Showing posts with label joy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label joy. Show all posts

Thursday, January 16, 2025

The busiest 75-year-old in the movie business

I don't mind telling you that the preparation for my three -- actually, four, but one of them is informal and does not involve any compiling of information -- end-of-ranking-year posts begins weeks ago. And that's how it is that I have already completed more than 90% of the writing and other compiling for those posts, just waiting until I'm officially done in two days before putting on the finishing touches.

And what I already have for these posts -- or don't have -- may, just may, guide some of my thinking on the final movies I watch.

The example in this case is my "three who had a bad year" segment of my wrap-up post that follows the day after I put up my rankings. I've already got my three, but I am still looking for one other honorable mention. I thought Bill Nighy could be that guy, just because I noticed I'd seen him in a movie I didn't like very much (The Beautiful Game), and if I also did not like Joy, one of my contenders for my third-to-last movie of the year, then he could work his way into my final honorable mention spot. (Or dishonorable mention, I should say.)

Is this a good way to go about this? Who can say.

So I also went on to IMDB, to ensure there weren't other Nighy performances in 2024 I hadn't considered in my calculations, that might either support or detract from his candidacy.

As it turns out, there were seven. 

Two of those were movies that could potentially be feathers in his cap for the dishonor. I mas middling to negative on both The Wild Robot and Role Play, the latter of which was the second movie I watched for the year all the way back in January. (Yes, I don't love The Wild Robot. We can talk about it another time.)

But then Nighy was also in five other movies I did not see, much of it also as vocal work like he did in The Wild Robot. Those titles were That Christmas, Gracie & Pedro: Pets to the Rescue, The First Omen, Dragonkeeper and 10 Lives.

Is anyone working harder in Hollywood than this man, who turned three quarters of a century old less than a month ago? More to the point, is anyone in such demand?

Obviously you can churn out vocal work at must higher rates than work that requires you in front of a camera. Still, even with those four vocal roles, there were still five of the "in person" type. (And I noticed that he is called Cardinal Lawrence in The First Omen, which is the same name as Ralph Fiennes' character in Conclave. Coincidence? I may have to look into this.)

I have always appreciated Nighy as an actor, though I can see, I have never yet written about him on this blog. And certainly, he does have one of "those voices," which explains why he's cast in so many animated films -- other than his sheer willingness to do it.

Maybe Nighy does still need to put away money for his retirement, if it ever comes, considering that he is comparatively late to becoming a household name. It strikes me that I only first became aware of the actor 22 years ago, when he was in Love Actually and when he was already 53. That's right, my entire awareness of him as an actor comes at ages when he was older than I am now.

Now of course Love Actually was not his first role -- in fact, it was his 70th, of an eventual 168 (and rapidly counting), dating all the way back to 1976. But the fact that I did not know who he was before that, when I'm the sort of guy who keeps track of this sort of thing, means he toiled in some form of obscurity for those first 27 years of his career. (It turns out, I had seen him in at least three movies before Love Actually, which are Alive and Kicking, Lucky Break and Blow Dry, though clearly he didn't make as much of an impression on me there as he did in Richard Curtis' dubiously enduring Christmas movie.)

And there can be little dispute that the use of Bill Nighy is only becoming more common as he ages. These recent years of his career may not be featuring his most prominent roles, though there can be no arguing the perceived desirability of casting him. And even in saying the roles themselves may be getting less juicy, I have to acknowledge that he received an Oscar nomination just two years ago for his work in the pretty good Living. Which, interestingly, was his first such nomination, further proving his status as a late bloomer.

So if you want a Brit who's a bit crusty and a bit superior, but ultimately has that twinkle of warmth that undercuts those traits, Bill Nighy is your guy, and it appears he will be for several more years to come. 

If you're looking for range, well, it may be wisest to look elsewhere. As just one example of how Nighy always plays variations on the same character, he has, to my knowledge, never even played an American, unlike many of his fellow countrymen and women in the acting community.

For the record, Nighy will not be getting a dishonorable mention for his "bad" 2024. I did watch Joy, and liked it quite a bit. And I attribute a significant percentage of my affection to Nighy, though Thomasin McKenzie is fabulous in it.

Of those traits I ascribe to Bill Nighy, dishonor is not one of them. 

Wednesday, January 6, 2016

The year movies were named like hurricanes


Have you noticed how many 2015 movies have just a woman's first name as their title?

Joy became the fifth on my list for this year, and there are two more prominent ones I'm planning to see over the next ten days. And Joy isn't even the only one starring Jennifer Lawrence. (Nor is it the only 2015 movie with a prominent character named Joy, thanks to Inside Out.)

Forthwith, we'll look at the candidates and their worthiness of being named after the main character, starting with ...

Joy
Directed by: David O. Russell
Worthiness of being named after the main character: High
Thoughts: Joy has a lot going on, to put it mildly, but it does mostly focus on this one character and her mop-inventing aspirations. It's also, I suppose, about her search for happiness, so yeah, she joins a storied cinematic tradition of characters with names that also function as intangible nouns. (If I see another movie character named Grace, I may have to kill myself -- and lookee here, there's a movie called Looking for Grace that came out two months ago.)

Serena
Directed by: Susanne Bier
Worthiness of being named after the main character: Moderate
Thoughts: The other film starring Jennifer Lawrence actually bears a 2014 release year in IMDB, but didn't get released theatrically in the U.S. until February, and I'm firmly counting it with my 2015 movies. Like Joy, this also co-stars Bradley Cooper (we just can't separate these two -- they've been in at least four movies together, three of them directed by David O. Russell). It's about a Depression era North Carolina timber baron who marries a headstrong woman named Serena. However, it does not seem very essential that the movie was named after her, even if his fortunes do turn on his relationship with the character.

Cinderella
Directed by: Kenneth Branagh
Worthiness of being named after the main character: High
Thoughts: I mean, it's the name of the story. Who are we to argue with that? However, as discussed in this post, I would have liked the movie better if the character had actually felt like the center of her own story, and not just a bystander letting fate buffet her around like a sailboat on a stormy ocean.

Maggie
Directed by: Henry Hobson
Worthiness of being named after the main character: High
Thoughts: Wake up, Maggie, I think I've got something to say to you. You've been bitten by a zombie, and I don't think you're ever going BACK to school. Indeed, this is the story of Arnold Schwarzenegger's emotional struggle to save his daughter from the inevitable: death at the hands of a zombie bite. Her name is Maggie. Seems like as good a reason as any to choose this as the name of the movie -- it works a bit in the same capacity as We Need to Talk About Kevin, because yeah, when you've got a bitten daughter, you do need to talk about that shit.

Victoria
Directed by: Sebastian Schipper
Worthiness of being named after the main character: High
Thoughts: As the single character who is basically on the screen for the entire length of this daring single-take movie -- "basically," because during one scene where she could afford to get away for a moment, she supposedly excused herself to answer a desperate need to use the bathroom -- Laia Costa's Victoria does earn having a movie named after her. She's the sole constant in this two-plus hours of one late night in Berlin that goes from banal to crazy, in a believable if sometimes tedious fashion.

And the ones I haven't yet seen, and can only truly speculate about ...

Amy
Directed by: Asif Kapadia
Worthiness of being named after the main character: Moderate to high
Thoughts: I understand this to be a stripped-bare look into Amy Winehouse's life, and the title certainly works to convey that type of intimacy. My question is, is the single name Amy distinctive enough to indicate that the movie is about Amy Winehouse without any other knowledge of the film? I'd say no. Not like the future documentaries Beyonce and Rihanna will be, anyway.

Carol
Directed by: Todd Haynes
Worthiness of being named after the main character: Dubious
Thoughts: I say "dubious" only because I know this is a two-hander, meaning it is mostly about the two characters with (as I understand it) somewhat minimal acting contributions from others. If that's the case, naming the movie after only one of them seems to throw off the apparent balance. But I look forward to finding out for myself when this becomes one of the final films I watch before closing off my 2015 list next Thursday.

Other movies I've seen that would have fit well in 2015:

Amelie
Chloe
Coraline
Diana
Domino
Elizabeth
Emma
Evita
Frida
Gigi
Grace
Guinevere
Hanna
Ida 
Juno
Lucy 
Mallory
Margaret
Maryam
Miral
Mulan
Nell
Nena
Oleanna
Paprika
Selena
Tammy
Tess
Woo

That's only 29 other titles among all the 4,400+ movies I've ever seen. Makes the seven titles I will see in 2015 seem even more like a conglomeration.

A trend! I've identified it!