hell or High Water
  33. Whiplash
  34. mother!
  35. Other People
  36. The Lost City of Z
  37. Coco
  38. Wonder Woman
  39. Melancholia
  40. Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse
  41. Your Sister’s Sister
  42. The Ballad of Buster Scruggs
  43. The Past
  44. Creed
  45. Four Lions
  46. Star Wars: The Force Awakens
  47. Everybody Knows
  48. Climax
  49. Enter the Void
  50. Exit Through the Gift Shop
  51. Crazy Rich Asians

I especially hated not to recognize my two Gaspar Noe films, Climax and Enter the Void, though as #48 and #49 their top 25 prospects were pretty clear, and my #2-ranked genre films from 2015 and 2017, Creed and Wonder Woman, which were very important to me in their respective years but have suffered just a tad on further reflection. Shout out also to Coco and Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse, the two animation stragglers in what was truly an excellent decade for animation.

Okay, almost done here, but I did want to finish with a few stats, since there is no better place to put them.

Top 25 by year:

2010 – 4
2011 – 2
2012 – 1
2013 – 4
2014 – 3
2015 – 1
2016 – 3
2017 – 2
2018 – 3
2019 – 2

Films from 2010 made up three of my top four of the decade, giving credence to the notion that having the time to allow a film to sit with me is an important factor in my love for it. However, this theory is not necessarily borne out over the rest of the top 25. The years 2011 and 2012 yielded only three movies combined before we jump back up to four in 2013. Plus, every year from 2016 onward had at least two films, so maybe that’s the point where recency bias starts to play more of a role.

I didn’t specifically set this as a requirement this time, but last time I ensured that each year of the decade would be represented among the top 25 at least once. I was grateful to see that this occurred organically. I should say, however, that each ranking year was not represented at least once. By relegating my #1 of 2012, Ruby Sparks, to only an honorable mention, making it my only #1 not to make the top 25 (just like last decade when only Gosford Park failed to make the cut), 2012’s list got shut out of the top 25 entirely. However, because my #1 of 2013 (and #11 of the decade), Beyond the Hills, was a 2012 release in Romania, that got it in on a technicality as a representative for 2012. The funny thing is, I was really passionate about my movies in 2012, so much so that I was inspired, for the very first time, to write the wrap-up post that is now my traditional day-after follow-up to announcing my best of the year. So who knows.

Some more extraneous info:

Movie year represented most in my top 25 – 2010 & 2013 (4 films)
Movie year represented least in my top 25 – 2012 & 2015 (1 film)
Movie year represented most in the 87 films I had hoped to rewatch  – 2013 (13 films)
Movie year represented least in the 87 films I had hoped to rewatch  – 2019 (2 films)
Movie year represented least in the 87 films I had hoped to rewatch, without the asterisk of being the last year of the decade – 2012 (7 films)
Only film in my top 25 that I did not see in time to rank it in its ranking year (though I did see it in the theater): If Beale Street Could Talk
Only film in my top 25 that I only saw once: Portrait of a Lady on Fire
Lowest original ranking for a film I considered a best of the decade contender – What We Do in the Shadows (#41 in 2014)
Top 25 films I saw for the first time in the theater – 21
Top 25 films I saw for the first time on video – 4, but three in my top ten

If you’re still reading, you may be my mother, or a stalker I’ve never known about. But assuming you are not one of those, I’ll let you go now.

Thanks for reading. One final decade wrap-up post tomorrow, then we’re on to 2020 and back to normal posts.