Showing posts with label lost in translation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lost in translation. Show all posts

Friday, May 22, 2026

The impracticality of Lost in Translation as travel prep

Having determined it was too early in 2026 for JetStar to have any current year releases available for viewing on my flight to Japan, I browsed all the offerings, and jumped at the opportunity to watch my #1 movie of 2003, Sofia Coppola's Lost in Translation.

It seemed like the perfect choice. I have always associated the idea of arriving in Japan with Bob Harris' blurry eyed arrival at the start of this movie. But there are four major differences between me and Bob Harris:

1) He was arriving in Tokyo, while my flight landed in Osaka;

2) He was flying from Los Angeles, resulting in massive jet lag that never abates during his entire trip, while my disembarkment from Sydney meant only an hour and hour time difference and no jet lag;


3) He's a movie star, and I'm only a movie critic;

4) He's not real, but presumably I am.

Watching the movie was supposed to be the fulfilment of a desire to watch Crazy Rich Asians on my trip to Singapore, an activity that was thwarted by geoblocking on my Australian streaming service Stan. I got a lot of my ideas of things I wanted to do in Singapore from this movie. And given that I, in fairly typical fashion, did no advanced prep for our Japan trip -- which will include Tokyo in its second half -- I figured watching Lost in Translation would remind me of some of the things I wanted to do while here, given that it was similarly foundational in my desire to visit Japan. 

But while Crazy Rich Asians really foregrounds its tourist attractions -- the Maxwell Food Centre hawkers' market and the Marina Bay Sands Hotel in particular -- Lost in Translation isn't that sort of movie.

It's a vibe, not a travelogue. 

You can't really watch Lost in Translation and say "Oh, I really want to go to that one sushi restaurant Bob and Charlotte visited" or "Oh, I should really check out that 10th floor karaoke room" or even "That strip club seemed, um, interesting."

What Lost in Translation does for its viewers is it makes them want to have the sorts of experiences Bob and Charlotte had, not see the things they saw. And for most ordinary tourists not estranged from their partners or in some kind of mid- (or early-)life crises, that just ain't gonna happen. 

That said, visiting the "Lost in Translation Hotel" -- I'm not looking up the name right now,  because the point is it exists more for us as a concept than a real place -- is something we plan to do.

So don't be surprised if you ultimately get two Lost in Translation posts while I'm here.

Saturday, August 27, 2022

My ten favorite movies that are moods

I usually like a tight and clever plot -- except when I don't.

The extreme example of not liking a tight and clever plot is any movie with spies. I don't really care who is double-crossing whom and why. I suppose spy thrillers often violate the rules of tightness in order to achieve the heights of "cleverness," but some people really go for that. I don't.

I do generally like it when something happens in the plot late in the movie to give me a little frisson of excitement, not necessarily a "twist," but something I wasn't expecting -- perhaps emotionally. But a lot of time, an emotional "twist" is more likely to be found in a movie where mood is what they're going for more than plot.

This is a roundabout way of telling you that I love a movie that is all about its mood -- but only when it's done well. A movie all about its mood that isn't done well is just an exercise in masturbation. But one that's done well ... *chef's kiss.*

What prompted the writing of this post was resuming my viewing of my previous #1s after a 39-day break to allow for my trip to America. My trip wasn't nearly that long, but I paused this project about a week before I left and it took a week after returning to unpause. I knew I wasn't going to watch any of these while I was gone, but interestingly, I could have. As it turned out, my dad and his wife suggested a viewing of Inside Out as one of our evening activities while we were in Maine with the kids -- and I watched it again even though I'd only just watched it for this project three weeks earlier. If only I'd known, I would have saved it. 

It's not often you watch the same movie twice in a month, especially when it's your fifth or sixth time seeing the movie, but surprisingly, I was hit a tad harder by it this time than on the previous viewing. Maybe it was the company, with some people in the room -- including my sister -- seeing it for the first time. (Or it could have been the fact that my older son was in the room, and he's the same age as Riley, and he also just moved house in the past year, creating many of the emotions Riley experiences. I almost wrote a post about this very thing when I watched it back in early July.)

I contemplated watching a second movie for this project, one I hadn't just watched, on the plane, since Lost in Translation was among the Qantas offerings on our flight. But I was already watching one older movie for Audient Bollywood, so I just couldn't justify yielding a second spot to a movie that hadn't come out in 2022. (Though it would have been a great scenario to watch it, given that jet lag is a big theme of the movie.)

For a time last night, I wish I had, as I was unable to scare up Lost in Translation on any of my streaming services, despite my certainty it would be there. I was going to give up and shift to something else, and may have if I'd been able to find Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind on any of them either. Instead of searching up a third title, I asked myself "How lazy are you?" and just got out my old laptop to hook up to my TV via HDMI, so I could play my Region 1 DVD of Lost in Translation. It really only took about three minutes. I'm glad to know I'm not that lazy. 

I still mightn't have written this post if I hadn't come across another movie I love that's all about its mood while doing some Flickcharting this morning. So here I am.

I decided not to come up with an entirely organic list -- that's a bit too much work for me this morning -- but rather to go down through that aforementioned Flickchart to identify the ten films I've ranked most highly that are about mood at the expense of plot. This is not to say they don't have any plot, just that the plot is there to support the mood -- at least as I experience the film.

Unsurprisingly, the mood for most of these films is "melancholy." That's really what you mean when you say "mood" without any other words to modify it. 

Perhaps also unsurprisingly, these films tend to be supported by a very "moody" score or soundtrack, one that puts you in the contemplative space to appreciate what's going on with these characters. 

Without any further ado, in the order they appear on my Flickchart ...

36. Lost in Translation (2003, Sofia Coppola) - It's a testament to Coppola's excellent musical taste that all the songs on this soundtrack strike an identical tone. As I was listening, and as an owner of the soundtrack, I kept saying "Oh yeah, this song. Wait I thought this song had already played." While that might sound like a backhanded compliment, it's actually a perfect realization of her attempt to establish a tone of melancholy and displacement, one that the movie plays out expertly. There's a disappointment while watching Lost in Translation that the "relationship" between Bob and Charlotte does not have a traditionally satisfying emotional arc, as it hits a bump in the road and ends in a place of minor disjuncture. But that's like actual life, in which connections rarely land solidly. Of course, the actual conclusion to their non-consummated romance hits it out of the park in terms of emotional satisfaction, and wouldn't you know it, there's the Jesus and Mary Chain's "Just Like Honey" to allow us to marinate in that moment.

76. My Neighbor Totoro (1988, Hayao Miyazaki) - I didn't say all my choices had to be melancholy. However, there's melancholy to be had indeed in this film, undercutting the wonder experienced by the children as they discover their new country home and all the various sprites and other magical creatures who lurk in its nooks and crannies, or in the forest just beyond. Let us not forget that weighing down these children's otherwise uncomplicated excitement and playfulness is the knowledge that their mother is sick, and they don't know for sure whether she will recover. My Neighbor Totoro never gets anywhere close to a story and I wouldn't have it any other way.

79. Spring Breakers (2013, Harmony Korine) - Many of my explanations about why I love Spring Breakers, given to incredulous listeners over the years, have never been able to fully encapsulate the special trance this movie places on me. First it captures FOMO perfectly. Then it captures the delirium of the best time of your life perfectly. Then it perfectly captures that feeling of when you've stayed at the party too long and things have started to go south -- also something depicted in Lost in Translation. But again it's the way this movie wraps you in its soundtrack -- particularly the ultimate in melancholy, "Ride Home" by Skrillex -- that leaves me staring off into the middle distance in reverie. 

87. Once (2007, John Carney) - I wasn't at first sure if Once qualified, but it's certainly got the lack of plot. I mean, the characters don't even have names. This probably most closely approximates the missed but made connections between Bob and Charlotte in Translation, as a potential romance is considered but rebuffed, and we sense the profound effect these two have had on each other even though they may never see each other again. It's obvious that Glen Hansard's passionate, melancholy -- there's that word again -- music is the key to fueling this emotional journey, though we can't discount the contribution of Market Irglova, both as a singer and as Hansard's muse in its creation. 

108. The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007, Julian Schnabel) - Two thousand seven was a good year for making us feel more than think, though of course this got ranked with my 2008 films in the first year it was available outside France. Few things are more melancholy -- I'm going to stop calling attention to my use of this word -- than the concept of being trapped inside your brain with only a blinking eye to communicate with the world. Okay, maybe some people would call that terrifying more than melancholy. But there's something about how Schnabel depicts this condition for Jean-Dominique that effortlessly communicates his desire to grasp the beauty of life now that he is intimately acquainted with its fragility. And let's not forget the role music plays here, as there's an unforgettable sequence using U2's "Ultraviolet (Light My Way)" that might not sound memorable on the surface, but wallops you in context.

110. Ordet (1955, Carl Theodor Dreyer) - This might be a stretch and it might look like I'm desperate to prove to you that I like movies made before the year 2000, but there's no doubt that the spell cast on you by Ordet has little to do with its plot. This story of three sons of a devout Danish family, and their struggles with their faith, is the sort of thing that inspired a whole career of contemplation from the likes of Ingmar Bergman, some of whose films could end up appearing on this list. But I think it's really the quiet of their homestead, the rustling of its grass, that places you in this meditative space that carries through the whole picture, and prepares you for the high concept ending that it's best not to spoil.

134. Under the Skin (2013, Jonathan Glazer) - Scarlett Johansson makes her second appearance on this list with a film that basically has no plot at all. Well, it starts to develop something like a plot in its second half, but that's only in contrast to the first half, in which Johansson's alien cruises the streets of Glasgnow for new victims to lure into her black goo. If not for the eerie mood created by this film, it wouldn't have gotten under my skin (so to speak) and become my tenth favorite film of the last decade. But yes, there's melancholy here too -- just look at the expression on Johansson's face at the end and you will understand precisely what has been lost. (A nod to Micah Levy's score to put us in exactly the head space we need to be.)

160. A Ghost Story (2017, David Lowery) - Oh the melancholy! A ghost looks on quietly, helplessly, as the woman mourning him tries to recover from his loss ... and then looks in on the next 300 years or more of the occupants of this building, just for good measure. Daniel Hart's score and Dark Rooms' "I Get Overwhelmed" do tremendous work holding us there once Lowery's images, his square aspect ratio and the performances have brought us to this place. The existential ennui climaxes in a hugely satisfying final emotional payoff.

214. The Life Aquatic With Steve Zissou (2004, Wes Anderson) - I debated whether to include Bill Murray's appropriate second appearance on this list, since I think Anderson is always about mood over plot. But in the end, the thing that connects with me so much about possibly my favorite Anderson film is this blue space it finds and remains in. The decline of Zissou's life is embodied perfectly by the abandoned, overgrown hotel on that island in the middle of the film. And Seu Jorge's covers of David Bowie songs are an essential component to the narrative and character work Anderson is doing.

296. Code 46 (2003, Michael Winterbottom) - And finally at spot #10, we get to the film I came across while Flickcharting this morning that prompted me to write this post. There are some high concepts at the center of a love story between two characters in a sun-bleached Shanghai of the future, when only rich, connected people can live "inside" and everyone else is forging documents to try to escape the harsh conditions. Winterbottom draws a very specific portrait of a future where characters slip in and out of multiple languages while they speak. But it's a Lost in Translation sort of relationship that develops between the characters played by Tim Robbins and Samantha Morton, plot taking a backseat to moments infused with significance and scored by memorable songs like Freakpower's "Song No. 6" and Coldplay's "Warning Sign."

Some I bypassed in this top 300 that didn't quite fit my concept of this post, but could have if I'd squinted a bit:

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, Stanley Kubrick) - 12th
Solaris (1972, Andrei Tarkovsky) - 146th

I also bypassed all my choices that I consider to be straight horror films, because the best horror films are all about creating a mood and that's a sort of different category of cinematic achievement. 

Now that I've become more officially acquainted with this proclivity of mine by having written this post, I'll have to see if I'm more aware of movies presenting themselves to me as moods -- kind of like I immediately notice when a "wax stamp movie" presents itself to me. (Unfamiliar with that concept? See this post.) 

Sunday, May 22, 2022

My 2003 film rankings (in 2003)

This is the fifth in a 2022 monthly posting of the 12 year-end rankings I completed prior to starting this blog, on the occasion of my 25th anniversary of ranking movies. I'm posting them as a form of permanent backup, plus to do a little analysis of how my impression of the movies has changed since then. I'm going in reverse order and will end with 1996 in December. 

It surprised me to see that I've only written about Lost in Translation one time on this blog, and that was when I was talking about travel-related sleep deprivation, not the movie itself. It's still nestled in my top 50 on Flickchart nearly 20 years after I first saw it, and though I've revisited it comparatively few times -- only once since I started keeping track of rewatches in 2006 -- each revisit confirms my feelings toward it. (I'll have another revisit in the near future as part of my 2022 project of rewatching all my #1s.)

Two thousand three was a bit of a tumultuous year, as it involved a breakup with the woman I'd been dating for more than 18 months, though that wasn't until November. It had not yet occurred when I saw Lost in Translation, but I was already in a pretty melancholy state, I suppose, as I expected that relationship to end soon. (It had been my decision to end it, but it was a decision I ended up regretting for most of 2004 as I tried to get back together with this person.) I suppose I call it tumultuous because we had a 24-hour breakup in the summer, but as you know, the first breakup never takes. Other than that, though, pretty stable, as it was the first year since moving to California in 2001 that I had the same job the whole year, and by this point I was really entrenched in my social scene out there.

Now that I've given you my personal 2003 biography, here was how I ranked my films in early 2004 when I closed off my list:

1. Lost in Translation
2. Finding Nemo
3. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
4. House of Sand and Fog
5. Kill Bill Vol. 1
6. Seabiscuit
7. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
8. Elf
9. Big Fish
10. Whale Rider
11. The Guru
12. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl
13. American Splendor
14. The Triplets of Belleville
15. Monster
16. 28 Days Later
17. The Matrix Reloaded
18. School of Rock
19. Camp
20. Capturing the Friedmans
21. 21 Grams
22. View from the Top
23. In America
24. X-Men 2: United
25. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines
26. Shanghai Knights
27. Mystic River
28. The Station Agent
29. Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle
30. Bad Santa
31. A Mighty Wind
32. Better Luck Tomorrow
33. Final Destination 2
34. Thirteen
35. Daredevil
36. Down With Love
37. Anger Management
38. Bruce Almighty
39. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
40. Old School
41. Bend It Like Beckham
42. Love Actually
43. Cold Mountain
44. Identity
45. How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days
46. Hulk
47. The Core
48. Phone Booth
49. Gothika
50. Confidence
51. The Matrix Revolutions
52. Bad Boys II
53. S.W.A.T.
54. Northfork
55. Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd
56. The Real Cancun
57. Paycheck
58. Dreamcatcher

And no, I don't think I was just being cheeky by ranking 21 Grams 21st of the year. I mean, I didn't ranked Thirteen 13th, did I? I like to think my process has more integrity than that ... though maybe it didn't 20 years ago. 

This is how they are currently ranked on my Flickchart out of 5916 films, followed by the percentage of the ranking out of 5916 and the number of slots they rose or fell compared to the other movies from that year on my Flickchart. A positive number indicates a comparative rise of that many slots, a negative number a fall.

1. Lost in Translation (35, 99%) 0
2. Elf (46, 99%) 6
3. Finding Nemo (131, 98%) -1
4. The Guru (228, 96%) 7
5. 28 Days Later (387, 93%) 11
6. House of Sand and Fog (427, 93%) -2
7. The Triplets of Belleville (571, 90%) 7
8. Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World (616, 90%) -5
9. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (620, 90%) -2
10. Kill Bill Vol. 1 (653, 89%) -5
11. Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl (659, 89%) 1
12. Seabiscuit (701, 88%) -6
13. Big Fish (716, 88%) -4
14. Whale Rider (1014, 83%) -4
15. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (1144, 81%) 10
16. X-Men 2: United (1156, 80%) 8
17. Capturing the Friedmans (1236, 79%) 3
18. Bad Santa (1296, 78%) 12
19. American Splendor (1738, 71%) -6
20. The Matrix Reloaded (1797, 70%) -3
21. Camp (1864, 68%) -2
22. Old School (2078, 65%) 18
23. Final Destination 2 (2090, 65%) 10
24. Monster (2115, 64%) -9
25. A Mighty Wind (2327, 61%) 6
26. School of Rock (2343, 60%) -8
27. Bruce Almighty (2815, 52%) 11
28. Shanghai Knights (2839, 52%) -2
29. In America (2866, 52%) -6
30. Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (3024, 49%) -1
31. The Station Agent (3128, 47%) -3
32. View from the Top (3221, 46%) -10
33. 21 Grams (3224, 46%) -12
34. Better Luck Tomorrow (3259, 45%) -2
35. Love Actually (3784, 36%) 7
36. The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen (3910, 34%) 3
37. Anger Management (3955, 33%) 0
38. The Matrix Revolutions (3957, 33%) 13
39. Thirteen (4023, 32%) -5
40. Daredevil (4058, 31%) -5
41. Bend It Like Beckham (4087, 31%) 0
42. Mystic River (4183, 29%) -15
43. Down With Love (4553, 23%) -7
44. Hulk (4634, 22%) 2
45. Bad Boys II (4785, 19%) 7
46. Cold Mountain (5001, 15%) -3
47. The Core (5039, 15%) 0
48. Confidence (5123, 13%) 2
49. Identity (5192, 12%) -5
50. Phone Booth (5308, 10%) -2
51. Dumb and Dumberer: When Harry Met Lloyd (5442, 8%) 4
52. How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days (5464, 8%) -7
53. Gothika (5500, 7%) -4
54. Northfork (5710, 3%) 0
55. S.W.A.T. (5717, 3%) -2
56. Paycheck (5814, 2%) 1
57. The Real Cancun (5816, 2%) -1
58. Dreamcatcher (5853, 1%) 0

Five best movies I've seen since closing the list (alphabetical): City of God, Code 46, Dirty Pretty Things, Memories of Murder, Shattered Glass
Five worst movies I've seen since closing the list (alphabetical): Alex & Emma, The Brown Bunny, Just Married, The Room, Wrong Turn
Biggest risers: Old School (+18), The Matrix Revolutions (+13), Bad Santa (+12)
Biggest fallers: Mystic River (-15), 21 Grams (-12), View from the Top (-10)
Average percentage on Flickchart: 50.67% (4 of 5)

It may just be a feel I get from this list rather than anything borne out by the stats, but I feel like these movies are seriously shuffled around. Their comparatively small quantity masks it a little bit, but there are movies rising and falling all over the place here -- and if there were twice as many movies, they might rise and fall by twice the amount.

The biggest risers are a bit of a mystery for me, as two of them I don't like significantly more than when I first saw them. I've always been a bit underwhelmed by Old School and continued to feel so when I watched it again a few years ago, but there are a few scenes -- specifically the one where Will Ferrell's character outlines his Saturday plans to the college students ("We might go to Bed Bath & Beyond, but I don't know if we're going to have enough TIME") -- have really become personal favorites, apparently elevating the film on the whole. I certainly don't feel like I have the reason to like the third Matrix movie any more than I did back then, especially since I haven't even seen it again, but clearly I've decided to give the whole trilogy certain credit for seeing its vision all the way through -- even if the vision falters near the end. (And really falters in the fourth, which I ranked as my worst movie of last year.) Bad Santa is the only one whose large rise feels really legitimate, as I definitely unlocked something on my second viewing that I didn't on the first.

In terms of fallers, my big turn against Mystic River has a similar origin to my big turn against Crash two years later -- unjust Oscar love. Bill Murray's richly deserved Oscar was stolen from him by Sean Penn, leading to the way I always talk about this movie when people (rarely) bring it up -- I just launch into a quotation of Penn's most histrionic scene, where he continues to shout at greater volumes "IS THAT MY DAUGHTER IN THERE?" (And with the Boston accent, the last word is "THEY-uh.") Incidentally, 2003 must have been a year of awarding overacting, since that was the year Renee Zellweger got her Oscar for chewing the scenery of Cold Mountain -- which couldn't drop much because I pretty much hated it then too.

21 Grams started to curdle for me pretty quickly after I closed off my list, too -- I think Alejandro Gonzalez Inarritu pulled off some structural trick like playing it in reverse order, which I thought was really cool at the time. But even at the time it struck me as the sort of emotionally tormented drama that always turned me off a bit. I genuinely don't know why View from the Top has dropped, since I always thought of that as a bit of a confection, and have consistently given it the win in duels on Flickchart. It must just always come up against movies ranked lower than it so it can never jump up.

The average ranking of 50.67% on Flickchart brings 2003 in at fourth of the five years considered so far.

June will bring us the films of 2002. 

Friday, June 17, 2011

Travel-related sleep deprivation? Check.


If you were wondering why it's been over a week since I posted on The Audient -- which I think may be the longest drought in the history of the blog -- it's because I've been out of town. My friend got married in Annapolis, MD this past Saturday, and to take full advantage of visiting a region of the country my wife had never visited (Washington D.C. in particular), we tacked on two days before and three days afterward.

So that meant that our baby had lots of time to be on the wrong schedule and deprive us (and himself) of sleep.

Actually, he was on the right schedule but in the wrong part of the country. Whereas he'd usually got to sleep around 6:30 in LA, he wasn't tired until 9:30 or 10 in Maryland. Makes sense, but it made for two difficult babysitting nights for my mom (who drove down from Massachusetts) on the night of the wedding and the night before. And yeah, he couldn't really stay asleep for long in the unfamiliar setting of our hotel, meaning we had him in bed with us much earlier in the night than usual, and there were a lot of awakenings. Let's just say everybody spent a lot of the time feeling bleary-eyed.

Which made Lost in Translation the perfect movie to watch on the trip.

I'd seen it before, of course. In fact, I'd guess that this was my fourth viewing. But the first three all came within two years of its release, and it had been almost six years since I'd seen it, though it doesn't feel like that long.

We watched it on our last night, sitting in the chairs on the other side of the sliding door from our room, in the little courtyard that makes up the center portion of the Courtyard by Marriott in Annapolis. My portable DVD player came in handy on the trip, as it was used twice by us and twice by mom, another movie buff.

The movie is of course about that weird half-awake state of jet lag -- not entirely, but its first 30 minutes are devoted to that in one way or another. My favorite sequence in a film that I dearly love may be the very beginning, when Bill Murray's Bob Harris, riding in his taxi from the Tokyo airport, rubs his eyes and looks out at a glittering, marvelously foreign cityscape, really for the first time. The look in his eyes is equal parts awe, confusion and sleepiness. We've all been there. (Plus, Sofia Coppola picked a perfect song to accompany this moment on the soundtrack -- "Girls" by Death in Vegas. So ethereal.)

However, as is often the case when you revisit a movie you love, you discover things about it you hadn't considered previously ... maybe not all of which you love. Here were my new discoveries on this viewing of Lost in Translation:

1) The timeline is kind of goofy. I may have noticed this previously, and was reminded of it all the more this time. Namely, Bob Harris seems to be in Tokyo a lot more days than he needs to be, especially since it's a lot more days than he wants to be. From previous viewings of the film, I had this idea that he met Charlotte (Scarlett Johansson) on something like his second night in town, and started hanging with her soon after that. Really, it's only on his fourth night or so that he finally has a real conversation with her. I actually wanted to go back and re-watch the movie on fast forward to count the number of nights, but it's been busy since I've gotten home and I want to get this post up. But during the movie itself I decided that I would consider their first night hanging out, the karaoke night, to be Wednesday night, relative to what I knew would eventually become a Sunday departure. This turns out to be the case, as they start out at the strip club on Thursday night, and Bob sleeps with the lounge singer on Friday night, leading to their awkward lunch on Saturday before Bob's eventual departure on Sunday. The thing that doesn't seem to make sense is that he was originally supposed to leave on Thursday, but agrees to extend his visit -- in order to spend more time with Charlotte, but ostensibly so he can go on that goofy talk show on Friday. However, by my calculation he actually agrees to extend the visit after he was supposed to have left. Oh well, it's hardly something worth holding Coppola responsible for. I guess we won't quibble too much with the fact that Bob arrived on Saturday for two photo shoots that take place within the first two days, and was still supposed to be there until Thursday.

2) Bob's personal details are kind of goofy. Bob says he's been married for 25 years. That detail alone does not entirely seem to go with him, with a movie star of his stature -- that kind of thing is pretty rare. But then his wife, just from her voice, sounds a lot younger than him, and it's clear that their kids seem to be younger than 10. So he was married to his wife for 15 years before finally having children? It just doesn't quite add up.

3) The literal meaning of the title. All these years I have kind of thought that the words "lost in translation" related to Charlotte's observations of Japanese culture -- the giant digital dinosaur that walks along the side of a building, the people who shoot laser BBs from toy guns, the guy in the arcade who interfaces with the video game via an electric guitar (remember, this was before Guitar Hero came into our lives). Many of these things only make sense in a Japanese context, and Charlotte observes them with a wonder born of not quite understanding. However, this time through I recognized that the title has a very literal meaning, specifically related to the Japanese director trying to communicate with Bob on the Santori whiskey shoot. He spouts 60 seconds worth of words in Japanese, and Bob's translator gives him about ten seconds worth of English translation. Bob is understandably confused by this, assuming that some of the subtlety of what the director is saying is literally lost in the translation. I prefer my original interpretation of the title over this literal one, but it doesn't damage my appreciation of the film in any way.

4) This isn't a made connection - it's a missed one. My wife had the same impression I did from previous viewings, which is that Bob and Charlotte have a really profound soul connection and share a montage worth of cute moments together. Really, that's not true. They basically have one really great night, and flail in their attempt to recreate it. The movie's centerpiece in terms of their relationship is of course the night they go to a party, meet Charlotte's friends, are chased out of the party by guys with BB guns that shoot lasers, end up back at someone's apartment and then ultimately finish by singing karaoke until dawn in a private room at a karaoke club.

This is the equivalent of those great nights we've all had where we went into an evening, with no idea about where it was going to go, and emerged feeling satisfied well beyond our own ability to describe it by all the things we saw and people we met. The truth about every night like this is that when you try to recreate it, it's not even in the same ballpark. Coppola hits us with this reality straight away. The next night, Bob meets Charlotte out at some kind of avant-garde strip club, where all the Japanese hipsters who seemed so enlightened the night before are lost in lap dances. They leave, but have no other real activity planned. We only see them crossing a busy street and later returning to the hotel. During the night they meet again to talk and watch Japanese TV over room service, which is where they start to get into talking about personal lives and life philosophies. In a different way, this becomes a second really great night, different from the first but still very meaningful. They come as close as they get to a sexual interaction here, as Charlotte's feet are lightly touching Bob's side, and he rests his hand on them. That's it.

The next day, Bob agrees to stay in Japan through the weekend, goes on this weird-ass talk show, then ultimately sleeps with the lounge singer. It's so much more common that we don't do the right things at the right times than that we do, and I think this sequence of events and its aftermath really captures that. At Bob's door the next morning, Charlotte hears the lounge singer in Bob's room, leaves in a huff, and shares an awkward lunch with him later on. Them seeing each other in the middle of the night after the fire alarm goes off is that perfect surreal realization that everything has gotten screwed up. It's not enough not to see this person again, with whom you almost connected. No, you have to see them at 1 a.m. after the fire alarm went off, in bathrobes with mussed-up hair, in this confusing tease of a situation that cruelly reminds you of what could have happened.

Of course, Bob and Charlotte get a redemption of sorts by having a less-awkward farewell, then the amazing scene where he spots her from the cab and runs up to kiss her and whisper in her ear. (I understand you can use modern technology to amplify the volume and hear what he says, but I don't want to, nor do I want to google it.) This sort of unlikely denouement (how did she get out into the crowds of Tokyo only moments after seeing him back at the hotel?) gives us the emotional payoff we need, but we shouldn't be confused that they had some great almost-romance. It was a missed connection more than a made connection, which is why it takes so long to get going (I actually felt myself getting stressed out, wanting for them to finally connect) and is over pretty much as quickly as it began.

Lest you be confused, however, this is not a criticism of the film. I actually think the more melancholy it is, the more unsatisfying it is in terms of a traditional Hollywood romantic arc, the more it speaks to me -- the more real it is.

And that's all the realism I have time for today. Still trying to catch up with all the emails people sent me while I was gone, even after a full day back at work.