When I told my wife I was finally finishing Sisters, the Tina Fey-Amy Poehler vehicle we had started some three years earlier, she said “Didn’t we stop watching that because it was so terrible?”
I said, “No, I think it was just late on a Saturday night
and we were tired. I don’t think it was terrible.”
As it turns out, she was right.
“Terrible” may be a strong word, but the movie does not
showcase Fey and Poehler at their best, though it may showcase Fey at her sexiest,
if you consider cleavage, acting wild and bits of bra poking into view to be “sexy.”
I did, because I have always been attracted to Fey, but my fondness for her
goes way beyond the mere physical. She is kind of the poster child for brainy
women in comedy, so a role like this, in such inferior material, is unbecoming for her.
But hey, even with her feminist bonafides, Fey is probably like any other human
being in that she wants to remind people of her physical desirability as she
hits her mid-40s. (Late 40s now, but this was five years ago.)
The bigger problem with the movie – well, there are many,
but I’ll start with one. Fey and Poehler may be great friends in real life, but
sisters, they do not seem to be. It’s not that they are so physically
dissimilar, but just that they don’t seem like they had the same parents (James
Brolin and Dianne Wiest, in this case). Fey plays a wild party girl and Poehler
plays her goodie goodie sister. Obviously you can have “the good sibling” and “the
bad sibling,” but a shrewd script and/or casting director would find things
that the two had in common that made them read as siblings, even if their looks
or behaviors are different. This reads as two real-life friends trying to have
fun together. But not succeeding.
The premise is that the two grown daughters are facing the
fact that their parents want to sell their childhood home. Both are stunted in
their own way – Fey has a resentful teenage daughter and can’t hold a job, Poehler
is successful but unlucky in love – so they see the selling of their home as a
symbol of the ways they’ve failed. That sounds deeper than it really is, as the
movie bumbles around in the doldrums of physical comedy and dirty language.
What the two really want to do, apparently, is throw a final party in their old
home, inviting all the other 40-somethings they went to school with, even
though the new house has already been sold and the new owners are already hovering
around, being obnoxiously wealthy (they paid in cash).
Can the two women throw a giant rager without destroying the
home? Well, what do you think?
I have nothing but love for Fey and Poehler separately, or
even together in the right context. Movies, though, are not the right context
for them. I never much liked their first cinematic collaboration, Baby Mama,
which again casts them against type in ways that don’t work (with Poehler the
raunchy one in that context, and Fey the good one). I won’t even get into the
icky ways that movie is insensitive, especially racially. Then their most
recent collaboration, in which Fey plays more of a supporting role, was last
year’s Wine Country, which Poehler also directed. That movie is more
flat and disjointed than wrong-headed. It’s quite lethargic. (I remember from
IMDB that they were both also in Mean Girls, but I don’t think their characters
had any interaction.)
Sisters was written by actress/but-mostly-writer
Paula Pell, who appeared in the Wine Country cast and has a small role
here. (These women do like doing favors for each other, and you can throw
Rachel Dratch and Maya Rudolph into this troupe of performers who appear
together, as they also both appear in Wine Country and Sisters.) I kind of feel like Pell
is someone with good comedic instincts. She wrote for SNL for ages and
has punched up the Oscars a couple of times. But you really wouldn’t know it
from here. Even a huge cast of likeable performers – including Ike Berenholtz,
Bobby Moynihan, Chris Parnell, Greta Lee, John Cena and Samantha Bee – cannot scrounge
up laughs from Pell’s material.
It’s not that there are zero laughs, though. I did chuckle
in spite of myself on a couple occasions. Movies where parties spin out of
control usually have at least a couple moments that work, that are sold simply
by the talents of the performers in question. Sisters is no exception.
And so it was that I reported back to my wife that the film
was “not irredeemable.” That’s not high praise though. The 1.5 stars on
Letterboxd more concisely summarize this film’s value.
Okay, I’ll be back in April with another movie I started but
didn’t finish.
2 comments:
I liked Sisters. It was base at times (trophy scene), but had enough laughs that made for an enjoyable HBO viewing.
I think I know what scene you are referring to, even though it is a ballerina music box and not a trophy. But yes, that's the kind of thing that cheapens what should be a bit of a smarter movie.
Thanks for the comment!
Post a Comment