Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2024. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 5, 2025

Lucky #26

When I said that was it for Oscars talk, I meant it ... but then after going to bed I thought of a couple things that I hadn't fit into my hurried reactions post. (Plus, it's not like I've been talking your ear off about the Oscars. In fact, they barely got a mention on this blog after I initially reacted to the nominations.)

Whichever film finishes 2025 as my 26th favorite movie of the year, they should feel happy, because it means they've got a good shot at winning best picture.

I mentioned in yesterday's post that Anora was my #26 of 2024 ... but so too was Oppenheimer my #26 of 2023.

It's a recent phenomenon for sure. If I glance over the other best picture winners since I started ranking my movies in 1996, they fall into three categories: much higher than #26 (I've had three #1s win best picture, which are Titanic, Birdman and Parasite), much lower than #26 (Nomadland was #82, Green Book was #69), or not seen at all by the time of the awards (12 Years a Slave and CODA, both of which I could not see in time to rank them). 

Number 26 is an interesting middle ground. It acknowledges that I think the film is good, maybe even very good, but there are usually at least a handful of best picture nominees I like better. This year, there were seven, as I had a whopping six in my top ten. Only A Complete Unknown did I dislike more, if you want to put it in the negative rather than the positive sense. (I still haven't seen I'm Still Here.)

But there's also a kind of message to it, whether intentional or not, and I appear to have been sending that message to both Oppenheimer and Anora. The top 25 makes an interesting cutoff, or at least, I think of it that way because my friend who does the ranking exercise with me used to highlight his top 25 before sending his whole list. He's scaled that back to his top 20 now, but the line of demarcation between #25 and #26 still feels like it means something. And to the extent that I apply intentionality to anything I do with my bigger list, making a movie #26 says to me "I get this movie is respected, and I liked it quite a lot too, but I have problems with it."

Apparently, that is the type of movie that wins best picture.

Since we own Anora, my wife is going to watch it this weekend when I'm out of town. So we'll see what she thinks.

A Complete shutout

Only two best picture nominees did not pick up a single Oscar: Nickel Boys, my #10, which wasn't nominated in enough categories to have a real chance, and A Complete Unknown, which received eight nominations ... and won not a one of them.

Sweet, sweet justice.

You may remember that I did not care for A Complete Unknown. It was my 128th ranked movie of the year, out of 177. Granted, it was also the last movie I ranked. But I don't know if my opinion would have improved significantly if I'd been given more time to think about it. Maybe 119th. 

So like what happened a couple years ago when The Fabelmans, which I also did not like, didn't win anything, I'm feeling like a necessary correction occurred here. I was bracing for Timothee Chalamet to win the best actor statue, and although I tend to prefer when the wealth is shared for Oscars, meaning I would have supported that win, I'd much rather have the (better) work by Adrien Brody recognized, even if means his second turn in that spotlight.

Then there were three nominations for ACU, other than best picture, that I thought were completely unwarranted: best supporting actress for Monica Barbaro, best supporting actor for Edward Norton, and best director for James Mangold. All of those were long shots and none of them happened.

Anyway, as I said, justice prevailed against a very overrated movie.

My personal scorecard

Although, as usual, I didn't pay much attention to the pre-Oscars discourse on likely winners (though I did pay some), and, as usual, I made my selections just before the show (actually after it had already ended, but I had seen no results), I did quite well on my picks this year, picking 15 of the 23 categories correctly. And that's even without guessing any of the random ones (the shorts) correctly to help boost my score. So it was 15 out of 20 on any categories I had a reasonable chance of getting correct, which is better than I've done in a long, long time.

My only really big miss: best actress. And this one stings a bit. I felt like I really had a dog in that race this year, and Demi Moore losing to someone like Mikey Madison, who is like 23 years old, just seems a bit of a travesty of the normal rules of Oscar fairness. Moore will never get another shot. I feel a bit how I felt when Bill Murray and Mickey Rourke, who were both nominated as best actor for my #1 movie that year, both lost Oscars to Sean Penn ... speaking of two-time winners. 

Tuesday, March 4, 2025

Anora honored

When I first heard all the buzz about Anora, I thought, "Wow. Well, Sean Baker has been making good films for a long time now." (A few exceptions aside. *ahem* Red Rocket *ahem*)

Then I saw it, and though I liked it (my #26 of last year), it did not really seem like best picture material. Not in filmmaking quality, but in subject matter. 

Oscar voters thought differently, and Anora cleaned up. Even Mikey Madison won. In fact, only Yura Borisov missed. Anora won in every other category where it was nominated. 

Interestingly, I own this film, as I had to buy it in order to fit it into the best available viewing slot between Christmas and New Year's. So, whenever I want, I can watch it again to see what I (sort of) missed. 

Now, on to my thoughts, recorded in real time as I was watching, which is maybe not the best way to do it. (But makes it easier to remember and to publish more quickly.)

This post is not going to receive any Oscars for best editing as I am leaving in all the thoughts I wrote down while watching the show, even though they are boring. Enjoy! 

 - My 11-year-old is starting out on the couch with me, which is nice -- and which makes me feel bad that I couldn't start watching until 20 minutes after I got home from playing tennis.

- I thought my son might be nonplussed by Cynthia Erivo's bald appearance, but he did not mention it. Glad I'm raising a good one. 

- I liked Wicked as much as the next guy -- it was my #2 of the year -- but the opening was a bit long. 

- The orchestra is in the sky! Interesting. I dig it. (Rather literally defying gravity.)

- Conan coming out of Demi. Good one. 

- Missed a joke from Conan because my son is asking me questions. Worth it. 

- The thing at the back of the stage looks like a Marvel superhero's breast plate.

- Yes, my son was still sitting there for Conan's orgasm joke. Just one of the reasons the opening monologue could have been 40% shorter. 

- Okay, I am officially dying now. We're 22 minutes in and there has not been an award announced yet.

- 24:50 - "Without further delay, let's get started." Well, nope. The time-wasting song is the last nail in my coffin. 

- Edward Norton's wrinkles have wrinkles.

- "Going long disorder" is apparently contagious. Robert Downey Jr. and Kieran Culkin have contracted it. 

- Andrew Garfield fawning over Goldie Hawn continues the feeling of excess. I don't know if I can continue mentioning all these things. 

- Is Nick Offerman the Oscars announcer?

- The woman who won the best animated short is adorable. But why is her co-director reading the thing she's already said? There really are no controls on the length of this show.

- I like the idea of giving extensive praise to people like the costume designers, but not the reality of it. 

- (I just dared look it up while potentially risking exposing myself to the spoilers. Yes it's Nick Offerman.)

- (And another lengthy bit with Conan has made this abundantly clear.)

- Until now I did not know what Sean Baker looked like. Thanks, Sean, for giving a professional speech and trying to bring this unwieldy beast back on track.

- The June Squibb Bill Skarsgard bit was funny.

- Well my #1 of 2024 gets at least one Oscar. Indeed, my viewing on Friday confirmed for me how good the makeup was in The Substance. And, I guess, the hair, or sometimes, lack thereof. 

- Halle Berry is not 60 years old. She is not. (It's true. She's only 58.) But is now really the time for a random Bond tribute? And what does Margaret Qualley have to do with it?

- Oh no, the Bond tribute is going into its second song. I really should not have waited 20 minutes after getting home from tennis to start watching. 

- If Baker also wins as director, that'll be some kind of record. Different tone from his first speech but still under budget (quick and funny). 

- Da'Vine Joy is giving Robert Downey a lesson on how this should have been done.

- Glad Emilia Perez (my #4) did not get shut out. Saldana was great in it and I loved her heartfelt acceptance speech.

- Ben Stiller, star of past Oscar bits (remember when he was dressed as a Na'vi?), pulls off a good one here. 

- Mick Jagger is more alive than I thought he'd be. 

- "El Mal" wins. Take that, everyone who thought the music in Emilia Perez was bad. (And nice shoutout to the presenter in their acceptance speech. Probably thought of that on the way up to the stage.)

- My stream of the Oscars, which crapped out during one of the ad breaks, is starting to skip the ads for some reason. Thank goodness for small miracles.

- Now that the show has picked up its pace, I don't mind the musical sand worm as much as I did the first time.

- Nice to get the best of both Palestine and Israel in one acceptance speech. Samuel L. loved it when the Israeli delivered a broadside to the Trump administration.

- Good bit with the firefighters. Worked. Is this show saving itself? Just a little?

- The third sound winner ate nothing but orchestra. Thanks for the number about wasting time, Conan.

- Is Gal Gadot really tall or is Rachel Zeigler really short?

- The late announcement of these technical awards makes it seem like Dune is gathering momentum. It is not. (Scarier realization: It's not actually that late in the show.)

- What is "Ovation Hollywood"?

- Ana de Armas pronounced "robot" like "robutt," which is how Dr. Zoidberg says it on Futurama. (Also, this means I was officially shut out on the "random guess" categories of live action short, documentary short and animated short.)

- Best conceived "in memoriam" in a while. 

- Does Lol Crowley get sick of people asking him if he's laughing out loud?

- Okay, Conan's zing of Trump via Anora finally has me on his side.

- I had started to hear that Timothee Chalamet was going to win best actor, but went against that and picked Adrien Brody. And that happened. And while I never really thought of Brody as someone who would win two Oscars, he deserved it. Great thoughtful speech, too -- a bit long. So winning twice earns you extra time?

- Christopher Nolan CBF to show up and present best director.

- Yep, this post is getting a picture of Sean Baker. I certainly know what he looks like now. 

- Oh no. Demi didn't win. Biggest upset of the evening so far?

- Nice to see Billy Crystal on stage after he lost his house in Pacific Palisades, the one where he had lived since the 1970s. And Meg Ryan looked better than I feared.

- As was obvious by this point, Anora wins.

Well that's it everybody. It's after 1 a.m. even though the show finished around 3 p.m. my time. And now I must sleep.

Monday, February 10, 2025

2024 creature feature regrets weekend

Three weeks is about the amount of clearance I need from the previous year before I start watching movies from that year again, and sure enough, it was exactly three weeks between watching the last 2024 movie I ranked for 2024, A Complete Unknown, and the first 2024 movie I watched during the post-2024 era, which will last from now until the end of time.

And then the next day, I watched my second 2024 film of the post-2024 era.

Both of these were films I had been meaning to see in time to rank them, but missed them for one reason or another. And both feature human beings who might not be quite human.

The first was Marielle Heller's Nightbitch, and there's one of these every year. Well, maybe not every year -- the last one I remember for sure was CODA in 2021. And by "one of these" I mean a movie I wanted to see before my ranking deadline but did not realize was actually easily accessible to me until it was too late.

You may remember I was trying to work our TV at our Air BnB in Los Angeles so that I could get into Hulu and watch this. You may also remember that I was unsuccessful in that endeavor. 

Even more unsuccessfully, I failed to realize that a lot of Hulu content is actually available to us on Disney+ here, due to some agreement I don't properly understand and needn't bother to properly understand. Anyway, I could have watched it before my deadline, but only noticed this a few days later when it was too late.

The first thing I want to tell you about Nightbitch is that it does not star Sandra Bullock. "Why would I think it starred Sandra Bullock, Vance?" I just think the picture in that poster above looks a lot more like Sandra Bullock than it looks like Amy Adams, which is funny because I have never for a moment thought they resembled each other.

Actually, this isn't at all what Adams looks like in the movie. I think that's quite a beautiful picture above, but Adams never looks as beautiful as she actually is in this movie, which was a choice by both Heller and Adams to underscore how much she has been physically reduced by being a stay-at-home mother to a two-year-old. When Adams was younger I thought of her as an actress who would always take roles in which she was clearly very pretty, but the last ten years of her career have changed that impression significantly. She's really in touch with her feral side here, even beyond what is required by the story itself. (Which, if you did not know, is either a real story about some part of her that is turning canine, or just a metaphor for the transformation she wants to undergo to get her old self back.)

I really liked Heller's approach to this script, which consistently breaks out of the ordinary scenes involving Adams' Mother (I only just realized, looking at IMDB, that the character doesn't have a name) in her communications with friends, former classmates and her husband, delivering some sort of soliloquy about her true thoughts -- scenes that really allow Adams to go the extra mile in finding the miserable center of a woman whose life has become only taking care of other people. Heller also intentionally blurs the line between "Is this real?" or "Is this in her head?" as there are some moments where no disinterested observer can confirm what's happening, and some where what's happening does poke its head out into other people's reality. (Though, I suppose, their reactions could still be in her head.)

Obviously in its thematic preoccupations, but also in a certain lacerating quality, the movie reminded me a lot of Jason Reitman's Tully, written by Diablo Cody and starring Charlize Theron. The way Theron eschewed all vanity in that movie to give us a specimen of exhausted motherhood (one who was also currently pregnant in that case) was very reminiscent of how Adams does the same thing here. And in both movies, a well-meaning but lazy husband/father gets called out for the way he passively shirks duties he knows his wife will do if he just shows himself to be even marginally disinclined toward them. Here it's Scoot McNairy, and I have to say, I could see in him a lot of my own failings to do more than 30% of the household tasks in our house -- though Scoot (also nameless, only "Husband" on IMDB) is probably closer to 10%. I'm not as bad as he is ... right? (Or in any case, my kids are now 14 and 11 so it's all long since been forgiven.) I especially liked clever observations in Heller's script such as when she reminds him that she's going into the city that night so he has to be the parent present, and he says "I know, I know, I'm babysitting." And she shoots back "It's not babysitting if it's your own child." Too right.

I might like Tully a smidge better, but I like them both a lot and I think this would have made my top 40 of last year if I'd seen it in time.

I didn't know anything but the title of Zelda Williams' Lisa Frankenstein. In fact, that means I did not know it was written by Diablo Cody, making my referencing of her in relation to Tully quite the coincidence. (Yes, I wrote the Nightbitch half of this post before I watched Lisa Frankenstein, already knowing that was my plan for Saturday night so also knowing in advance the concept for this post.)

If you had asked me to guess what it was about, I would have told you that Lisa was the daughter of either the mad scientist himself, or of Frankenstein's monster, depending on how this particular film wanted to interpret the identity of "Frankenstein." But just from having seen the poster, I could have told you it was not set in the 18th century. 

Making assumptions about this film was the reason it didn't quite make it off my Letterboxd watchlist during the 2024 ranking season, even though I had (paid) access to it for most of the year. It was seeing it pop up on Netflix -- which also may or may not have happened while I was still ranking -- that allowed me to belatedly catch up with it this past weekend. 

It turns out the movie was not what I thought it was about, textually, but was similar to what I thought it was about in spirit, and also a little better than I would have thought it might be. Lisa here is actually Lisa Swallows (the charming and very capable Kathryn Newton), it's just the movie thinks of her as "Lisa Frankenstein" because she ends up inadvertently raising a man from the dead by visiting an old graveyard in her town and dreaming herself away into the statue of him next to where he's buried. Yes, the statue looks a bit dreamy, but Lisa's wish was actually to be dead like him, not to have him alive again with her. See, her mother was killed by an axe murderer the year before, protecting Lisa from said axe murderer at that, and though I called Newton the actress charming, Lisa the character is more mopey and goth adjacent, as you might expect from someone whose mother recently died and whose ineffectual father (Joe Chrest) has since taken up with the town bitch (Carla Gugino) and her kind but vacuous cheerleader daughter (Liza Soberano). Oh yeah, it's also 1989.

Lisa Frankenstein humorously reminded me, in its inciting incident, of a movie I did see and rank in 2024, which was Hot Frosty. In that holiday romance for the Hallmark crowd, Lacey Chabert wishes a handsome snowman (Dustin Milligan) into existence in a similar fashion, and indeed does begin her own romance with that snowman, just as Lisa becomes involved with Cole Sprouse's initially wordless exhumed corpse, who steadily regains his complexion as he regains missing body parts through means not entirely savory. This is surely a better movie than Hot Frosty, though I did like that one too, in spite of my better critical instincts.  

As a leftover from Juno, we still think of Cody as a bit of a try-hard as a screenwriter (she probably rolls her eyes every time someone confronts her with the phrase "home skillet"). However, I have not found that to be Cody's dominant mode of writing in most of her movies since then (including Tully) and I continued to find her work more positive than negative here. I didn't embrace it as much as Nightbitch but it still gets a solid 3.5 stars from me.

And now back onward to non-2024 movies ... again. 

Friday, January 24, 2025

Finally, a proper Oscar nominations post

I never get to write a post exclusively about the Oscar nominations.

As you know, the day they are revealed is, in most years, the day I post my rankings of movies from the previous year. Two more wrap-up posts follow on consecutive days, plus an informal ode to my #1 on day 4. By that time, the nominations are no longer a new enough phenomenon for me to devote a whole post to them and still feel current. 

This year, due to the tragic circumstances of the LA fires, my rankings release and the nominations date became disentangled. (I could have continued watching 2024 movies until yesterday, but I think that might have killed me.) So here I am, able to create a full reaction post and still be within the first 12 hours of the world's knowledge of them.

First let me start by saying I have to officially learn how to pronounce Emilia Perez. Like many lazy Americans, I still put the emPHAsis on the wrong syllABle. (That old joke.) I still say "Perez" as "Puh-REZ," when of course we know it is much closer to "PAIR-ez." I'll get it one of these days.

Emilia Perez did lead all nominees with 13 Oscar nods, a ridiculous number that is higher than I can remember any film getting in quite some time. That number is of course boosted by three nominations in the music categories, for the score and two songs, but hey, 13 nominations is 13 nominations. No reason to undercut it. 

Especially since Emilia Perez was my #4 movie of 2024. Which is gratifying as hell to see. 

I have yet to see Emilia Perez on another critic's top ten list, though granted, I've only closely observed about eight of them. (Lost in this year's busy and travel-filled December and January was my usual perusal of top ten lists from prominent critics. I'm talking about seven top ten lists on two of my movie podcasts and one created by my friend Don.) 

There was a temptation to think of Emilia Perez as one of those movies the Golden Globes embraces but the Oscars do not embrace. (And yes, I do realize I'm following different pluralization rules for those two bodies, which strikes me as strange but which feels right.) And that means if you like that movie, there is something unsophisticated about you.

But no, Emilia Perez has gotten the full-throated support of the Academy, perhaps even more so than the Globes, It's been officially endorsed. It's okay for me to love it as much as I do.

But hold on there, Emilia Perez is not my highest ranked best picture nominee. Not nearly. 

I figured my #2 Wicked would get a nomination, and it did. But only lately did I start thinking, to my general surprise, that my #1 The Substance would get a nomination. I started to get the idea it might be possible not from the Golden Globes nominating it for best musical or comedy, since that category has some allowances the drama category does not, but from Coralie Fargeat being nominated by the Globes as best director. And indeed, The Substance got that BP nomination, as well as another directing nod for Fargeat, a screenplay nod for Fargeat, and the richly deserved and much expected best actress nomination for Demi Moore. (And hair and makeup.)

Suddenly, a top ten list that I felt put me out of step with other cinephiles -- I was often counting no more than one title in common with their lists, though finally one of my podcasters named The Substance his #8 -- is a fully defensible, even mainstream, list. Three best picture nominees in my top five. 

In fact, too mainstream? Am I now a company man or something? Because actually there are three other movies in my top ten that got best picture nominations. Expectedly, The Brutalist (#9) got one, and I think may be the favorite to win. Unexpectedly, Nickel Boys (#10) got one, which I thought would be unlikely since I'd only heard its name called once or twice before that, though one was for RaMell Ross' screenplay, which always gives a movie a chance at the big prize. And even though its predecessor got a nomination, I thought it was no sure thing that Dune: Part Two (#8) would follow suit, because it sounds like some people are cooler on this than the first, and sequels generally are considered damaged goods. 

So, fully 60% of my top ten was nominated for best picture. I'm not sure I've ever had that sort of alignment with the Oscars. There was one recent year, in fact, where my highest ranked movie to get a best picture nomination was my #11, meaning I had zero in my top ten. And this is the first time my #1 has been nominated since Parasite won the big prize in 2019. 

That leaves four other movies, only three of which I've seen. I thought there would be one nominee I hadn't seen, but I was led by early prognosticators to think that might be Sing Sing. Instead it was I'm Still Here, a surprise nominee from Brazil -- a surprise not because I hadn't heard of it, as I did start getting the buzz about it later in the year, but because foreign language films struggle to find a spot here, though perhaps less so in recent years. (In fact, Emilia Perez is primarily a foreign language film, as it has some English despite mostly Spanish. Both films got nominated as best international feature, Perez representing director Jacques Audiard's home country of France.) 

My #14, Conclave, keeps my alignment with the Academy going. That makes seven nominees in my top 15. Astonishing, though with Conclave it was certainly expected. Even my eighth ranked best picture nominee, Anora, almost made my top 25, settling in at #26.

That's where it drops off.

Every time I heard A Complete Unknown's name called throughout the morning, having watched the nominations live at 12:30 a.m. my time as I always do, I shook my head. The movie was my #128 of the year, and I wanted to put it lower except I liked some of the recreation of the period and Timothee Chalamet's performance. Everything else about that film was, I thought, a dud. We'll get into some of my specific reservations as we go through the categories.

Which I think it is time to do now, limiting ourselves to "the big eight" for the purposes of close analysis, followed by some other scattered thoughts. In some cases I will award the highest ranked film on my list but in some cases I will not. I'm mercurial like that.

Best picture

Most deserving nominee: The Substance
Least deserving nominee: A Complete Unknown

Comments: As discussed. 

Best director

Nominees: Sean Baker, Anora; Brady Corbet, The Brutalist; Coralie Fargeat, The Substance; Jacques Audiard, Emilia Perez; James Mangold, A Complete Unknown

Most deserving nominee: Corbet
Least deserving nominee: Mangold

Comments: I'm going to give this one to Corbet despite two other films appearing higher on my list. The Brutalist is the grandest vision in terms of old-fashioned auteurist directing, and I wouldn't mind seeing that rewarded. Of course I would also love to see one of the French take home the statue. And I think Mangold's direction may have actually been one of the worst aspects of ACU

Best actor

Nominees: Adrien Brody, The Brutalist; Timothee Chalamet, A Complete Unknown; Colman Domingo, Sing Sing; Ralph Fiennes, Conclave; Sebastian Stan, The Apprentice

Most deserving nominee: Brody
Least deserving nominee: Chalamet

Comments: Although I said I liked Chalamet's performance, I don't like the movie and so I want its nomination count to go down, not up. Besides, this category contains two movies I haven't seen, and though I also want the nomination count to go down for a movie about Donald Trump -- he'll consider it some kind of ego boost that someone was nominated for an Oscar for playing him -- I can't call a nominee I haven't seen undeserving. Brody edges out Fiennes by having the more demanding role. 

Best actress

Nominees: Cynthia Erivo, Wicked; Karla Sofia Gascon, Emilia Perez; Mikey Madison, Anora; Demi Moore, The Substance; Fernanda Torres, I'm Still Here

Most deserving nominee: Moore
Least deserving nominee: Madison

Comments: It's absolutely wonderful to see a trans performer nominated in the gender with which they associate. It seemed likely the Oscars would get this right, but we couldn't be sure until it happened. And though Gascon is utterly deserving (as is Erivo), I have to give it to my girl Demi, don't I? I haven't seen Torres' film so that leaves only Madison, who was great in and as Anora. What can I say, some categories are just jam-packed. 

Best supporting actor

Nominees: Yura Borisov, Anora; Kieran Culkin, A Real Pain; Edward Norton, A Complete Unknown; Guy Pearce, The Brutalist; Jeremy Strong, The Apprentice

Most deserving nominee: Pearce
Least deserving nominee: Norton

Comments: Another Complete Unknown nomination, another whiff. Norton is fine in this movie, but there isn't a lot of acting involved. This is what I said about the Seeger character in my review: "The portrayal of Seeger in this film is a discussion for another time ... he's largely ineffectual and eventually becomes something of a buffoon, despite seeming like a very nice guy." That is not Oscar material. Pearce edges out Borisov, but Culkin was quite good in a movie I didn't particularly care for. 

Best supporting actress

Nominees: Monica Barbaro, A Complete Unknown; Ariana Grande, Wicked; Felicity Jones, The Brutalist; Isabella Rosselini, Conclave; Zoe Saldana, Emilia Perez

Most deserving nominee: Grande
Least deserving nominee: Barbaro

Comments: Even though I was a bit captivated by Barbaro, who I'd never seen before, come on, Joan Baez is a nothing role in that movie. Though it should be said, much as I love Conclave, Rosselini's role is a "barely anything" role. It's hard to compare the work of Saldana and Grande because it's so different, but I have to give the edge to Grande just because of how much she surprised me and how much her work contributed to why I loved Wicked.

Best original screenplay

Nominees: Anora, The Brutalist, A Real Pain, September 5, The Substance

Most deserving nominee: The Substance
Least deserving nominee: A Real Pain

Comments: I think this is the only nomination for September 5, which I guess is what you get if you decide to release your movie so deep into awards season, with so little ability for people to see it except in screeners at their own houses. Since that leaves me only four choices for least deserving and three of them are in my top 26, the default choice is A Real Pain, which did, I think, have a pretty good script. The Substance wins, natch. 

Best adapted screenplay

Nominees: A Complete Unknown, Conclave, Emilia Perez, Nickel Boys, Sing Sing

Most deserving nominee: Emilia Perez
Least deserving nominee: A Complete Unknown

Comments: I have to say I did not even know Perez was adapted from something else, though maybe it makes sense that Audiard did not just whip up such a crazy idea for a movie out of thin air. The script here is incredibly ambitious and somehow manages to land everything it's doing, including songs. And you won't be surprised to hear yet another jeer for ACU, whose script, I think, is among its worst elements. 

Other assorted thoughts:

1) I have not heard of a single of the documentary feature nominees. How far that category has fallen out of the mainstream. I blame the lines blurring so much with all these quickie, exploitative documentaries on Netflix. 

2) I would have liked to see Kirsten Dunst get a nomination for Civil War, which I thought seemed like a lock. I don't know who you'd kick out, though, since I haven't seen I'm Still Here.

3) There was a movie called Elton John: Never Too Late?

4) I only saw two of the best animated feature nominees. I was on the cusp of seeing the Wallace & Gromit movie while I was in America but was thrown by its 2025 release date on Netflix. I chose not to see Memoir of a Snail (incredibly depressing filmmaker) and Flow (I didn't think I could handle a whole movie without dialogue that late in the viewing season). My preference between Inside Out 2 and The Wild Robot is clearly Inside Out 2, but it was only #60 on my list in what I thought was a bad year for animation. My highest ranked animated movie was one that never had a prayer of a nomination, Ultraman: Rising at #28.

5) Speaking of The Wild Robot, is it weird for an animated movie to get a sound nomination? I'm not sure if I've ever seen that. I feel like the thrust of this award is for sound that accompanies and complements a moving image, and animation is not a moving image in the same way. Or could it be that an animated movie has just never had as good sound as The Wild Robot? I doubt that. 

6) As Bowen Yang noted during the announcements, three of the visual effects nominees created monkeys as one of their primary effects. 

And even though six is a fairly random number of additional comments, I think I can/should release you now. 

Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Horror goes back-to-back -- or does it?

If there is anything stranger than a horror movie taking my #1 spot in 2023, it's a second horror movie taking my #1 spot in 2024 -- when no movie with that genre tag had ever accomplished that feat before.

But is The Substance really a horror movie?

Skinamarink was/is, there's no doubt about that. But is it possible for a movie that's discussed by almost everyone as body horror, to not actually be part of the larger genre assignment in which body horror is presumably a subset? 

I think it's not only possible, but probable. 

Now, we know that at least for the purposes of Golden Globes consideration, The Substance was considered a comedy. I've always thought it was useful that the Globes breaks down its nominees between drama and musical/comedy, since it broadens the number of types of film on which they can shine the light of praise, beyond the five films that might fit into a single category. The Substance almost certainly would not have been recognised if there were only one category.

We can be snooty and cast serious doubt on whether we should grant the Globes any legitimacy whatsoever, but they do provide a useful role in helping us understand how we should think about a movie like The Substance. Although it is not "ha ha" funny in more than a few individual moments -- I think of that great moment where the already gnarled version of Elizabeth Sparkle storms out of her apartment and tells her neighbor to fuck off -- there is no doubt Coralie Fargeat's film is wicked in its intentions, and is a full-on satire even if it not a full-on comedy.

That does leave space for horror, and believe me, IMDB does assign that category to it. In fact, The Substance has a ridiculous number of categories assigned to it, four of which include the word "horror." In order of how they're listed, these are:

Body Horror
Dark Comedy
Monster Horror
Psychological Horror
Drama
Horror 
Sci-Fi

We can't necessarily trust whoever assigns the categories in IMDB, but the number of genre assignments alone -- more than I have seen for any other film -- probably indicates why this movie was such a fabulous success for me. After all, I've gone on the record saying I wanted my #1 movie to push the limits of an easy genre association, and The Substance passes that test with flying colors.

And despite the mention of horror four times in those categories, I still wonder if it is actually a horror movie.

Let's consider what makes a movie a horror movie. I'll start with the most obvious two:

1) It attempts to scare you by establishing a sense of dread, a sense of not knowing what might happen but knowing it will be bad.

2) It attempts to then spring that scary thing on you with a suddenness that makes you jump, which is why we call it a jump scare. 

These primary two building blocks of a horror more are, I would argue, not even present in The Substance.

Although Fargeat's film establishes a sense of eeriness, supported primarily through the facelessness of the company that provides Elizabeth the drug, nothing about what happens to Elizabeth Sparkle is supposed to be establishing a sense of dread. We might be discomfited by the grossness of it, but there are no things we can't see, hiding in the shadows, that might make the scenario more frightening. In fact, we are directly confronted with the things that happen to Elizabeth in so open a way that it is almost a case of over-sharing, while horror fundamentally relies on under-sharing.

Since there is nothing hiding in the shadows, there is nothing to jump out of those shadows. Therefore, no jump scares either.

Of course, to limit horror to those two basic components is to be rather reductive. I also, however, find it fairly useful in terms of deciding whether something is a horror movie or not. If you can think of any true horror movie that does not contain one or the other of these elements, I'd like to know what it is.

"Body horror," though, is absolutely an appropriate genre classification for The Substance, given how much body horror there is in this movie. Interestingly, this leads us to a distinction between the genre called "body horror" and the use of that phrase to describe something you specifically see within any movie. You can say that a movie contains body horror without actually being part of that genre. As a good example, there is body horror of a sort in the Deadpool movies in that the main character is always having awful things happen to his person. Yet you would not for a moment consider putting that as a genre tag on Deadpool & Wolverine

And yet if you were to say that The Substance contained body horror and yet was not part of the body horror genre, well that would be incorrect, now wouldn't it? I think it might have to do with the quantity of body horror. The Substance exceeds that standard by a country mile.

Then the question is, can a movie be in the body horror genre without being in the larger horror genre that surrounds it? 

I don't know if I have an answer to that, but then I can look back on the evidence of The Substance and how little effort it makes to "scare" us in the conventional ways that a standard horror movie scares us. Being a cautionary tale is not the same thing as being scary.

When it comes to the subject of body horror, you should always come back to David Cronenberg. The grandfather of body horror, the genre, includes body horror, the cinematic component, in almost every one of his films. Even A History of Violence has a knack for body horror -- remember seeing the close-up of that guy's face after Viggo Mortensen stomps it? 

Cronenberg's movie Existenz seems like a good example. Although I don't remember a lot of this movie, it is one of the first movies I think of when I think of the concept of body horror in the abstract. My memory of this film, though, is that it uses body horror more for the purposes of science fiction -- like The Matrix did -- than for anything that would truly be categorized as horror. And that provides a good template for what The Substance is, though in this case that primary genre might be satire.

Or it might be science fiction. Or it might be drama. Or it might be dark comedy. These are all possible genre associations for The Substance.

All these questions are to the good of Fargeat's movie. When trying to pick apart why a movie is my #1, our very inability to pigeonhole it is a strong asset in its favor. 

The only thing I know for sure -- and the only thing that really matters -- is that a really awesome movie has gone back-to-back with another really awesome movie.

I can't wait to see what awesome movie succeeds it in 2025. 

Monday, January 20, 2025

2024 in portmanteaus

Twenty twenty-four was a year, just like any other year since 2014. 

Which means it's time for the 11th annual installment of the year in portmanteaus, in which I take two movies from the year just completed, mash them together by title, and see what laughs might arise from the smoldering ruins.

Without any further ado, here's 30 of them:

It's What's Inside Out 2 - Riley's teenage brain gets even more scrambled when all her emotions switch places with each other.

The Deadpool Don't Hurt - Actually, that's a common misconception about the wisecracking superhero. It's quite painful when he gets sliced and diced up by an enemy, it just doesn't have any long-term impact. 

I Saw the TV Crow - Two confused teenagers become vigilantes after they believe they've turned into the characters on a popular TV show. 

Rebel Ridge: The Scargiver - A former marine unfairly detained by the police leads an uprising of local townspeople, giving scars to many corrupt cops.

Red One Rooms - Santa is arrested and put on trial after filling the dark web with reindeer snuff films. 

Ghostbusters: Unfrosted Empire - The origin story of the giant walking Pop Tart that destroyed New York City. 

Bratiator II - Andrew McCarthy, Emilio Estevez and Ally Sheedy team up to fight a digital rhinoceros. 

Better Monkey Man - A simian Robbie Williams cuts a path of mayhem through Delhi while singing and dancing.

Fly Me to the Moana - The latest trick by a mischievous demigod is that he fakes the moon landing. 

The People's Joker: Folie a Deux - Wait, which one has Lady Gaga again? 

Furiosa: A Mad MaXXXine Saga - An 80s porn star hunts down the man sending her cryptic messages, who is always prattling on about guzzoline. 

Sasquatch Suncoast - A family of missing links finds their primitive brains tested when they must decide whether to disconnect Terry Schiavo's feeding tubes. 

Nosferatuesday - Count Orlok meets his match in the form of a giant talking macaw. 

The Substanicky - An Atlantic City lounge act injects himself with a fluid to make him younger so his audiences will still want to listen to his porn-themed song parodies. 

Transformers: One Love - The origin story of Optimus Prime and Megatron as Rastafarians who wanted to transform the world through song, and marijuana. 

The Greatest Night in Cop: Axel F - LA police officers gather for a recording where they all go "Doo do doo do do do do" to the tune of that Harold Faltermeyer song. 

Wolfserines - Two different Hugh Jackmans from two different timelines show up at the same crime scene to dispose of a body. 

Mufasa: The Lion Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes - Talking apes? Talking lions? Who can keep up. 

Janet of the Apes - Watching Janet Planet bores millions to death, resulting in the extinction of humanity. 

Saturday Nightbitch - The first ever sketch on Saturday Night Live was actually about a mother turning into a werewolf. 

Brutalista - A Hungarian architect tries to gain his work visa by doing strange favors for Tilda Swinton. 

Harold and the Purple Christopher Reeve - A storybook character restores Superman's ability to walk by drawing him a new pair of legs.  

Megalopolisters - Adam Driver and Nathalie Emmanuel chase tornadoes that threaten to destroy their new utopian city.

Under MegaloParis - Adam Driver and Nathalie Emmanuel chase sharks that threaten to destroy their new utopian city. 

Longlegalopolis - Adam Driver and Nathalie Emmanuel try to chew more scenery than Nicolas Cage. 

Twicked - Storm chasers follow Dorothy into the tornado, enroll at an academy for students potentially gifted in witchcraft. 

Imagimary - The mother of Jesus tells her husband she was impregnated by an imaginary friend only she can see but we all should worship.

Will & Harperez - Will Ferrell gets an additional surprise when he learns his dear friend was also once the head of a powerful drug cartel. 

Trapprentice - Authorities corner a dangerous criminal inside an arena to hold him accountable for his crimes, but the American people vote for him anyway. 

Hundreds of Beetlejuices - Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Beetlejuice Bee

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Incivility in 2024








I avoided talking about Donald Trump in my year-end post timed to the actual end of the calendar year -- or, talked about him only to say I was not talking about him, which is not quite the same thing. But I can't avoid the inevitable any longer, since there is no doubt the former and future president had a stamp even on the movies we watched in 2024, and not just because he was a character in one of them.

Alex Garland's Civil War would likely not exist if Trump had not spent the better part of the last decade -- really, a full decade now -- raising the temperature of political discourse in the United States, and prompting American citizens who had previously only angrily disagreed with each other to consider actually rising up and killing each other. We don't know who are the "good guys" and who are the "bad guys" in Civil War, nor what ideologies of the warring parties we can squint and associate with either today's Democratic party or today's Republican party. The beauty of the movie is, any viewer can probably see themselves in whoever they see the heroes of the story to be, though that may only be useful to the extent that it helps them reconsider their own tendencies toward this sort of violence. (And if you want the ultimate answer of whose side Garland is "really" on, it's as simple as the fact that the characters we follow are journalists, traditionally the enemy of someone like Trump, as he himself defines it.)

Whether or not actual violence prevailed -- thank you, Democrats, for showing your high road by not fomenting an insurrection like your rivals did four years earlier -- there is no doubt that incivility ruled the day, and has again reduced us to lesser examples of the human species than we once were. At the movies, this may not have resulted in a lot of stories about people strangling each other and calling each other names, though I'm sure there were a few examples of that.

No, more than anything a certain sense of apocalypse hung over the movies of 2024, and this was well before an actual apocalypse was visited on Hollywood and its surrounding neighborhoods in the form of the tragic wildfires of last week -- an event that occurred in 2025 so it cannot meaningfully speak to 2024 anyway. Even my #1 movie, The Substance, embodied this sense of anxiety and imminent destruction, as a woman fought her very self with competing values, ultimately none of them actually heroic, and all serving as a metaphor for the civil war embedded in our psyche right now. Even Hollywood is tearing itself apart in this movie, sometimes literally.

There is always a chance that a second Donald Trump presidency will contain actual good things, endeavors he never dared undertake the first time because he wanted to pander to his conservative base, talking points he no longer needs to execute because he has no more elections to win. Unfortunately, there seems to be a greater chance that the next four years will just engender more creative efforts in the mold of Civil War, which require us to wrestle with our very soul as Americans. 

Here's my annual look back on the year just passed with honors, details and other statistics, a thing I have traditionally posted the day after posting my list, for more than a dozen years now. 

Best and worst performers of the year

Each year in this spot I tell you that the performers listed below -- they aren't always all performers, but this year they are -- are not necessarily the best (or worst) at their craft in the year just completed. They are, however, people who had more than one good (or bad) performance, meaning it was worth writing up something about them beyond just praising them for a single instance of good work. (Or tearing them down for one particular instance of the opposite.) Also, the most determining factor is the quality of the movies they were in, not how they were in those movies. 

Three who had a good year

Demi Moore - Demi Moore stormed back on to the scene in 2024, but not because she was everywhere. It was because she was in one particular place that provided her with the opportunity to do the most daring and thrilling work of her career. What's more, Moore's role as Elizabeth Sparkle in The Substance (#1) involved her confronting the elephant in the room -- the plastic surgery fails of famous women trying to extend their time in the limelight -- and taking that elephant by the trunk, the big floppy ears and the tail, all at once. If Moore hadn't had her own (relatively tasteful) plastic surgery done, she might not be as convincing in the role of a woman so desperate to recover her youth that she tries a mysterious drug that will literally clone a younger version of herself out of her own biological material. As Moore throws strange ingredients in a bubbling pot on her stove and spits expletives, and especially when she rubs makeup off her face like she's rubbing off her own skin, we see a fearless 61-year-old woman (who has since turned 62) for whom the work obviously matters more than the glamour. Her willingness to go nude is only extra credit for the performance, which we are too condescending if we call "brave." Of course, a single good performance would not usually qualify someone to make this special recognition area, and so it is that we were primed for The Substance by seeing Moore in Brats (#62, to match Ms. Moore's age), Andrew McCarthy's documentary that tries to get all his contemporaries as worked up over the term "brat pack" as he is. One contemporary, Demi Moore, is the first to have a truly calming influence over this film, trying to suggest that Andrew take it easy and that it's all good -- but generously, without diminishing his perspective. At least where I sat, this film showed us that Moore, through whatever tabloid experiences she's had and marriages to Bruce Willis and Ashton Kutcher, is doing great, thank you very much. Brats meant we wouldn't even need her to have a Substance and she'd be just fine -- but how much better that we got The Substance, too. 

Austin Butler - I'm not sure if I've ever honored an actor in this section who's had two more different roles than Austin Butler had in 2024. They're so diametrically opposed, in fact, that I'm doing something I've never done in the history of this particular tradition on my blog: I'm including both pictures. How can one man embody both a character who is impossibly alluring and a character who is impossibly repellant, all within the same six-month period? (Answer: It's called acting. Look it up.) But seriously, Butler's work called attention to itself in 2024 -- and not just because I loved both Dune: Part Two (#8) and The Bikeriders (#11). And he wasn't just calling attention to himself by being showy, as that was only his mode in Dune: Part Two, where he plays Feyd-Reutha, the sadistic Harkonnen who is the nephew of Baron Harkonnen and the Baron's equal in repulsiveness, only of a different brand. Due to his far more physically fit frame, Butler is like the most homicidal hairless mole you've ever seen, bathed in the black and white hues of his homeworld and drenched in unsavoury malevolence. Add hair and a bit of a crooked half-smile, though, and you've got the most dreamy guy to wear a leather jacket since James Dean. That's Butler's mode in Jeff Nichols' The Bikeriders, which finds him more in his Elvis breakout form, only a quieter version thereof. And it finds us unable to take our eyes off him, unable to prevent ourselves from falling for him, enabling us to understand how easy it was for Jodie Comer's Kathy to slip into a world where she doesn't actually belong, just because she can't help herself in the presence of this heartthrob. It's a performance that doesn't seem, on the surface, to require a lot from Butler, but we also forget how rare it is these days for someone to convert good looks and laconic charm into the type of performance that would have made him a matinee idol back in the 1950s. Especially since we'd most recently seen him as an abomination who'd get his jollies from strangling cats. 

Cailee Spaeny - Actors don't truly break out in the role in which we first start to recognize them. No, they break out the next year, when they suddenly start appearing in all the biggest movies in Hollywood. That was the 2023-to-2024 trajectory for Cailee Spaeny, who was utterly unknown to me when she starred in Priscilla in 2023, the role that surely got her her 2024 work in Civil War (#7) and Alien: Romulus (#30). Now of course, they had to cast her in those movies before they knew she would receive strong notices for Priscilla, but the Spaeny wave that started in 2023 did indeed come crashing into the shore in 2024. Sharing some of the same traits that have turned predecessors Winona Ryder, Natalie Portman and Millie Bobby Brown into stars (even though she's six years older than Brown), Spaeny is giving us this perfect combination of vulnerability and toughness that characterized both of her 2024 roles. (Never mind that there is something of the shape shifter about her, as she looked more like a young Jennifer Love Hewitt in Priscilla.) Speaking of taking the baton from previous actresses, she made one of Sigourney Weaver's best successors to date in Alien: Romulus, which I liked more than any Alien movie since ... jeez, would it have to be Aliens? It isn't a role that requires a huge amount from her, but she gives everything the role requires and then some. The trickier role, in part because of the hardening undergone by her character over the course of the film, is the young photojournalist in Civil War, hopelessly naive and yet determined to throw herself into the fray like her professional heroes, such as Lee Miller. (Who had her own, far less successful movie in 2024.) Here she's the successor to the character played by Kirsten Dunst, as we get to see first hand how someone who went into the job for the right reasons steadily turns into someone who no longer submits her choices to the same sort of moral assessment. We see this change in Spaeny's performance as the movie goes. If 2024 is any indication, we should want Spaeny as anyone's successor, as she will surely carry that torch with honor. 

Honorable mentions: Michael Shannon (The Bikeriders, A Different Man), Peter Dinklage (Wicked, Unfrosted), Aunjanue Ellis-Taylor (Nickel Boys, The Deliverance), J.K. Simmons (Juror #2, Saturday Night, Red One)

Three who had a bad year

Nicolas Cage - Nicolas Cage has two modes nowadays: The outrageous, playing-to-the-back-row-of-the-theater, gonzo mode that has made him an icon over the course of the last 40 years, and the staid, just-showing-up-for-a-paycheck mode that has resulted in so may straight-to-video movies in the past ten, that only Keith Phipps, the Next Picture Show podcast host who wrote a book about him, could have possibly seen all of them. In 2024, Cage failed in both modes. Although I'm obviously in the minority on Longlegs (#177), my worst film of the year, I doubt even those who liked the movie felt Cage's sing-songy performance as the title character was one of the film's best assets. (Isn't there a scene where he literally sings the birthday song for about five minutes? I've tried to block it out.) Describing him as looking like a bleached Robert Smith does a serious disservice to Robert Smith, but it gets at how ridiculous this guy seems in this movie -- though not as ridiculous as the movie itself. I can't begin to understand how some people found this performance disturbing, given that they knew it was Cage and that his performance is pure hackery. Then there's Arcadian (#156), a truly forgettable post-apocalyptic movie where Cage plays a man who fights -- werewolves? what were they again? -- alongside his sons, in what appears to be England after some disaster has unraveled the rule of law. (While that sounds promising, I promise you, it's so forgettable that I won't even consult Wikipedia to refresh my memory on the basic plot.) Here he's bearded and solemn, and though the two bad performances may showcase as much range as Austin Butler's two good performances, they have a highly unfortunate net output of quality. The good thing about Nicolas Cage during this late stage of his career is there's little chance this previews an imminent decline, especially since I hear good things about next year's offering, The Surfer. (And am friends with someone who produced it.) Cage'll be back, but he does need to be held accountable for 2024 first. 

Pedro Pascal - This will be a sort of piling on of Pedro Pascal without any malice behind it. What can I say, making the shortlist for "Three who had a bad year" entails appearing in a certain quantity of poor-quality efforts, though that doesn't mean your own effort as an actor is responsible for the relative failures of the movies. And in some cases in Pascal's 2024, they truly are relative failures. But let's start with the one I really didn't like, Drive-Away Dolls (#158), and proceed upward from there. The tone of Ethan Coen's movie was just way off -- epitomized by a Margaret Qualley performance I really didn't care for, which might have earned her a spot here if not for The Substance -- and it starts from the film's opening, the only part Pascal is in. It's a poorly written part (what isn't in this movie), and it basically just involves Pascal looking scared while clutching a briefcase before he gets ... well, we won't get into that. But what's ultimately revealed to be in the briefcase just makes the way Pascal acts the scene seem even sillier in retrospect. Then there was my next least favorite, Gladiator II (#143), where Pascal was actually one of my favorite elements of the film. (See, I told you. Unfair piling on without any malice.) Still, I consider this movie pretty empty, and those who chose to participate had to sign off on its lack of usefulness as a sequel to a movie that never asked for or needed one. Finally we have a movie that you'll be surprised to see make this list, The Wild Robot (#119), which most people consider a success. I don't really consider it a success though I did give it a star rating that correlates to marginal approval (three stars). Let's just say that the thing I didn't like about it most was the talking animals, and Pascal voices one of those talking animals. What's more, his fox character, Fink, is highly indebted to a much better fox character in a much better movie, Jason Bateman's Nick Wilde in Zootopia. Pascal's year wasn't awful but it was far from either a utopia or a zootopia. 

Carrie Coon - Like Cage, Coon spent 2024 straddling the line between art and commerce, and neither venture worked out for her. Let's start with the one that should have been in her wheelhouse because it most closely resembles the thing she spent the earlier part of her career doing. Azazel Jacobs' His Three Daughters (#148) is basically a play, and the fact that it didn't originate as a play is frankly sort of astonishing. Coon was a renowned theater actress before she tried out screen acting, and she should absolutely thrive in this environment. And I'm not saying her performance is bad overall -- though there are times that I thought it was bad -- but the movie itself is extremely wordy and poorly directed, leading to sub-par performances from Coon as well as the usually reliable Elizabeth Olsen and Natasha Lyonne. Jacobs' writing makes each of these characters obnoxious in her own particular way, beyond what I think was supposed to be their actual level of obnoxiousness, and all three performers are taken down by the deficiencies of the material. It's just that as the best pure actor of the three, Coon had the farthest to fall. Coon's role in the failure of Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire (#147) is far more insignificant, in part because the cast is so overstuffed that no single player can bear the lion's share for anything the movie does right or wrong. Frozen Empire isn't a terrible movie, it's just such a lackluster one that it would almost be better if it were a flaming turd -- which would at least mean someone had made daring creative decisions that had not succeeded. Particularly for a performer like Coon, we'd rather see her swing wildly and miss than to lay down the feeble sort of sacrifice bunt that Ghostbusters represents for her. Actors with Coon's sort of enviable pedigree don't stay down for long, and it's likely she'll come roaring back in 2025. 

Dishonorable mentions: Emma Roberts (Space Cadet, Madame Web), Celeste O'Connor (Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire, Madame Web), Olwen Fouere (Tarot, The Watchers)

Trans stories take a step forward

There was some hope in among all the ascendant Trumpism of 2024. Movies by and about trans people were not only present in larger numbers, they had a cultural cachet they have not previously enjoyed. It reminded me that even as we see evidence of society taking steps backward, it is ultimately moving forward in ways that can never by dialed back, as the gradual mainstreaming of "others" also gradually has the impact of getting even Trumpers to start accepting them. And the big difference between these and past films about trans people is that there was always an actual trans person either in front of or behind the camera.

The biggest indication of this trend was likely Emilia Perez (#4), a movie not without its controversies in terms of its trans depiction. I've seen it labeled as "incurious" about the trans experience, using it more as a narrative device than as an actual exploration of the thoughts of a non-binary person or person undergoing a gender transition. My take on that is that Jacques Audiard wanted to make an ambitious film with a lot of different things on its mind, one of which is the transition of the title character, but which also includes a social drama worthy of a telenovela, a look at the criminal underworld and even a musical. If the trans themes got short shrift, at least they were there to begin with. And though the movie certainly has its detractors, it cleaned up at the Golden Globes in a way that can't be ignored and that no other film involving trans subject matter has ever done.

Moving down in my top ten just a few slots we have The People's Joker (#6), Vera Drew's controversial use of trademarked Batman characters to dramatize her own trans coming-of-age -- though I reckon this one was more controversial from Warner Brothers' perspective, given that Drew didn't have a legal right to use any of these characters. Her reward was an eventual lack of legal retribution by the copyright owner and widespread critical acclaim of a movie that had a very limited theatrical run, but was ultimately available everywhere for rental. This would be the answer to Emilia Perez in being the opposite of incurious, as it is essentially a confessional told directly to us by the person it most intimately affected. And it's affecting as hell.

Another trans filmmaker who had a prominent placement of her work in 2024 was Jane Schoenbrun, whose I Saw the TV Glow (#41) was a very thinly veiled trans story rather than an overtly textual one. As these characters imagine themselves as characters on a TV show as a metaphor for their trans identities -- more for one character than the other -- Schoenburn uses all her gifts as a filmmaker to place us within the depths of their at times overwhelming despair, putting some truly frightening images up on screen in what is effectively a horror movie. Only the film's flat ending prevented it from being higher on my list -- though I understand that may have been my own experience of it, dramatically from a narrative perspective and as a sis person, while others may have received it differently. 

Finally you have the one true documentary of the group, Will & Harper (#29), which I only finally saw within the past week as my wife finally made the time to watch it with me, releasing it from cinematic purgatory. This is the useful companion to these other three movies that pointedly allows Will Ferrell to ask the questions of his friend Harper Steele that any person trying to warmly embrace the new trans identity of their friend might want to ask. Just because we are caring people with open hearts, it doesn't mean we don't have questions, and in the case of Will Ferrell, most of them are just in the interest of trying to better love his friend of nearly three decades.

If I had to sound one potential sour note about all this, there is the slight possibility that the new prominence of trans people in film played some role in getting Trump elected again. But every dying ideology has to find its last gasp of energy in targeting the thing that threatens it the most, and it's a necessary burning down of the old ways that prepares us for the new. Besides, do we really think your typical Trump voter in Arkansas saw any of these films, or was likely even aware of them?

If it keeps bringing members of our society equally deserving of love -- our friends, our family members, even strangers on the street -- further into the light of our acceptance, it's a short-term trade-off I'm willing to make. 

Musician biopics ape-plenty

If I had to choose a type of movie that was dying out due to creative exhaustion, I might have provided you with the musician biopic as that subgenre. Then in the last month of 2024 movie watching I saw a half-dozen of them.

A couple of them supported my analysis of their dwindling artistic merits. But then, a couple of them did not in ways that I thought were really reinvigorating. 

Rounding out my top 25 was Better Man (#25), Michael Gracey's take on Robbie Williams, bringing his razzle dazzle from The Greatest Showman. This is a straight biopic except, of course, for the fact that the main character is represented as an ape. I liked both movies with motion capture apes I saw this year, but I was more impressed by this one, especially a couple rip-roaring musical numbers that were recorded on a soundstage here in Melbourne (as was much of the film). In using a tantalizing central conceit, Better Man more easily got me to the place a biopic should get me, of making me realize that I love two Williams songs: "Rock DJ" and "Angels," the former of which is the standout musical number, possibly of the year. 

Then on my second-to-last night of the year I watched Piece by Piece (#37), Morgan Neville's documentary of Pharrell Williams that is really hard to classify that way because the entire thing is made of Legos. So yeah, it's interviews with Pharrell and others who worked with him, but it reads more like a biopic because of this glorious bit of artifice. It might have taken me a few minutes to adjust to the choice, but eventually it just made the thing achieve lift-off ... and also made me realize how influential Pharrell has been on the industry. I can't even name the Williams songs I love like I did for the other Williams, because this movie revealed there are too many. 

Then there was a combo of the biopic format and the documentary format, as Kneecap (#34), the movie about the Irish rap band of the same name who rap in the Irish language, actually play themselves in the movie. But then everyone else is actors, most notably, Michael Fassbender. The movie has a joyous punk aesthetic but combines with real social commentary about Ireland and great music. Made me think of Trainspotting, not for the subject matter but for the milieu. 

Alas, that leaves three more titles that were decidedly not in my top 40. The Amy Winehouse biopic Back to Black (#120) and Bob Marley: One Love (#121) were so similar in their mediocrity, and seen in such similar proximity to one another (both on the same leg of one flight to America -- separated only by Kneecap, as a matter of fact), that they couldn't even extract themselves from one another in my rankings. But the big disappointment was A Complete Unknown (#128), the final film I saw of 2024, which was so lacking in narrative momentum that I was dying for some sign, any sign, of how close it was to ending -- and not just because I'd start to get finalizing my list as soon as I got out of the theater. It was also lacking in compelling reasons for its existence, which was the bigger sin. 

Sorry, long foreign movies

I don't usually spend a lot of time in these wrap-up posts talking about movies I didn't see, but this idea struck me and I decided to lean into it as my final mini piece. 

I seemed to accumulate a lot of very long foreign-language movies on my Letterboxd watchlist ... and then didn't get to watching most of them. Inside the Yellow Cocoon Shell, a 179-minute slow cinema movie from Vietnam, was on my radar almost the whole year because one of the Flickchart hosts championed it, ultimately naming it his #1 movie of the year. I learned of his lofty placement of the movie before I finalized my list, but still didn't carve out the time.

A similar fate befell Victor Erice's Close Your Eyes, from Spain, whose 169 minutes would have been marginally easier to fit in. I did go looking for it a couple months ago, but it was not available yet on iTunes, and by the time it was available I'd moved on to other things. Besides, I still sort of want to see his movie Spirit of the Beehive first, but this does not seem to be available for rental anywhere.

There was probably never any chance I'd see Seed of the Sacred Fig from Iran, because it was a late release and not available for rental yet (nor in cinemas here yet in Australia). But it's two hours and 47 minutes might have gotten me anyway.

The one long foreign movie I did watch, however, maybe suggests it was a good thing I didn't try to fit in the others. Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World, from Romania, clocked in at 163 minutes -- incidentally, the shortest of these four -- but only clocked in at #110 on my list. 

Top ten non-2024 films I saw in 2024

I always have to give shout-outs to the best of the best that weren't qualified for the year in question, that I saw in the year in question, and this is me doing that again. Listed alphabetically:

Charlie's Country (2013, Rolf de Heer) - A vital document of the present-day Aboriginal experience by a white Australian director who can pull off that sort of thing, performed by the great David Gulpilil as something of a career capstone. 

Come and See (1985, Elem Klimov) - This harrowing and unflinching one-timer about the horrors wrought upon Russians during World War II holds your face in its hands in the way the title suggests, and is as enthralling a work as it is depressing. 

The End of the Affair (1955, Edward Dmytryk) - I read the novel, then intended to rewatch the 1999 film, but watched this instead, and was very happy I did. 

Giant (1955, George Stevens) - The sort of sprawling American epic they used to make regularly, complete with a performance from James Dean that I never would have expected given what I know about his screen persona. 

Godzilla Minus One (2023, Takashi Yamazaki) - Near my 2023 ranking deadline, I chose to watch The Boy and the Heron in an available time slot where I could watch one of two Japanese-language movies that qualified for that year. I chose poorly. 

Halloween III: Season of the Witch (1982, Tommy Lee Wallace) - I watched 11 Halloween movies I hadn't seen in 2024, but this one -- not part of that project, and actually watched nearly a year ago -- was easily the best, simply by not being indebted to anything else in the series. 

The Human Condition I: No Greater Love (1959, Masaki Kobayashi) - A sprawling Japanese epic as long and as engrossing as Giant, which takes the time to burrow down deep into its characters and setting. 

King Kong (1933, Merian C. Cooper & Ernest B. Schoedsack) - Both Godzilla and King Kong made it onto this list, but I didn't even see the 2024 film in which they appeared together. Mad respect for one of the original monster movies that has effects I can't believe were done in 1933. 

Me and Orson Welles (2008, Richard Linklater) - I didn't expect this to pop up among the big guys for non-2024 movies I saw in 2024, but I really liked this movie. 

The Prince of Tides (1991, Barbra Streisand) - My periodic Audient Bridesmaids series, in which I watch best picture-nominated films I haven't seen, hasn't turned up a real winner until this one, which I had (incorrectly) written off as sentimental pap back when it came out. 

Statistics

Here's where I tell you about what I saw and how I saw it.

Movies by star rating on Letterboxd: 5 stars (2), 4.5 stars (15), 4 stars (27), 3.5 stars (50), 3 stars (28), 2.5 stars (20), 2 stars (19), 1.5 stars (13), 1 star (2), 0.5 stars (1)

As it usually is, 3.5 stars was far and away the leader, though this year it was larger than usual as both ends of the spectrum seemed to be a bit less represented. 

Movies by source: Cinema (44) (5 by advanced screening), Netflix (44), iTunes rental (30), Amazon Prime (17), Airplane (14), Screener (8), MIFF (7), AppleTV+ (6), Disney+ (3), Stan (2), Kanopy (1), Max (1)

Very similar to last year except screeners and airplane movies both took a jump up, and Disney+ fell off.

Total new movies watched in the year: 287
Total rewatches: 35
2024 movies watched more than once: 2 (Unfrosted, The Dead Don't Hurt)

Discoveries

Ariana Grande (Wicked)
Katy O'Brian (Love Lies Bleeding)
Karla Sofia Gascon (Emilia Perez)
Vera Drew (The People's Joker)
Maisy Stella (My Old Ass)

Welcome back

Demi Moore (The Substance)
Mary-Louise Parker (Omni Loop)
Viggo Mortensen (The Dead Don't Hurt)
Ellen Burstyn (Mother, Couch!)
Oliver Platt (Babes)

Dearly departing

Richard Roundtree (Thelma)
M. Emmet Walsh (Brothers)
Louis Gossett Jr. (IF)
John Ashton (Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F)
Quincy Jones (The Greatest Night in Pop)

(We lost plenty of other lovely movie people in 2024, but these were the ones who were also in a movie I saw this year.)

Another name for ...

Inside Out 2 is ... Joy
Joy is ... Babes
The Substance is ... My Old Ass
AfrAId is ... The Wild Robot
MaXXXine is ... Hundreds of Beavers
MaXXXine is ... How to Have Sex
MaXXXine is ... Woman of the Hour
The Crow is ... The Dead Don't Hurt
Harold and the Purple Crayon is ... Imaginary
Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story is ... Don't Move
Sasquatch Sunset is ... It Ends With Us
Mary is ... Immaculate
A Different Man is ... Emilia Perez, The People's Joker or Will & Harper

Lightning round

I usually start out with some comparisons of my list to the Oscar nominations. Alas, not this year. So let's get right into the other stuff:

Most surprised I loved: Wicked
Most surprised I did not love: Longlegs 
Best relative to hype: Conclave
Worst relative to hype: A Complete Unknown
Best movie named after the main character: Emilia Perez
Worst movie named after the main character: Mary
Most surprising use of an actor: Adam Pearson (A Different Man)
Least surprising use of an actor: Chris Pratt (Garfield)
Most common word in 2024 movie titles: Man (Better Man, Spaceman, Monkey Man, Super/Man, Hit Man, Hellboy: The Crooked Man)
Least common word in 2024 movie titles: Sasquatch (Sasquatch Sunset)
Most likely to appear in multiple 2024 movies: The Joker (Joker: Folie a DeuxThe People's Joker)
Least likely to appear in multiple 2024 movies: Lorne Michaels (Saturday Night, The People's Joker, Will & Harper)
You could furnish a living room with: The Coffee Table, I Saw the TV Glow and Mother, Couch! 
Director who lost me: Oz Perkins (Longlegs)
Director who won me back: Clint Eastwood (Juror #2)
Best title of the year: Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Person
Worst title of the year: My Old Ass (but good movie)
Narrative that most needed its shuffling: Strange Darling
Narrative that least needed its shuffling: We Live in Time
Best item hidden in a suitcase: It's What's Inside
Worst item hidden in a suitcase: Drive-Away Dolls
Best movie with a miniscule budget: The Coffee Table
Worst movie with a huge budget: Gladiator II
Longest title: Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World
Shortest title: IF
Best umpteenth movie in a series: Alien: Romulus
Worst umpteenth movie in a series: Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire

Okay, one final 2024 wrap-up post tomorrow with my annual portmanteaus post. 

Saturday, January 18, 2025

The style and substance of 2024

I didn't expect to set a ranking record in 2024.

Usually when you set a personal record on something -- say, a high score on a video game -- you have to have an exceptional go at it. You have to try really hard and narrowly avoid defeat on multiple occasions. The previous record was your record because it was hard to topple, but if you can get just the right set of circumstances to go your way, you can topple it.

Well, I never did anything like that in 2024. I never watched a stupid number of movies in a short time to try to goose my totals and get myself up into the range of setting a record. In fact, I was not conscious of any changes in my routine whatsoever. I guess the previous record was not so stalwart after all.

There are, however, two viable explanations for how I was able to surpass my previous record of 175 movies ranked, set in 2022, without a specific effort to do so:

1) I took four round-trip plane flights in 2024, two within my most recent trip, and two of them greater than eight hours in duration each way. I'm not sure if the first one really counts toward this effort, though, because it was back in April, when I doubt there were many if any movies from 2024 yet available on the plane. (Actually, I just checked, and I did watch Mean Girls on one of these flights.)

2) I rewatched a lot fewer movies in 2024 than I usually do. Those viewing hours have to go somewhere, and it's not like I'm going to allocate them to some non-screen-watching activity, now am I? And I don't do a lot of TV. 

This is not a record I wanted to set. As you may recall in the past, I've fretted about setting new viewing records, because I worry what it says about me and how I'm spending my finite time on this earth.

But as I was noticing the record was in range, I didn't shy away from it. In fact, I sort of leaned into it, in that there were a couple days in the past week where I watched two movies, up from my average of one per day. 

I guess I thought: "Well, I'm going to set the record anyway, why not set it in style?"

And also I thought: "There were a lot of good movies this year, and there are still more, always more, I need to see." 

In the end, I only eclipsed the total by two, ending up at 177. Which means that if I had only watched one movie on the days within the past week where I watched two, I wouldn't have beaten the record.

But who wants to tie a record, or come up short by one? Better to just set the new record and hope that it lasts for a decade. 

Before we get into talking about those movies, I need to get some business out of the way:

Here are the five films I'm most sorry about not appearing on this list. I feel a similar (low) level of disappointment for all of them, so don't read too much into the order. 

5. September 5 - In theory this was released in LA and New York before the end of December, but I didn't see it on any of my searches of local theaters when I was in LA.
4. Queer - This was lost when I skipped going in Maine last month, wanting to earn points with my wife for not insisting on going to the movies while visiting my own family. 
3. The End - I've had Joshua Oppenheimer's movie on my Letterboxd watchlist for like three years in a row, but it came out with such a whimper that I didn't even notice it as being one of my LA viewing options until near the end of that trip. Even there it was only playing at one single-screen theater.
2. Sing Sing - Yesterday I posted that this was going to be my final movie of 2024. It wasn't. I would have worked out my schedule to see this if I had realized earlier it was opening yesterday in Australia. 
1. Nightbitch - Love Marielle Heller, but her movie was only available on Hulu in the U.S. and I couldn't figure out how to make that work at our AirBnB.

Here are five other prominent films that I could have seen but just didn't:

5. Moana 2 - The timing meant I'd have to see it in the theater at a busy time of year in order to rank it, and I wasn't an ecstatic fan of the first so I just didn't make the time.
4. Mufasa: The Lion King - The comments for the other Disney movie at #5 can basically be copied and pasted here. 
3. Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire - Kong: Skull Island made my top ten in 2017. That feels like a long time ago. 
2. Kraven: The Hunter - This had been on my watchlist since I thought it was supposed to come out last year, but it also came out at a difficult time of the year, and there just wasn't time.
1. Heretic - The most surprised not to have seen. Another critic reviewed it on ReelGood, so I didn't prioritize it in the theater, and then it never came down from that premium $19.99 rental price before my deadline. 

And finally, two movies I might have seen but intentionally skipped:

2. The Apprentice - I just didn't want to/couldn't watch a movie that made Donald Trump a sympathetic character. Even a small modicum of sympathy was too much. Not this close to the election.
1. Joker: Folie a Deux - I don't take a lot of stands on movies by not seeing them, but I was annoyed enough by the original Joker, and heard enough bad about this one, that I just decided not to reward the right-wingish Todd Phillips with any of my attention. 

Okay, now to highlight my top ten before revealing my whole list.

10. Nickel Boys - I have more a suspicion of the greatness of RaMell Ross' Nickel Boys than I have a certainty of it. The reason for my uncertainty lies in the circumstances of my viewing: jammed into a trip to Los Angeles, starting at nearly 11 p.m. after trailers, and following margaritas at dinner. Ross' film is the sort of demanding tone poem, which burns with indignation beneath its abstractions, that benefits from more ideal viewing conditions. Neither, however, can I dismiss what I saw before me: a story told from the perspective of two young Black men at the hands of a system of pernicious racial discrimination, at a reform school where they receive vastly different treatment from their white counterparts. Because the perspective is very specifically theirs -- all shots in the movie are POV shots from one of the two of them -- and not an omniscient perspective, it lacks the heavy-handedness that may seem part and parcel to this approach. Instead, this is the ultimate example of showing rather than telling, and the things Ross shows us are not limited to the characters' literal observations of the world around them, as they also include bits of ephemera from the time period, such as shots from space and other details that establish the time and place. I have never seen a movie quite like this, and even though I feel like I only half saw it, I think Nickel Boys is probably the most marvelous sort of challenge even under the best of circumstances. It also contains probably my favorite final shot of the year, one that contains an unlimited quantity of hope, much of it in direct contradiction to what we've just witnessed. I look forward to grappling with it again when my margarita count is zero. 

9. The Brutalist - The Brutalist is my most likely 2024 film to end up on my top ten of the decade, even though it is at "only" #9 this year. It has such fantastic materials -- materials being a primary subject of this architecture-themed film -- that it should endure very well in my memory, and in potential repeat viewings. (Though probably not a lot of repeat viewings, given the 3 hour and 35-minute running time.) In fact, the film I was most inclined to compare it to was There Will Be Blood, my #1 of 2007 and my #8 of the 2000s. In the first half of Brady Corbet's film, I was sure I was making way for a new #1 of 2024, and even started imagining what clever pun I would use in the subject of this post. ("A brutal 2024"? Would have been appropriate for a year where we elected Trump.) But I didn't appreciate the second half at the same level, maybe because of some bits that I thought were narrative non-starters -- or maybe it was the extra ten minutes tacked on to the intermission, as discussed here. Anyway, there's some exquisitely thrilling, epic filmmaking here from a director I would never have guessed capable of it (I was not a fan of Vox Lux), and Adrien Brody's performance in the lead role is outstanding. The Brutalist is the kind of vision you live in, and its long running time enables that. From that striking shot near the beginning of the upside down Statue of Liberty, Corbet announces the boldness of his intentions, and never lets up on that boldness. Given that we did elect Trump this year, that image may also be the year's most symbolic. 

8. Dune: Part Two - Every time I thought about sticking Dune: Part Two behind another film in this vicinity on my list, which would endanger its spot in my top ten, I thought about how the second Dune movie has parts that are undeniably dramatically flat. But then I'd think about the sheer grandeur and scope of Denis Villeneuve's epic filmmaking, and I'd know that it belonged on this hallowed ground, matching the feat of the first Dune and even increasing its spot in the rankings by one. (That's not comparing apples to apples in terms of the rest of the movies in those years, though.) This actually makes Villeneuve only the third four-timer in my top ten after he also achieved the feat with Sicario and Enemy. The sequel is of a piece with the original in everything except the part of the story that's covered, which I find more interesting in the first half of Frank Herbert's novel and in the first movie. But I might be even more impressed by the technique here, as I think of dozens of individual images and moments (the silently flying villains in jetpacks, Paul Atreides finally standing on the back of the worm) and just how spellbound I was. The latter scene even pushed me to the verge of spectacle tears, wrapped up in my favorite use of a Hans Zimmer score in some time. Add in the black and white Harkonnen homeworld and you've got a series that can give me as many sequels as it wants, because I know each new one will creatively stimulate its director, and in turn that director's audience. 

7. Civil War - Alex Garland made what seemed like the most timely and potentially prescient movie of 2024, and then the American people did the rest in allowing it to come true. Thankfully, due to the general sense of decorum of progressive voters, the worst possibilities depicted in Civil War have not yet come to pass, but this movie does create a frightening template of what the future could hold if Donald Trump is just the beginning of a form of inflated political rhetoric that could well last for decades. The director's always intense filmmaking style just gets a jolt of additional anxiety out of the sheer plausibility of what we're seeing here. And though some people considered this a bug not a feature, his unwillingness to clearly take a side in the fight -- there are indications where he stands if you look for them -- just makes it all the more effective a cautionary tale for whoever needs to see it. (Though unfortunately, not an effective enough cautionary tale for the election to go the other way.) Kirsten Dunst is a force to be reckoned with here, but the others who fill out the cast -- particularly fellow journalists played by Cailee Spaeny, Stephen McKinley Henderson and Wagner Moura, but also supporting players like Jesse Plemons and Nick Offerman -- put personal faces on the ideas. A series of tense set pieces culminates in a climax of such apocalyptic sound and fury that I was basically left speechless, and knew this was going to make my top ten even with some minor complaints and nitpicks. (Oh yeah, and I loved the soundtrack.)

6. The People's Joker - I have never seen a movie like The People's Joker because there has never been a movie like The People's Joker. Anyone who has ever flagrantly used the trademarked intellectual property of a giant corporate behemoth has paid the price in terms of risk to their personal fortune long before the art in question ever saw the light of day. Vera Drew's film, on the other hand, not only made it to places people could see it despite Warner Brothers' unsurprising objection to depicting Batman as a predator who grooms young men, and many other Batman characters as gay or trans -- when she shouldn't have been able to use their likenesses at all -- but many critics hailed it as a triumphant cinematic experience, which it surely is. Drew's story of coming out as trans is told through these iconic figures set against DIY Gotham city backdrops that were shot in little distinct locations during the pandemic, and it's both a very funny and a very moving experience. Warner Brothers smartly loosened its grip on the legal apparatus that could have sunk The People's Joker, as someone somewhere had the good sense to acknowledge this obvious parody existed for the most earnest reasons possible, and does more good for their brand than harm. We are all reflections of what we see in our culture, and imagine ourselves limited to those options. But when someone reaches for more than what they were told they could have, and uses classic comic book characters to get her there, it does good for us all -- either in coping with our own similar issues, or better empathizing with others who find themselves in Drew's shoes.

5. The Coffee Table - There is no way to talk about The Coffee Table, and yet you have to talk about The Coffee Table, especially if you are naming it your fifth favorite film of the year. The reason you can't talk about The Coffee Table is that knowing what it's about ruins that important surprise, even though that surprise comes fairly early in the proceedings. There are also reasons why what it's about might prevent people from even watching it in the first place. Allow me just to say that Spanish director Caye Casas' film starts with an argument between a new father and mother over the purchase of a coffee table that he likes but she doesn't, which she has agreed to let him buy because he considers it his only contribution to their decor. The piece has gold nude sculptures as legs, but at least they are done in a sort of art deco style? In any case, this purchase leads to an unimaginable sequence of events where we in the audience are privy to certain information that only one other character knows, and the exquisite tension between what this character knows and what the others don't, but inevitably soon will, is both nearly intolerable and wickedly humorous in the darkest way you can imagine. No less than Stephen King has called this the darkest movie he's ever seen, but we are starting to get close to spoiler territory so I will veer off this track. All you need to know is that I have never seen a movie quite like this and I knew right away I was glad a) that such an original social drama? black comedy? what exactly is this? exists, but also b) that it is the only one of its kind. We don't need another Coffee Table, but this Coffee Table is a feat to behold that will not be forgotten by anyone who sees it. 

4. Emilia Perez - Every time I hear someone write or talk about Jacques Audiard's film, I also hear them drop the word "controversial." I haven't yet dug into what's considered most controversial and from what perspective. If it's controversial from a right-wing perspective, I don't want to hear it. If someone takes offense at the tone-deaf sex change operation number, or anything else that doesn't quite translate the trans experience, I get it. However, I think everything else about this film is marvelous, and it's part of a collection of films in my top ten whose likes I have never seen before. A musical about a Mexican drug lord who wants to live as a woman, in part to protect himself and his family, and in part because he's always seen himself as a woman? Make that she? And from Audiard, a consummately realistic director who makes serious social dramas about criminally adjacent people? Who's ever seen anything like that before? I was wowed by Zoe Saldana and Selena Gomez giving great performances in the language of their heritage -- as I wrote about here -- but this movie really belongs to trans actress Karla Sofia Gascon, who plays both Emilia and her predecessor, Juan "Manitas" Del Monte. I really liked the songs and the energy of the project, to say nothing of the delicious narrative complications that develop after Emilia makes her decision. But it was when I realized it had me emotionally -- during that final scene between Emilia and Gomez's character -- that I knew this was one of my favorites of the year. 

3. Grand Theft Hamlet - And that makes four movies in a row that were completely and totally something I had never seen before. The highlight of my 2024 MIFF was this documentary, of sorts, in which two struggling British actors (Sam Crane and Mark Oosterveen) were playing a lot of Grand Theft Auto during COVID, and then wondered if they could make the game universe effectively a stage where they could ply their trade, even if for practice and personal connection only. In the course of trying to put on Hamlet, they collected other interested gamers from the international community -- acting experience preferred but not essential. Crane and Pinny Grylls' film takes place entirely within the game, as we hear their audio while we see their avatars attempt to stage a full run through, without getting blown away an inordinate number of times by other gamers who have no idea what they're up to. If it sounds funny, it is -- hilariously so at times. If it sounds poignant, it also is, as Oosterveen in particular is struggling with the isolation and the recent loss of his last living relative, leaving him desperate for a project that may be falling apart in front of him. The standards of profundity are met and exceeded on numerous occasions, with the small ticker of deaths of other characters in the game universe appearing at the bottom, a haunting echo of real-world pandemic mortality. Who would have ever guessed video game characters spouting soliloquys could contain so many of the different reasons we go to the movies. 

2. Wicked - Having zero exposure to this musical before seeing the movie -- I had heard "Defying Gravity" before, but no exposure beyond that -- was surely key to why I loved Wicked as much as I did. But more than that, it is just a perfectly executed cinematic gem with popular appeal and real substance, one that defiantly opposed the conventional wisdom to stage a musical within a single film, and came out leaving us waiting in anticipation for the conclusion of the story later this year. Although I have chosen a picture of the stellar Cynthia Erivo to accompany this blurb, and there is every reason to consider this her movie, I was most gobsmacked by the exquisite comedic fitness of Ariana Grande, a pop star I had spent the last decade utterly dismissing. Grande's background in acting was not known to me, and she therefore left me speechless at the fleetness and humor of her performance. The two together in that scene at the dance left me crying for one of the few times at the movies this year, and the only time in the theater, but the more dominant impression of this film is how it sent my spirits soaring with every impeccably staged number, and with that sweet spot between production design and digital effects that stop short of overwhelming the story. Wicked reminded me that I am, indeed, a fan of the movie musical at my core, but it's just so rare to find one carried off as successfully as this one. Jon M. Chu has now made my top ten twice as a director after Crazy Rich Asians, and because I forgot he also directed the less-successful In the Heights, I was equally gobsmacked about his capabilities as I was by those of Grande. One of only two five-star movies for me in 2024. 

1. The Substance - If Tom Cruise had Renee Zellweger at hello, Coralie Fargeat's The Substance had me from its virtuoso opening scene, involving the startling God's eye view of the lifecycle of Elizabeth Sparkle's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame, and then it proceeded to deliver me to the promised land for the remainder of the movie. Among its many miracles is that there are essentially three characters with any lines of spoken dialogue (and two of them are the same person), yet it runs for 2 hours and 20 minutes and never for a moment feels boring. Fargeat impressed with her style in Revenge, but who knew this masterwork of a satire of Hollywood, replete with significant quantities of body horror, was beating within her chest. The Substance is not only the most visually distinctive film of 2024, it also provides an incredible showcase for its three leads, specifically Demi Moore in a role that may one day be considered the finest work of her career. The Substance also finally brought me around to Margaret Qualley, for whom less dialogue is more, and reminded me of the grotesqueries in the arsenal of another actor whose last name begins with Q (Dennis Quaid). I have to acknowledge that some people found this movie anti-feminist rather than feminist, and have other issues with it like whether Fargeat's camera leers too much at Qualley or if it's just hitting the same note over and over. For me, her point was not to make a movie with a message so easy to dissect as "women good, men/Hollywood bad," and The Substance provides evidence to suggest all parties are complicit in the paradigm that requires aging actresses to submit their bodies to all manner of artificial adjustments, as likely to disfigure them as to convince us they're still "young." The truth is, when a movie spins my head this much with its technique and its wicked sense of humor, I don't care what the themes are because I'm just swept along in its visionary tide. I spent a couple months hoping a movie would come along to eclipse The Substance, then about a month feeling there was little chance I'd see something better. I didn't, and I embrace this #1 as I do any other. 

And lest they think they've escaped my elaborations on their significant lack of merit, here is my bottom five:

173. Mary - I'm not sure how I hoped a biblical story of the events surrounding Jesus' birth would be brought to the screen, but I can tell you this wasn't it. Complete with silly action scenes and a performance from Anthony Hopkins as Herod that leaves broken bits of chewed scenery in its wake. 

174. The Wages of Fear - Seeing this title in my bottom five of any list is enough to knock me off my chair, but usually this title would make me think of Henri-Georges Clouzot's 1953 version that I watched again in 2023 and dearly love. Going forward, I hope it almost never makes me of Julien Leclercq's inert 2024 remake, as lacking in tension as it is in soul. 

175. Imaginary - Mainstream horror movies, especially those from Blumhouse, are almost always passable and usually no worse than forgettable. Actually, I do sort of forget why I disliked Imaginary so much, but I think it happened around the time they went into that alternate dimension inside the house -- not something I would have expected or wanted from a movie about imaginary friends coming to life.

176. Space Cadet - I'm sorry, I just don't buy that a prospective candidate for the NASA astronaut program, who wears ridiculous clothing and calls everyone "dude," would a) be able to fake her way into the program and keep it secret despite her obvious mismatch with all the other candidates, or b) ever ever, and I mean EVER, walk in space. (Spoiler alert.) 

177. Longlegs - How do I hate thee, Longlegs? Let me count the ways. A friend of mine wrote a blurb on the Flickchart Blog year-end post in which she described the charm of Oz Perkins' movie as arising from its total preposterousness and failure to make sense in any given moment. I agree with those observations about the film but not with the idea that it leaves the film with any charm. Like, whatsoever. 

And here's the whole list!

1. The Substance
2. Wicked
3. Grand Theft Hamlet
4. Emilia Perez
5. The Coffee Table
6. The People's Joker
7. Civil War
8. Dune: Part Two
9. The Brutalist
10. Nickel Boys
11. The Bikeriders
12. It's What's Inside
13. Strange Darling
14. Conclave
15. Unfrosted
16. Frida
17. A Different Man
18. Love Lies Bleeding
19. Rebel Ridge
20. All We Imagine as Light
21. Daughters
22. Juror #2
23. Omni Loop
24. Problemista
25. Better Man
26. Anora
27. Suncoast
28. Ultraman: Rising
29. Will & Harper
30. Alien: Romulus
31. Here
32. Black Barbie
33. Hit Man
34. Kneecap
35. The Idea of You
36. Babes
37. Piece by Piece
38. Harold and the Purple Crayon
39. Super/Man: The Christopher Reeve Story
40. Goodrich
41. I Saw the TV Glow
42. Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes
43. Io Capitano
44. Joy
45. The Greatest Night in Pop
46. Thelma
47. The Critic
48. Ricky Stanicky
49. My Old Ass
50. The Dead Don't Hurt
51. Monkey Man
52. Road House
53. Mother, Couch!
54. Oddity
55. Free Time
56. Tuesday
57. Humanist Vampire Seeking Consenting Suicidal Person
58. A Quiet Place: Day One
59. Speak No Evil
60. Inside Out 2
61. Immaculate
62. Brats
63. Wolfs
64. The Outrun
65. Saturday Night
66. Woman of the Hour
67. Nosferatu
68. How to Have Sex
69. The Deliverance
70. Red One
71. Orion and the Dark
72. Survive
73. The Underdoggs
74. It Ends With Us
75. We Grown Now
76. Fancy Dance
77. Sasquatch Sunset
78. Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga
79. Force of Nature: The Dry 2
80. Skywalkers: A Love Story
81. Good One
82. Transformers One
83. Matt and Mara
84. Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F
85. Outstanding: A Comedy Revolution
86. House of Spoils
87. Turtles All the Way Down
88. Jackpot!
89. A Real Pain
90. Red Rooms
91. Don't Move
92. Deadpool & Wolverine
93. Scoop
94. Damsel
95. Rebel Moon: Part Two - The Scargiver
96. The Instigators
97. Late Night With the Devil
98. Blink Twice
99. Hundreds of Beavers
100. Challengers
101. The Platform 2
102. Beetlejuice Beetlejuice
103. Sting
104. Sonic the Hedgehog 3
105. I.S.S.
106. Just a Farmer
107. The Piano Lesson
108. We Live in Time
109. Lift
110. Do Not Expect Too Much from the End of the World
111. Slingshot
112. Time Cut
113. MaXXXine
114. Under Paris
115. The Fall Guy
116. Hot Frosty
117. Kinds of Kindness
118. AfrAId
119. The Wild Robot
120. Back to Black
121. Bob Marley: One Love
122. You'll Never Find Me
123. Horizon: An American Saga - Chapter 1
124. Shirley
125. Kill Me If You Dare
126. Trap
127. September Says
128. A Complete Unknown
129. Fly Me to the Moon
130. The Crow
131. The Kitchen
132. Am I OK?
133. Lee
134. A Family Affair
135. Role Play
136. Our Little Secret
137. Night Swim
138. The Exorcism
139. The Beautiful Game
140. Twisters
141. Atlas
142. Birdeater
143. Gladiator II
144. Salem's Lot
145. Borderlands
146. The 4:30 Movie
147. Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire
148. His Three Daughters
149. This is Me ... Now: A Love Story
150. The Balconettes
151. IF
152. Megalopolis
153. Upgraded
154. Tarot
155. Uglies
156. Arcadian
157. Mean Girls
158. Drive-Away Dolls
159. Trigger Warning
160. La Cocina
161. Blitz
162. Summer Camp
163. Argylle
164. Irish Wish
165. Spaceman
166. Madame Web
167. Mothers' Instinct
168. Brothers
169. Carry-On
170. The Watchers
171. Hellboy: The Crooked Man
172. Janet Planet
173. Mary
174. The Wages of Fear
175. Imaginary
176. Space Cadet
177. Longlegs

And finishing with ten more movies whose placement required a little more elaboration, I thought:

15. Unfrosted - There was a moment in this that made me laugh harder than I have at a movie in a couple years, and I thought that was worth top 15.

26. Anora - Is it wrong to say the middle dragged, the characters were not developed enough and the ending left me feeling bummed, but not in a good way?

31. Here - I think I gave extra points just for the gimmick.

41. I Saw the TV Glow - I will always remember being haunted by images from this film ... and wondering why Jane Schoenbrun could not stick the landing.

60. Inside Out 2 - I don't know, I just wasn't feeling it. No pun intended.

78. Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga - I love this world. I don't really love this movie.

95. Rebel Moon: Part 2 - The Scargiver - It was such an improvement from the first one (my bottom-ranked movie of last year) that I had to reward it.

100. Challengers - I guess I was just exhausted at the end. 

119. The Wild Robot - Am I dead inside, or is this movie not as good as everyone says?

128. A Complete Unknown - I never had any idea how close this was to ending.

Thanks for reading. As always, comments are welcome. And be sure to come back the next two days for two more 2024 wrap-up posts ... and then an informal one on the third day.