Take two Generation X stars who are identifiable from just
their iconic first names, pair them for the third time and first since A
Scanner Darkly in 2006, and have nobody else in the whole movie speak a
single line of dialogue.
Simple, eh?
You, the audience, become kind of the third character in
this intimate, quirky affair.
At first blush, it seem like Destination Wedding will
be a pointed critique of the type of wedding thrown by people who are just
below society’s upper crust, who can’t afford some decadent affair in a palace,
but who can afford to make their guests take a short plane ride from where most
of them live to attend their destination wedding. Or, more to the point, think
their guests can afford it, and reward them with little gift bags full of
gourmet biscuits and expensive skin lotion.
Destination Wedding is that, sort of, but more than
anything, it captures what it’s like being an outsider at a wedding that you
maybe shouldn’t be attending, where you don’t know the other guests and where
the only people you do know, the bride and/or groom, don’t have the bandwidth
to give you any face time. Keanu Reeves’ Frank should be attending the San Luis
Obispo wedding, in the strictest sense, as he is the groom’s brother. Outside
of occasions like this, though, he avoids his sibling. Winona Ryder’s Lindsay
most definitely should NOT be attending, as she was once the groom’s fiancée,
until he broke off their engagement only five weeks before the wedding. This
was six years ago, but she’s still not over it, and the groom only appears to
have invited her as a gesture toward being the bigger person. She hasn’t even
seen him since then.
Frank and Lindsay meet cute when they are both waiting to
board the eight-seat puddle hopper that is taking them to San Luis Obispo, and
by “cute” of course it means that they initially loathe each other. She thinks
he’s trying to cut her in line. He explains that he’s only moving ahead so as
to avoid the banal interaction she forged out of his polite attempt at
conversation. Clearly, the wedding is not their only destination. Their other
destination is each other.
Maybe. They’ve both got sardonic views on the world and
appear to have contempt for the idea of a long-term relationship, especially
with each other. But these types of things have a way of being smoke screens
that are trying to hide their deeper yearnings.
It’s a two-hander that owes a lot to someone like Woody
Allen, as the characters bicker and eventually bond while unspooling verbose
versions of their life philosophies. The movie is a tad overwritten to be sure.
But Reeves and Ryder are both game participants, and they have a couple scenes
of physical comedy that remind us how well they both can do that kind of thing.
Other recent examples are Reeves’ cameo in (spoiler alert) the movie I saw to
start this weekend and Ryder’s work as Joyce Byers in Stranger Things,
particularly its most recent season.
But one of the things I liked most about it was that the
other characters in the movie are kept at such a distance. We do indeed see the
bride and groom, mostly from at least 100 feet away, once from closer on the dance
floor, but really, never well enough to pick them out from a lineup later on.
Various other characters reappear from a similar distance, and Frank actually
tells us about some of them, particularly the ones who are his own estranged
relatives. Presumably, he does share actual words with them at some point, but
no point we ever see. These two misfits stuck together, both by fate and by
table assignment, never get close to anything that’s actually going on at the
wedding in any scene portrayed on screen.
A lesser film would have certainly given Lindsay an awkward
scene with her ex-fiancee, to show us he’s a douche (as Frank proclaims) and to
help give her the closure she says she’s seeking. Or Frank could have had an
awkward scene with his father, who left his mother for an older woman. According
to Wikipedia, he’s only the groom’s half brother, so I may be misconstruing Frank’s
parentage.
The point is, they are both estranged from this whole scene,
and though they participate in some of the activities – like a pedicure, and an
event where people crash into each other while encased in inflated bubble wrap –
they are really just ghosts.
I think it’s something we’ve all experienced at one point or
another. And you never know who you might find in that scenario.
I don’t want to overstate the quality of the film. It’s more
of a pleasant little diversion than anything. It’s the second feature from a
man who has spent much of his life as a TV writer and producer, most notably on
Mad About You. In fact, it’s so slight, in a way, that the credits start
to roll even before the 80-minute mark, ultimately petering out before the
83-minute mark. (Even though the DVD box lies and says it’s 87 minutes, while
Wikipedia lies and says it’s 85.)
But the star wattage of Keanu and Winona is the type of
thing that gives the project additional visibility. Ryder is no longer in the
phase of her career where she can pick and choose, but her last ten years have been a lot better than her previous ten. Reeves, on the other hand, is possibly
at the hottest he’s ever been, after himself having a bit of an aimless decade
following the end of the Matrix movies. They both likely did this as a favor to
Victor Levin, though it doesn’t show from their commitment to the material.
Anyway, it’s worth a watch, especially if you want to feel
like you’re the third in an 80-minute conversation between two 1990s stars who
burned brightly, and are burning still.
2 comments:
So I passed on this film a number of times for no good reason. However, with you review I will watch it. Thanks!
A totally pleasant way to pass a very short amount of time!
Thanks for the comment Anon.
Post a Comment